Advertisement

A Resilient Approach to Distributed Recursive Filter Design

  • Qinyuan Liu
  • Zidong Wang
  • Xiao He
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 178)

Abstract

The state estimation or filtering problem has proven to be one of the fundamental issues in signal processing and control engineering, and a number of algorithms have been proposed in the literature, see, e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Accordingly, a core problem with the widespread applications of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is to estimate the plant states based on noisy measurement outputs from distributed nodes. A seemingly natural way is to employ the traditional Kalman filters by establishing a fusion center in WSNs in order to collect all the measurements from the individual sensors and then process the measurements in a global sense. Unfortunately, due to the limited communication capability and energy supply, it might be impossible for the sensors to persistently forward the local messages to the fusion center. As such, the so-called distributed estimation scheme would be more preferable whose main idea is to estimate the plant states based on both the local and the neighboring information according to the topologies of WSNs. Recently, various types of consensus protocols have been proposed with an aim to improve the efficiency of the distributed computation and a rich body of literature has been available on the consensus-based distributed filtering strategies, see, e.g., the seminal work in [11].

References

  1. 1.
    M.V. Basin, J.J. Maldonado, H.R. Karimi, Mean-square filtering for polynomial system states confused with poisson noises over polynomial observations. Model. Identif. Control 32(2), 47–55 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Caballero-Águila, A. Hermoso-Carazo, J. Linares-Pérez, Optimal state estimation for networked systems with random parameter matrices, correlated noises and delayed measurements. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 44(2), 142–154 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.R. Karimi, A linear matrix inequality approach to robust fault detection filter design of linear systems with mixed time-varying delays and nonlinear perturbations. J. Frankl Inst. 347(6), 957–973 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Sun, L. Xie, W. Xiao, Optimal full-order and reduced-order estimators for discrete-time systems with multiple packet dropouts. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 56(8), 4031–4038 (2008). AugMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Wang, G. Yang, Robust mixed \(l_{1}/H_{\infty }\) filtering for affine fuzzy systems with measurement errors. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44(7), 1100–1110 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Yao, L. Wu, W. Zheng, Fault detection filter design for markovian jump singular systems with intermittent measurements. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59(7), 3099–3109 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Yang, Y. Li, Set-membership filtering for systems with sensor saturation. Automatica 45(8), 1896–1902 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.S. Mahmoud, Distributed estimation based on information-based covariance intersection algorithms. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 30, 750–778 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.S. Mahmoud, M.F. Emzir, State estimation with asynchronous multi-rate multi-smart sensors. Inf. Sci. 196, 15–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Q. Li, B. Shen, Y. Liu, F.E. Alsaadi, Event-triggered \(H_\infty \) state estimation for discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with Markovian jumping parameters and time-varying delays. Neurocomputing 174, 912–920 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Olfati-Saber, R.M. Murray, Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(9), 1520–1533 (2004). SepMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Yaz, Y. Yaz, State estimation of uncertain nonlinear stochastic systems with general criteria. Appl. Math. Lett. 14(5), 605–610 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Hu, Z. Wang, H. Gao, Recursive filtering with random parameter matrices, multiple fading measurements and correlated noises. Automatica 49(2013), 3440–3448 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Song, Y. Niu, Resilient finite-time stabilization of fuzzy stochastic systems with randomly occurring uncertainties and randomly occurring gain fluctuations. Neurocomputing 171, 444–451 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Manor, A. Osovizky, E. Dolev, E. Marcus, D. Ginzburg, V. Pushkarsky, Y. Kadmon, Y. Cohen, Compensation of scintillation sensor gain variation during temperature transient conditions using signal processing techniques. In IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, October, pp. 2399–2403 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. Wang, E. Yaz, Stochastically resilient extended Kalman filtering for discrete-time nonlinear systems with sensor failures. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 45(7), 1393–1401 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    F. Hounkpevi, E. Yaz, Robust minimum variance linear state estimators for multiple sensors with different failure rates. Automatica 43(7), 1274–1280 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Song, Y. Niu, S. Wang, Robust finite-time dissipative control subject to randomly occurring uncertainties and stochastic fading measurements. J. Frankl. Inst. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.07.020MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Yang, J. Wang, Robust nonfragile kalman filtering for uncertain linear systems with estimator gain uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 46(2), 343–348 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.S. Mahmoud, Resilient linear Filtering of uncertain systems. Automatica 40(10), 1797–1802 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Yang, W. Che, Non-fragile \(H_{\infty }\) filter design for linear continuous-time systems. Automatica 44(11), 2849–2856 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Yang, X. Guo, Insensitive \(H_{\infty }\) filter design for continuous-time systems with respect to filter coefficient variations. Automatica 46(11), 1860–1869 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Hou, H. Dong, Z. Wang, W. Ren, E. Fuad, Alsaadi non-fragile state estimation for discrete Markovian jumping neural networks. Neurocomputing 179, 238–245 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Horn, C. Johnson, Topics in matrix analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Liu, Z. Wang, X. He, D.H. Zhou, Minimum-variance recursive filtering over sensor networks with stochastic sensor gain degradation: algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 3(3), 265–274 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK
  3. 3.Department of AutomationTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations