Advertisement

A History of Anti-metaphysics

  • Joseph Agassi
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 401)

Abstract

The hostility to metaphysics began as the hostility to scholastic metaphysics and to that of Aristotle. It rested on Bacon’s doctrine of prejudice that led to the recommendation never to advocate an unproven theory: make no hypothesis. The hostility was thus to the speculative method of metaphysics. Russell’s hostility was to Plato’s metaphysics and Wittgenstein’s was more general.

References

  1. Agassi, J. (1964). The nature of scientific problems and their roots in metaphysics. In Bunge, 1962, pp. 189–211; Agassi 1975, Chapter 9, pp. 208–239.Google Scholar
  2. Agassi, J. (1975). Science in flux. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agassi, J. (1988). The gentle art of philosophical polemics: Selected reviews and comments. La Salle: Open court.Google Scholar
  4. Agassi, J. (1993). Conditions for interpersonal communication. Methodology and Science, 26, 8–17.Google Scholar
  5. Agassi, J. (2013). The very idea of modern science: Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle, Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arneson, P. (2007). Perspective on philosophy of communication. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ayer, A. J. (1985). Wittgenstein: The man and his philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Bacon, F. (1620). Novum organum.Google Scholar
  9. Bar-Am, N. (2008). Extensionalism: The revolution in logic. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, M. (1944). The “paradox of analysis.”. Mind, 53, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black, M. (1971). A companion to Wittgenstein’s tractatus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boole, George, 1847, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, Being an Essay Towards a Calculus of DeductiveReasoning.Google Scholar
  13. Boole, G, (1847), The mathematical analysis of logic, being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning Google Scholar
  14. Burge, T. (1973). Reference and proper names. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carnap, R. ([1934] 2014). Logical syntax of language. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  16. Carnap, R. ([1928] 1967). The logical structure of the world and pseudo-problems in philosophy (Der Logische Aufbau der Welt und Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie). London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  17. Coffa, A. (1991). To the Vienna station: The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap (L. Wessels, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Crary, A., & Read, R. (Eds.). (2000). The new Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Darwin, C. (1989). The works of Charles Darwin, volume 21: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Washington: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Diamond, C. (2000). Does Bismarck have a beetle in his box? In Crarey & Read 2000, pp. 262–292.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, C. (2004). Criss-cross philosophy. In Ammereler & Fischer, 2004, pp. 201–220.Google Scholar
  22. Edmonds, D., & Eidinow, J. (2001). Wittgenstein’s poker: The story of a ten-minute argument between two great philosophers. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
  23. Feyerabend, P. K. (1955). Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations. Philosophical Review, 64, 449–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the Id. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, M. (1999). Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gabriel, G. (2009). Carnap’s ‘elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language’. A retrospective consideration of the relationship between continental and analytic philosophy. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 8, 53–70.Google Scholar
  27. Hacker, P. M. S. (2001). Wittgenstein: Connections and controversies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hacohen, M. H. (2002). Karl Popper: The formative years, 1902–1945: Politics and philosophy in interwar Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kenny, A. (2006). Wittgenstein. Revised edition.Google Scholar
  30. Kneale, W. C., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
  31. Koopman, C. (2010). Bernard Williams on Philosophy’s need for history. The Review of Metaphysics, 64, 3–30.Google Scholar
  32. Kripke, S. (2008). Frege’s theory of sense and reference: Some exegetical notes. Theoria, 74, 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landini, G. (2010). Russell. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malcolm, N. ([1967] 2001). L. Wittgenstein: A memoir (2nd ed.). With a Biographical Sketch by G. H. von Wright.Google Scholar
  35. Matusova, E. (2015). The meaning of the letter of Aristeas: In light of biblical interpretation and grammatical tradition, and with reference to its historical context. Göttingen/Bristol: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, cop.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Modrak, D. K. W. (2001). Aristotle’s theory of language and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Monk, R. (1990, 2012). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. London: Vintage Digital.Google Scholar
  38. Mumford, S. (2003). Introduction to Russell on metaphysics: Selections from the writings of Bertrand Russell. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neurath, O. (1973). Empiricism and sociology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neurath, O. (1983). Pseudorationalism of falsification. In Neurath, Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, pp. 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oderberg, D. S. (2011). Essence and properties. Erkenntnis, 75, 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pincock, C. (2005). A reserved reading of Carnap’s Aufbau. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 86, 518–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popkin, R., & Stroll A. (1996). Philosophy made simple.Google Scholar
  44. Popper, K. ([1935] 1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  45. Popper, K. (1945). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, K. (1986). Unended quest: An intellectual autobiography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Quine, W. Van O. (1988). A comment on Agassi’s remarks. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 19, 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quine, W. Van O. (2008). Confessions of a confirmed extensionalist: And other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Read, R., & Lavely, M. A. (Eds.). (2011). Beyond the tractatus wars: The new Wittgenstein Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Reimer, M. (2002). Ordinary proper names. In Preyer & Peter, 2002, pp. 444–466.Google Scholar
  51. Rhees, R. (1984). Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, B. (1956b). Portraits from memory and other essays. London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  53. Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1944). The philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Evanston: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  54. Schroeder, S. (2006). Wittgenstein: The way out of the fly-bottle. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Shaw, B. (1908). The sanity of art: An exposure of the current nonsense about artists being degenerate. London: New Age Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stenius, E. (1960). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. A critical exposition of its main lines of thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stokhof, M. (2011). The quest for purity: Another look at the new Wittgenstein. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 11, 275–294.Google Scholar
  58. Wisdom, J. O., ([1947] 1980). The metamorphosis of philosophy. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  59. Whewell, W. (1857). Spedding's complete edition of the works of Bacon. Edinburgh Review, 106, 287–322.Google Scholar
  60. Wittgenstein, H. (1984). My brother Ludwig. In Rhees, 1984, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  61. Zilsel, E. (2003). The social origins of modern science. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Agassi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations