Advertisement

The Message of Philosophical Investigations

  • Joseph Agassi
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 401)

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s discussions of language games and of forms of life are parts of his theory of meaning. They led him to a fragmented view of language and so he proposed a search for the rules that each of the different fragments follows. The mention of forms of life was only a hint in that direction, and the better commentators overlook mere hints. Whereas young Wittgenstein centered his discussion on “sentences of the natural sciences”, mature Wittgenstein centered on everyday language. He always claimed that metaphysics is meaningless, but as judged by different rules of grammar.

References

  1. Agassi, J. (1978). Logic and logic of. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 4, 1–11.Google Scholar
  2. Agassi, J. (1988). The gentle art of philosophical polemics: Selected reviews and comments. La Salle: Open court.Google Scholar
  3. Agassi, J. (1997). To salvage Neurath (Cartwright et al., Otto Neurath: Philosophy between science and politics). Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 28, 83–101.Google Scholar
  4. Arrington, R. L., & Glock, H.-J. (1991). Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations: Text and context. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Am, N. (2008). Extensionalism: The revolution in logic. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartley, W. W. III (1974). Theory of language and philosophy of science as instruments of educational reform: Wittgenstein and Popper as Austrian schoolteachers. In Cohen and Wartofksy, 1974, pp. 307–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word: Groundings in the philosophy of language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cavell, S. (1962). The availability of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. The Philosophical Review, 71, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dummett, M. (1991c). The logical basis of metaphysics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  10. Einstein, A. (1944). Remarks on Bertrand Russell’s theory of knowledge. In Schilpp, 1944, pp. 278–291.Google Scholar
  11. Feyerabend, P. K. (1955). Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations. Philosophical Review, 64, 449–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogelin, R. J. (2009). Taking Wittgenstein at his word: A textual study. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gellner, E. ([1959] 2005). Words and things: An examination of, and an attack on, linguistic philosophy. London/New York: Routledge Classics . Foreword by Bertrand Russell, with a New Introduction by Ian Jarvie.Google Scholar
  14. Gellner, E. (1984). The gospel according to Ludwig. Review of Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language by Saul A. Kripke: The American Scholar, 53, 243–4, 250–1, 254–6, 258–60, 262–3.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, J. A., & Jarvie, I. C. (Eds.). (1996). The social philosophy of ernest Gellner. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  16. Hare, R. M. (1964). A question about Plato’s theory of ideas. In Bunge 1964, pp. 61–81.Google Scholar
  17. Hilmy, S. (1985). The later Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Kienpointner, M. (1996). Whorf and Wittgenstein. Language, world view and argumentation. Argumentation, 10, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreisel, G. (1978). Review of Wittgenstein’s lectures on the foundations of mathematics, Cambridge, 1939. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 84, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kripke, S. (1972). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language: An elementary exposition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Lambert, K. (1963). Existential import revisited. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, IV, 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Linsky, L. (1967). Referring. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lurie, Y. (2012). Wittgenstein on the human spirit. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  25. McGuinness, B. (2012). Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and documents 1911–1951 (4th ed.). Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Monk, R. (1990, 2012). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. London: Vintage Digital.Google Scholar
  27. Pascal, F. (1973). Wittgenstein: A personal memoir. Encounter, August 1973, 23–38. Reprinted in Rhees et al., 1984.Google Scholar
  28. Ramsey, F. P. (1923). Critical notice of the Tractatus. Mind, 32, 465–478 Reprinted in Ramsey 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhees, R. (1998). Wittgenstein and the possibility of discourse (D. Z. Phillips, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, B. (1912). Problems of philosophy. New York: H. Holt.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, B. (1929). How I came by my creed. The Realist, 1, 14–29. Also as What I Believe, The Forum, 82, 129–134.Google Scholar
  32. Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning & truth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  33. Russell, B. (1944). My mental development; replies to criticisms. In Schilpp, 1944, pp. 1–20 and 679–741.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, B. (1953). The cult of common usage. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 303–307 Reprinted in Russell 1956b, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stern, D. (2001). Was Wittgenstein a Jew? In Klagge 2001, pp. 237–272.Google Scholar
  37. Stern, D. (2004). Wittgenstein’s philosophical investigations: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tranøy, K. E. (1988). The moral import of science. Essays on normative theory, scientific activity and Wittgenstein. Søreidgrend: Sigma Forlag.Google Scholar
  40. van Heijenoort, J. (1967). Logic as calculus and logic as language. Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1964/1966, 440–446.Google Scholar
  41. van Peursen, C. A. (1970). Ludwig Wittgenstein: An introduction to his philosophy. E.P. Dutton & Co: New York.Google Scholar
  42. Vinten, R. (2015). Was Wittgenstein a conservative philosopher? Revista Estudos Hum(e)anos. http://revista.estudoshumeanos.com/was-wittgenstein-a-conservative-philosopher-por-robert-vinten/
  43. von Hayek, F. A. (1977). Remembering My Cousin Ludwig Wittgenstein. Encounter, August 19, 1977, 20–21. Reprinted in his 1992, 176–181.Google Scholar
  44. Williamson, T. (2014). How did we get here from there? The transformation of analytic philosophy. Belgrade Philosophical Annual, 27, 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wisdom, J. T. D. ([1934] 1963). Problems of mind and matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wittgenstein, L. (1938). Lectures on religious belief. http://www.depa.univ-paris8.fr/IMG/pdf/Lectures_on_Religious_Belief.pdf
  47. Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Lectures on the foundations of mathematics, Cambridge, 1939. Edited by Cora diamond from the notes of R. G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees, & Yorick Smythies.Google Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Culture and value (P. Winch, Trans., G. H. von Wright Ed., in collaboration with Heikki Nyman.Google Scholar
  49. Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Wittgenstein’s lectures, Cambridge: 1930–1932. From the Notes of John King & Desmond Lee.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Agassi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations