Advertisement

Assessment of a Heat Pump-Based Wastewater Heat Recovery System for a Canadian University Campus

  • Colton Chow
  • Jean Duquette
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

Domestic hot water use in Canada accounts for roughly 19% and 8% of total residential and commercial building energy use, respectively. After use by building occupants, domestic hot water is disposed of in the sewer system where it mixes with other wastewater streams, typically reaching temperatures as high as 25 °C. Thus, an opportunity exists for recovering low-grade heat from wastewater and using it for meeting local thermal loads. This study uses the Carleton University campus, located in Ottawa, Canada, as a case study for wastewater heat recovery. The campus wastewater energy resource is estimated using a novel method, and a feasibility analysis is conducted on an industrial-scale heat pump that recovers waste heat from the university’s main sewer outflow pipe. The recovered heat is used for heating water at the university’s main athletics facility. Results show that installing a wastewater heat recovery system decreases greenhouse gas emissions and total annual costs by approximately 95% and 8%, respectively, relative to a base case natural gas heating system. Low-grade wastewater heat is an underutilized energy source that is both sustainable and accessible in most urban centres across Canada. Increasing the capacity of wastewater heat recovery systems has the potential to significantly increase energy savings and decrease greenhouse gas emissions in our energy system.

Nomenclature

Abbreviations

GHG

Greenhouse gases

COP

Coefficient of performance

BC

Base case scenario

SHR

Sewer heat recovery scenario

BCRE

Best-case recoverable energy estimation

WCRE

Worst-case recoverable energy estimation

Variables

\( \dot{V}\left( t \right) \)

Building water consumption (m3/hr)

\( \dot{V}_{sewer} \left( t \right) \)

Hourly variation of flow in the main sewer outflow pipe (m3/hr)

\( V_{heated} \)

Volume of water heated by a building in a set time period (m3)

\( Q \)

Energy used to heat hot water in buildings (kJ)

\( \rho \)

Density of water (kg/m3)

\( C_{p} \)

Heat capacity of water (kJ/kgK)

\( T_{SP} \)

Temperature of the hot water tanks on campus (°C)

\( T_{mains} \)

Temperature of fresh water in the water mains (°C)

\( \phi \)

Heating ratio

\( V_{total} \)

Total volume of water used in a building during a set time period (m3)

\( T_{out} \)

Temperature of the outflow from a single building (°C)

\( \dot{Q}_{Sewer} \left( t \right) \)

Energy in the main sewer outflow pipe (kW)

\( T_{sewer} \left( t \right) \)

Hourly variation of temperature in the main sewer outflow pipe (°C)

\( \dot{Q}_{{re\text{cov} erable}} \left( t \right) \)

Hourly variation of energy that is recoverable from the main sewer outflow pipe (kW)

\( T_{{disch}\mathrm{arg}e} \)

Temperature at which the effluent leaves the Carleton campus and enters the city sewers (°C)

\( \dot{Q}_{out,BC} \left( t \right) \)

Energy output to meet the domestic hot water load in the base case scenario (kW)

\( \dot{Q}_{fuel} \left( t \right) \)

Energy content of the fuel entering the boiler in the base case scenario (kW)

\( \eta_{BC} \)

Average efficiency of the boiler in the base case scenario (%)

\( \dot{W}_{in,ep} \left( t \right) \)

Energy required to pump effluent from the wet well to the heat pump evaporator (kW)

\( \dot{Q}_{evap} \left( t \right) \)

Energy absorbed by the heat pump evaporator (kW)

\( T_{LLT} \left( t \right) \)

Temperature at which the effluent leaves the heat pump evaporator (°C)

g

Rate of acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)

\( \Delta H \)

Effluent pump system head loss (m)

\( \eta_{ep} \)

Effluent pump efficiency (%)

f

Friction factor

L

Effluent pump system pipe length (m)

d

Effluent pump system pipe diameter (m)

v

Fluid velocity in the pipe (m/s)

K

Minor loss coefficient

\( \dot{V}_{\hbox{max} ,ep} \)

Maximum volumetric flow rate through the effluent pump system (m3/s)

\( v_{econ} \)

Economic velocity of water (m/s)

\( \dot{Q}_{out,SHR} \left( t \right) \)

Energy output to meet the domestic hot water load in the sewer heat recovery scenario (kW)

\( \dot{W}_{in,HP} \left( t \right) \)

Energy required to drive the heat pump compressor (kW)

COP(t)

Heat pump coefficient of performance (COP)

AC

Total annual cost ($/yr)

NPC

Net present cost ($)

i

Discount rate (%)

\( C_{c} \)

Capital cost ($)

\( M_{c} \)

Maintenance cost ($/yr)

\( F_{c} \)

Variable fuel cost ($/yr)

j

Number of periods in net present cost calculation

\( m_{{CO_{{2^{e} }} }} \)

GHG emissions in equivalent metric tonnes of CO2 (tonnes)

AEO

Annual energy output (MWh)

\( e_{{CO_{{2^{e} }} }} \)

Greenhouse gas emission factor (kg/MWh)

k

Fuel escalation rate (%)

n

System lifetime (yr)

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Carleton Discovery Center for partly funding this research through their ICUREUS programme. The authors would also like to thank Carleton University’s Facilities Management and Planning group for their close cooperation and support in acquiring building consumption data for this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Government of Canada: Canada’s 2017 Nationally Determined Contribution submission to the United Nations Framework (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Environment and Climate Change Canada: Canada’s 2016 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reference Case. Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jordaan, S.M., Romo-Rabago, E., McLeary, R., Reidy, L., Nazari, J., Herremans, I.M.: The role of energy technology innovation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of Canada. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 1397–1409 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Natural Resources Canada: Energy Fact Book. Natural Resources Canada, Canada (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Environment and Climate Change Canada: Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Canada (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.05178-2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Natural Resources Canada: Improving Energy Performance in Canada. Natural Resources Canada, Canada (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hepbasli, A., Biyik, E., Ekren, O., Gunerhan, H., Araz, M.: A key review of wastewater source heat pump (WWSHP) systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 88, 700–722 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cipolla, S.S., Maglionico, M.: Heat recovery from urban wastewater: analysis of the variability of flow rate and temperature in the sewer of Bologna, Italy. Energy Proc. 45, 288–297 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertrand, A., Aggoune, R., Maréchal, F.: In-building waste water heat recovery: an urban-scale method for the characterisation of water streams and the assessment of energy savings and costs. Appl. Energy 203, 983 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallin, J., Claesson, J.: Investigating the efficiency of a vertical inline drain water heat recovery heat exchanger in a system boosted with a heat pump. Energy Build 80, 7–16 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dong, J., Zhang, Z., Yao, Y., Jiang, Y., Lei, B.: Experimental performance evaluation of a novel heat pump water heater assisted with shower drain water. Appl. Energy 154, 842–850 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    City of Vancouver: Neighbourhood Energy Utility. City of Vancouver, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    FVB Energy.: Southeast False Creek Neighbourhood Energy Utility. http://www.fvbenergy.com/projects/southeast-false-creek-neighbourhood-energy-utility/ (2018). Accessed 2 May 2018
  14. 14.
    Im, P., Liu, X., Henderson, H.: Operational performance characterization of a heat pump system utilizing recycled water as heat sink and heat source in a cool and dry climate. Energies 11, 211 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Office of Institutional Research and Planning: Facts and Figures Carleton University. https://carleton.ca/about/facts/ (2017). Accessed 1 May 2018
  16. 16.
    Fuentes, E., Arce, L., Salom, J.: A review of domestic hot water consumption profiles for application in systems and buildings energy performance analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1530–1547 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Symonds, G.: Carleton Facilites Management and Planning, Boiler Make-up Water. Personal Communication (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Macdonald, S.: Carleton Facilities Management and Planning, Waste Heat Recovery Project. Personal Communication (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Intertek Testing Services: Consumers’ Directory of Certified Efficiency Ratings for Heating and Water Heating Equipment. Intertek Testing Services, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biermayer P, Lutz J.: Gas water heater energy losses. EScholarship, 1–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aguilar, C., White, D.J., Ryan, D.L.: Domestic water heating and water heater energy consumption in Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dürrenmatt, D.J., Wanner, O.: A mathematical model to predict the effect of heat recovery on the wastewater temperature in sewers. Water Res. 48, 548–558 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    International Renewable Energy Agency: Renewable Energy in District Heating and Cooling, A Sector Roadmap for REmap. UAE, Abu Dhabi (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parker, S.A., Boyd, B.K., Hunt, W.D., Stoughton, K.L.M., Fowler, K.M., Koehler, T.M. et al: Metering Best Practices: A Guide to Achieving Utility Resource Efficiency, Release 3.0. (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barfuss, S., Johnson, M., Neilsen, M.: Accuracy of In-Service Water Meters at Low and High Flow Rates. Logan, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gruskos, R.: Utility Flow Metering for Steam and Heated/Chilled Water: A Tutorial. International District Energy Association (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Szyszko, G.: Energy and Flow Measurement for Hydronic Systems. Association of Energy Engineers Southern California (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    City Of Ottawa: Lemieux Water Purification Plant—2017 Drinking Water Quality. Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    City Of Ottawa: Britannia Water Purification Plant—2017 Drinking Water Quality. Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy: Purchasing Energy-Efficient Commercial Boilers. Washington DC, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lunt, J.: Condensing storage water heaters. J Light Constr. 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    SHARC Energy Systems: Technical Information: SHARC 660SS Wastewater Solids Filter. Canada (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maritime Geothermal: Engineering Specification: High Temperature Water to Water Heat Pump. New Brunswick (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mitsubishi Heavy Industries: Water to Water Centrifugal Heat Pump; Heat Recovery Type. Japan (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Janna, W.S.: Design of Fluid Thermal Systems, Third. Cengage Learning, Stamford, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cat Pumps: Pumps and Accessories Price List. Minneapolis, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jenkins, G., Kuo, C-Y.: The economic opportunity cost of capital for Canada—An empirical update. Discount Rates Eval. Public Priv. Partnerships, Kingston, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    State of Michigan: Miscellaneous Industrial Costs, vol. 12. Lansing, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thomson, J.A.: National Plumbing & HVAC Estimator. Associated General Contractors of America, Carlsbad, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    US Energy Information Administration: Updated Buildings Sector Appliance and Equipment Costs and Efficiency (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duquette, J.: Carleton University, Cost Data. Personal Communication (2018)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abdelalim, A., O’Brien, W., Shi, Z.: Visualization of energy and water consumption and GHG emissions: a case study of a Canadian University Campus. Energy Build 109, 334–352 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ontario Ministry of Energy: Ontario’s Long Term Energy Plan: Delivering Fairness and Choice. Ontario, Toronto (2017)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    World Bank: Commodity Markets Outlook—World Bank. Washington DC, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    SHARC Energy Systems: Case Study 1 Sharc System—Leisure Centre. Nottingham (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    United States Department of Energy: Geothermal Heat Pumps 2018, pp. 10–3. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/heat-and-cool/heat-pump-systems/geothermal-heat-pumps (2018). Accessed 11 April 2018
  47. 47.
    The Atmospheric Fund: A clearer view on Ontario’s emissions: practice guidelines for electricity emissions factors (2017)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards AP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. North Carolina (1995)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    US Environmental Protection Agency: Overview of Greenhouse Gases 2018, p. 5. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#methane (2018). Accessed 12 April 2018
  50. 50.
    ASHRAE: ASHRAE Handbook—Service water heating. ASHRAE (2015)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dewerth, D., Becker, B.: Comparison of collected and compiled existing data on service hot water use patterns in residential and commercial establishments (1993)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carleton University: Carleton Dining Services 2018. https://dining.carleton.ca/ (2018). Accessed 2 May 2018
  53. 53.
    Culha, O., Gunerhan, H., Biyik, E., Ekren, O., Hepbasli, A.: Heat exchanger applications in wastewater source heat pumps for buildings: a key review. Energy Build 104, 215–232 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Environment and Climate Change Canada: Technical Paper on the Federal Carbon Pricing Backstop 2017, p. 26 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations