Combustion Characteristics and Emissions of Direct Injection Neat n-Butanol in a Compression Ignition Engine

  • Zhenyi Yang
  • Xiaoye Han
  • Shui Yu
  • Shouvik Dev
  • Graham Reader
  • David S-K Ting
  • Ming Zheng
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


Internal combustion engines have been the major power source in the transportation sector for decades. Despite the recent developments in electric vehicles, internal combustion engines will continue to be one of the main propulsion methods for transportation sector, especially in heavy-duty applications. In order to maintain the competitiveness of internal combustion engines, renewable biofuels have been proposed to replace fossil fuels for internal combustion. The application of biofuels can greatly reduce the crisis of fossil fuel shortage and it is beneficial for reducing the life cycle carbon dioxide emissions. In this research, direct injection of neat n-butanol fuel is investigated in a compression ignition research engine. The combustion characteristics of n-butanol differ from that of diesel fuel by the longer ignition delay, shorter combustion duration, higher pressure rise rate, and narrower injection timing window. The NOx and smoke emissions from n-butanol combustion are significantly lower than those of diesel combustion. Different engine loads ranging from 2 bar to 7.5 bar are achieved with n-butanol combustion without the application of EGR. The combustion becomes more intensive with increased load, and the operation timing window is narrower due to the limits imposed by the high-pressure rise rate. To slow down the pressure rise rate, 30% EGR is applied under a load level of 6.5 bar IMEP. It is shown that EGR is not only effective in reducing the pressure rise rate but also beneficial for further reducing the NOx emissions. An EGR sweep experiment is carried out at a higher engine load of 10 bar IMEP with a CA50 of 365 °CA. Though the pressure rise rate decreases with the increase in EGR ratio, a significant increase in smoke emissions is observed when the EGR ratio increases above 35%. The trade-off between smoke emissions and the pressure rise rate can be alleviated by retarding the combustion phasing, but with a penalty of reduced indicated thermal efficiency.



This research is supported by NSERC CRD, APC, Discovery, CRC, CREATE programs; the CFI-ORF New Initiative Program; the NCE BioFuelNet programs; the Ford Motor Company, and the University of Windsor.


  1. 1.
    U.S Energy Information Administration: Annual Energy Outlook (2018). Accessed 02 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Salvi, B.L., Subramanian, K.A., Panwar, N.L.: Alternative fuels for transportation vehicles: a technical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25, 404–419 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alternative Fuels Data Center: Maps and Data. Accessed 02 May 2018
  4. 4.
    Han, X., Zheng, M., Wang, J.: Fuel suitability for low temperature combustion in compression ignition engines. Fuel 109, 336–349 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, X., Han, D., Huang, Z.: Fuel design and management for the control of advanced compression-ignition combustion modes. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37(6), 741–783 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dec, J.E.: Advanced compression-ignition engines—understanding the in-cylinder processes. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32(2), 2727–2742 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rakopoulos, D.C., Rakopoulos, C.D., Papagiannakis, R.G., Kyritsis, D.C.: Combustion heat release analysis of ethanol or n-butanol diesel fuel blends in heavy-duty DI diesel engine. Fuel 90(5), 1855–1867 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rakopoulos, D.C., Rakopoulos, C.D., Giakoumis, E.G., Dimaratos, A.M., Kyritsis, D.C.: Effects of butanol–diesel fuel blends on the performance and emissions of a high-speed DI diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 51(10), 1989–1997 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rakopoulos, D.C., Rakopoulos, C.D., Hountalas, D.T., Kakaras, E.C., Giakoumis, E.G., Papagiannakis, R.G.: Investigation of the performance and emissions of bus engine operating on butanol/diesel fuel blends. Fuel 89(10), 2781–2790 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choi, B., Jiang, X., Kim, Y.K., Jung, G., Lee, C., Choi, I., Song, C.S.: Effect of diesel fuel blend with n-butanol on the emission of a turbocharged common rail direct injection diesel engine. Appl. Energy 146, 20–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abu-Qudais, M., Haddad, O., Qudaisat, M.: The effect of alcohol fumigation on diesel engine performance and emissions. Energy Convers. Manag. 41(4), 389–399 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajesh Kumar, B., Saravanan, S.: Effects of iso-butanol/diesel and n-pentanol/diesel blends on performance and emissions of a DI diesel engine under premixed LTC (low temperature combustion) mode. Fuel 170, 49–59 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen, A.: Ethanol-diesel fuel blends - a review. Bioresour. Technol. 96(3), 277–285 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xing-cai, L., Jian-guang, Y., Wu-gao, Z., Zhen, H.: Effect of cetane number improver on heat release rate and emissions of high speed diesel engine fueled with ethanol–diesel blend fuel. Fuel 83(14–15), 2013–2020 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iannuzzi, S.E., Valentino, G.: Comparative behavior of gasoline–diesel/butanol–diesel blends and injection strategy management on performance and emissions of a light duty diesel engine. Energy 71, 321–331 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, Z., Liu, J., Han, Z., Du, B., Liu, Y., Lee, C.: Study on performance and emissions of a passenger-car diesel engine fueled with butanol–diesel blends. Energy 55, 638–646 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maurya, R.K., Agarwal, A.K.: Experimental investigation on the effect of intake air temperature and air–fuel ratio on cycle-to-cycle variations of HCCI combustion and performance parameters. Appl. Energy 88(4), 1153–1163 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saxena, S., Vuilleumier, D., Kozarac, D., Krieck, M., Dibble, R., Aceves, S.: Optimal operating conditions for wet ethanol in a HCCI engine using exhaust gas heat recovery. Appl. Energy 116, 269–277 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng, M., Li, T., Han, X.: Direct injection of neat n-butanol for enabling clean low temperature combustion in a modern diesel engine. Fuel 142, 28–37 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bahri, B., Aziz, A.A., Shahbakhti, M., Muhamad Said, M.F.: Understanding and detecting misfire in an HCCI engine fuelled with ethanol. Appl. Energy 108, 24–33 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sjöberg, M., Dec, J.E.: Effects of EGR and its constituents on HCCI auto ignition of ethanol. Proc. Combust. Inst. 33(2), 3031–3038 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng, M., Han, X., Asad, U., Wang, J.: Investigation of butanol-fuelled HCCI combustion on a high efficiency diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 98, 215–224 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maurya, R.K., Agarwal, A.K.: Experimental investigations of performance, combustion and emission characteristics of ethanol and methanol fueled HCCI engine. Fuel Process. Technol. 126, 30–48 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maurya, R.K., Agarwal, A.K.: Experimental study of combustion and emission characteristics of ethanol fuelled port injected homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion engine. Appl. Energy 88(4), 1169–1180 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu, M.-B., He, B.-Q., Zhao, H.: Effect of air dilution and effective compression ratio on the combustion characteristics of a HCCI (homogeneous charge compression ignition) engine fuelled with n-butanol. Energy 85, 296–303 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jeftić, M., Yang, Z., Reader, G.T., Zheng, M.: Fuel efficiency analysis and peak pressure rise rate improvement for neat n-butanol injection strategies. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 231(1), 50–65 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Han, X., Yang, Z., Wang, M., et al.: Clean combustion of n-butanol as a next generation biofuel for diesel engines. Appl. Energy 198, 347–359 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, S., Zheng, M.: Ethanol–diesel premixed charge compression ignition to achieve clean combustion under high loads. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D J. Automob. Eng. 230(4), 527–541 (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zheng, C., Liu, J., Wu, Z., Lee, C.: Effects of port fuel injection (PFI) of n-butanol and EGR on combustion and emissions of a direct injection diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manage. 76, 725–731 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu, Y., Zheng, C., Liu, J.: Emission, efficiency, and influence in a diesel n-butanol dual-injection engine. Energy Convers. Manage. 87, 385–391 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhenyi Yang
    • 1
  • Xiaoye Han
    • 1
  • Shui Yu
    • 1
  • Shouvik Dev
    • 1
  • Graham Reader
    • 1
  • David S-K Ting
    • 1
  • Ming Zheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations