Advertisement

Nationality Board Diversity in Organizations: A Brief Review and Future Research Directions

  • Fabrizio Maturo
  • Stefania Migliori
  • Francesco Paolone
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 179)

Abstract

In recent decades, many studies have focused on the issue of diversity in organizations due to the increasing interest on its possible impact on firms’ performance and other organizational aspects. Because of the growing globalized markets, greater mobility, and demographic developments which are bringing more people to work with others who differ in cultural, demographic, informational, and personality attributes, scholars have concentrated on various type of team variety within organizations, e.g. gender, nationality, educational, age, ethnicity, and race. Despite the different goals of these researches, most insiders agree that diversity plays an essential role for the efficacy of management and decisions, long term prosperity, and ability to develop relationships with the external environment. Nevertheless, the findings of many studies are conflicting and suggest a negative role of diversity. For these reasons, this paper, focusing on one aspect of organizational variety, i.e. nationality diversity, aims to propose a brief review of the main existing studies on this topic. The final purpose of this contribution is to discuss and understand what are the results and limits of these studies.

Keywords

Nationality board diversity Board diversity Firm diversity Firm heterogeneity Corporate diversity 

References

  1. Ararat, M., Aksu, M., Tansel Cetin, A.: How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corp. Gov. (Oxford) 23(2), 83–103 (2015). www.scopus.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnegger, M., Hofmann, C., Pull, K., Vetter, K.: Firm size and board diversity. J. Manage. Gov. 18(4), 1109–1135 (May 2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9273-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayuso, S., Argandoña, A.: Responsible corporate governance: towards a stakeholder board of directors? Corp. Owner. Control 6(4) (2009).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i4p1
  4. Barako, G., Brown, A.: Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. J. Manage. Gov. 12(4), 309–324 (May 2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9053-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., Labelle, R.: What makes better boards? a closer look at diversity and ownership. Brit. J. Manage. 24(1), 85–101 (Nov 2011).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00789.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berle, A., Means, G.: The modern corporation and private property. Macmillan, N.Y. (1932)Google Scholar
  7. Biemann, T., Kearney, E.: Size does matter: how varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Org. Res. Methods 13(3), 582–599 (Jul 2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109338875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau, P.: Inequality and heterogeneity. Free Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  9. Brickley, J.A., Zimmerman, J.L.: Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber. SSRN Electron. J. (2010).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681030
  10. Bronzetti, G., Mazzotta, R., Sicoli, G.: Governance, board diversity and firm value: the case of the Italian publicly listed firms. Corp. Owner. Control 8(1) (2010).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i1c6p5
  11. Chen, C.-W., Lin, J.B., Yi, B.: CEO duality and firm performance—an endogenous issue. Corp. Owner. Control (2008).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i1p6
  12. Darmadi, S.: Board diversity and firm performance: the Indonesian evidence. Corp. Owner. Control 8(2) (2011).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c4p4
  13. Davis, J., Donaldson, F.S.L.: Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad. Manage. Rev. 22(1), 20–47 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., Maturo, F.: Parametric functional analysis of variance for fish biodiversity. In: International Conference on Marine and Freshwater Environments, iMFE 2014 (2014). www.scopus.com
  15. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., Maturo, F.: Environmental monitoring through functional biodiversity tools. Ecol. Ind. 60, 237–247 (2016a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., Maturo, F.: Parametric functional analysis of variance for fish biodiversity assessment. J. Environ. Inf. 28(2), 101–109 (2016b).  https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201600348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., Maturo, F.: BioFTF: an R package for biodiversity assessment with the functional data analysis approach. Ecol. Ind. 73, 726–732 (Feb 2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaldson, L., Davis, J.: Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Aust. J. Manage. 16(1), 49–64 (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Estélyi, K.S., Nisar, T.M.: Diverse boards: why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards? J. Corp. Fin. 39, 174–192 (Aug 2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eulerich, M., Velte, P., Uum van, C.: The impact of management board diversity on corporate performance—an empirical analysis for the German two-tier system. Prob. Persp. Manage. 12(1), 25–39 (2014). ISSN 1727-7051Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. Diversity within small and medium-sized enterprises—best practices and approaches for moving ahead. Brussels (2015)Google Scholar
  22. García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I.-M., Martínez-Ferrero, J.: Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: an international analysis. J. Bank. Fin. 53, 202–214 (Apr 2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hahn, P., Lasfer, M.: Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. Int. Rev. Fin. Anal. 46, 295–308 (Jul 2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, D.A., Klein, K.J.: What’s the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32(4), 1199–1228 (2007). www.scopus.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herfindahl, O.: Concentration in the Steel Industry. Columbia University (1950). https://books.google.it/books?id=vsZ4YgEACAAJ
  26. Hill, M.: Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427–432 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hillman, A.J., Cannella, A.A., Paetzold, R.L.: The resource dependence role of corporate directors: strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. J. Manage. Stud. 37(2), 235–256 (Mar 2000).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirschman, A.O.: The paternity of an index. Am. Econ. Rev. 54(5), 761–762 (1964). ISSN 00028282.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1818582
  29. Hoang, T.C., Abeysekera, I., Ma, S.: The effect of board diversity on earnings quality: an empirical study of listed firms in Vietnam. Aust. Acc. Rev. 27(2), 146–163 (Dec 2016).  https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Fin. Econ. 3(4), 305–360 (Oct 1976). ISSN 0304405X.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., Pye, A.: Antecedents of board composition: the role of nomination committees. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 20(5), 474–489 (May 2012).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00913.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matari, E.M.A., Swidi, A.K.A., Fadzil, F.H.B.: The moderating effect of board diversity on the relationship between executive committee characteristics and firm performance in Oman: empirical study. Asian Soc. Sci. 10(12) (May 2014).  https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n12p6
  33. Maturo, F., Di Battista, T.: A functional approach to Hill’s numbers for assessing changes in species variety of ecological communities over time. Ecol. Ind. 84, 70 – 81 (2018). ISSN 1470-160X.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.016, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X17304934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maturo, F., Migliori, S., Consorti, A.: Corporate board diversity. In: Haller, A., Galea, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference “Humanities and Social Sciences Today.” Economics, pp. 113–124. Pro Universitaria, Bucharest (2015)Google Scholar
  35. Maturo, F., Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F.: Biodiversity assessment using functional tool. R package BioFTF (2016)Google Scholar
  36. Maturo, F., Migliori, S., Paolone, F.: Do institutional or foreign shareholders influence national board diversity? assessing board diversity through functional data analysis, pp. 199–217. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayo, M., van Knippenberg, D., Guillén, L., Firfiray, S.: Team diversity and categorization salience. Org. Res. Methods 19(3), 433–474 (Jul 2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oxelheim, L., Randøy, T.: The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. J. Bank. Fin. 27(12), 2369–2392 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(02)00395-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patil, G., Taillie, C.: An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J., Patil, G., Smith, W., Taillie, C. (eds.) Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, pp. 23–48. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD (1979)Google Scholar
  40. Patil, G., Taillie, C.: Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77, 548–567 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfeffer, J., Langton, N.: The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: evidence from college and university faculty. Adm. Sci. Quart. 38(3), 382 (Sept 1993).  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pielou, E.: Ecological Diversity. Wiley, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  43. Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., Oxelheim, L.: A nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Age 390(0.5428) (2006)Google Scholar
  44. Ricotta, C., Corona, P., Marchetti, M., Chirici, G., Innamorati, S.: LaDy: software for assessing local landscape diversity profiles of raster land cover maps using geographic windows. Environ. Model. Softw. 18, 373–378 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rose, C.: Does female board representation influence firm performance? the Danish evidence. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 15(2), 404–413 (Mar 2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S.: Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 15(4), 546–557 (Jul 2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00587.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Santen, B., Donker, H.: Board diversity in the perspective of financial distress: empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Corp. Board Role Duties Comp. 5(2) (2009).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv5i2art3
  48. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shehata, N.F.: How could board diversity influence corporate disclosure? Corp. Board Role Duties Comp. 9(3) (2013).  https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv9i3art4
  50. Simpson, E.: Measurement of diversity. Nat. 163, 688 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teachman, J.D.: Analysis of population diversity. Sociol. Methods Res. 8(3), 341–362 (Feb 1980).  https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418000800305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ujunwa, A.: Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 12(5), 656–674 (Oct 2012).  https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211275587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urban, R., Hošková-Mayerová, Š.: Threat life cycle and its dynamics. Deturope 9(2), 93–109 (2017). ISSN 1821-2506Google Scholar
  54. Vallejo Andrada, A., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Krahulec, J., Sarasola Sanchez-Serrano, J.L.: Risks associated with reality: how society views the current wave of migration: one common problem—two different solutions. Springer International Publishing, pp. 283–305 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M.C.: Work group diversity. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 58(1), 515–541 (Jan 2007).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrizio Maturo
    • 1
  • Stefania Migliori
    • 1
  • Francesco Paolone
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management and Business Administration“G. D’ Annunzio” University of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration“Parthenope” University of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations