Metadata Analysis of Scholarly Events of Computer Science, Physics, Engineering, and Mathematics
Although digitization has significantly eased publishing, finding a relevant and a suitable channel of publishing remains challenging. Scientific events such as conferences, workshops or symposia are among the most popular channels, especially in computer science, natural sciences, and technology. To obtain a better understanding of scholarly communication in different fields and the role of scientific events, metadata of scientific events of four research communities have analyzed: Computer Science, Physics, Engineering, and Mathematics. Our transferable analysis methodology is based on descriptive statistics as well as exploratory data analysis. Metadata used in this work have been collected from the OpenResearch.org community platform and SCImago as the main resources containing metadata of scientific events in a semantically structured way. There is no comprehensive information about submission numbers and acceptance rates in fields other than Computer Science. The evaluation uses metrics such as continuity, geographical and time-wise distribution, field popularity and productivity as well as event progress ratio and rankings based on the SJR indicator and h5-indices. Recommendations for different stakeholders involved in the life cycle of events, such as chairs, potential authors, and sponsors, are given.
KeywordsScientific events Metadata analysis Scholarly communication Citation count OpenResearch.org
Said Fathalla would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) of Egypt for providing a scholarship to conduct this study. I would like to offer my special thanks to Heba Mohamed for her support in data gathering process.
- 5.Fathalla, S., Lange, C.: EVENTS: a dataset on the history of top-prestigious events in five computer science communities. In: Workshop on Semantics, Analytics, Visualization: Enhancing Scholarly Dissemination. Springer, Heidelberg (2018, in press)Google Scholar
- 6.Fathalla, S., Lange, C.: EVENTSKG: a knowledge graph representation for top- prestigious computer science events metadata. In: Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence Technologies and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2018, in press)Google Scholar
- 7.Fathalla, S., Vahdati, S., Lange, C., Auer, S.: Analysing scholarly communication metadata of computer science events. In: Kamps, J., Tsakonas, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Iliadis, L., Karydis, I. (eds.) TPDL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10450, pp. 342–354. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V.P., Moya-Anegón, F.: A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J. Inf. 4(3), 379–391 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.Hiemstra, D., Hauff, C., De Jong, F., Kraaij, W.: SIGIR’s 30th anniversary: an analysis of trends in IR research and the topology of its community. In: ACM SIGIR Forum, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 18–24. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Vahdati, S., Arndt, N., Auer, S., Lange, C.: OpenResearch: collaborative management of scholarly communication metadata. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 778–793. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_50CrossRefGoogle Scholar