Advertisement

Implementation of ICT for Active and Healthy Ageing: Comparing Value-Based Objectives Between Polish and Swedish Seniors

  • Ella KolkowskaEmail author
  • Ewa Soja
  • Piotr Soja
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 333)

Abstract

Active and healthy ageing strategies are proposed in many European countries to address the challenges generated by ageing of the populations. Information and communication technology (ICT) plays an important role in the implementation of these strategies. By applying Value-focused thinking approach, this qualitative study investigates what objectives are important for successful implementation of ICT for active and healthy ageing according to older people in Sweden and Poland. The study shows that there are both differences and similarities between the objectives identified in these two countries that may have significant implications for development (analysis and design) and implementation of ICT solutions for active and healthy ageing.

Keywords

ICT Active and healthy ageing Value-based thinking Poland Sweden 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been financed in part by the funds granted to the Faculty of Management, Cracow University of Economics, Poland, within the subsidy for maintaining research potential.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloom, D.E., et al.: Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet 385(9968), 649–657 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission: Access to healthcare and long-term care: equal for women and men? Final synthesis report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission: The 2015 ageing report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU member states (2013–2060). European Economy 3 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission: The 2018 ageing report. Underlying assumptions and projection methodologies. European Economy Institutional Paper 065 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Foster, L., Walker, A.: Active and successful aging: a European policy perspective. Gerontologist 55(1), 83–90 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gregory, R., Keeney, R.L.: Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manag. Sci. 40(8), 1035–1048 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harper, S.: Economic and social implications of aging societies. Science 346(6209), 587–591 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iakovidis, I.: The European dimension of eHealth: challenges of innovation. Int. J. Healthc. Manag. 5(4), 223–230 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapadia, V., Ariani, A., Li, J., Ray, P.K.: Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84, 892–900 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keeney, R.L.: Creativity in decision making with value-focused thinking. Sloan Manag. Rev. 35, 33–41 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klimczuk, A.: Comparative analysis of national and regional models of the silver economy in the European Union. Int. J. Ageing Later Life 10(2), 31–59 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolkowska, E., Avatare Nöu, A., Sjölinder, M., Scandurra, I.: Socio-technical challenges in implementation of monitoring technologies in elderly care. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9755, pp. 45–56. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolkowska, E., Soja, E.: Attitudes towards ICT solutions for independent living among older adults in Sweden and Poland: a preliminary study. In: Kowal, J., Kuzio, A., Mäkiö, J., Paliwoda-Pękosz, G., Soja, P., Sonntag, R. (eds.) 2017 Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT Management for Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies, ICTM 5/2017, Wrocław, Poland, 23–24 October 2017, pp. 35–45. University of Wrocław, Wrocław (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peek, S.T.M., et al.: Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 62(2), 226–237 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potocnik, K.: Healthy ageing and well-being at work. In: Parry, E., McCarthy, J. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Age Diversity and Work, pp. 171–194. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46781-2_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Social Protection Committee and European Commission: Adequate social protection for long-term care needs in an ageing society. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soja, E.: Information and communication technology in active and healthy ageing: exploring risks from multi-generation perspective. Inf. Syst. Manag. 34(4), 320–332 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soja, E.: Supporting active ageing: challenges and opportunities for information and communication technology. Zarządzanie i Finanse J. Manag. Finan. 15(1/2017), 109–125 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walker, A., Maltby, T.: Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int. J. Soc. Welf. 21(1), 117–130 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization (WHO): World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization, Geneva (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zacher, H., Kooij, D.T.A.M., Beier, M.E.: Successful aging at work: empirical and methodological advancements. Work Aging Retire. 4(2), 123–128 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Empirical Research in Information Systems (CERIS)Örebro University School of BusinessÖrebroSweden
  2. 2.Department of DemographyCracow University of EconomicsKrakówPoland
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceCracow University of EconomicsKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations