Prise en charge des patientes exposées in utero au DES, l’expérience de Port-Royal

Mangan CE, Burnett-Rubin MM, Egan V et al. (1982) Pregnancy outcome in 98 women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero, their mothers, and unexposed sibling. Obstet Gynecol 59: 315–9PubMedGoogle Scholar

Klip H, Verloop J, D van Gool J et al. (2002) Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero: a cohort study. Lancet 359: 1102–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epelboin S. Communication personnelleGoogle Scholar

Brouwers MM, Feitz WF, Roelofs LA et al. (2006) Hypospadias: a transgenerational effect of diethylstilbestrol? Hum Reprod 21: 666–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer JR, Wise LA, Robboy SJ et al. (2005) Hypospadias in sons of women exposed to diethyistilbestrol in utero. Epidemiology 16: 583–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newbold RR, Hanson RB, Jefferson WN et al. (1998) Increased tumors but uncompromised fertility in the female descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol. Carcinogenesis 19: 1655–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newbold RR, Hanson RB, Jefferson WN et al. (2000) Proliferative lesions and reproductive tract tumors in male descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol. Carcinogenesis 21: 1355–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman RH, Adam E (2002) Findings in female offspring of women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Obstet Gynecol 99: 197–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar