Nursing Informatics pp 343-354

Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Local Global Access: Virtual Learning Environment

  • Beth L. Elias
  • Jacqueline A. Moss
  • Christel Anderson
  • Teresa McCasky


A few years ago, during the American Informatics Medical Association’s annual conference keynote address, Dr. David Brailer spoke about the importance of integrating information technology (IT) in healthcare. His remarks included the old saying about how a rising tide floats all boats. This adage prompted a discussion between nursing informatics leaders at the conference on the kind of nursing boats that could be launched on this rising tide. Nurses have long embraced the use of technology in practice and have been leaders in the use of technology in education.1 However, there are some gaps in the informatics and information literacy competencies we teach in nursing education that are needed for effective nursing practice (Pravikoff et al 2005 and Jensen 2009). The nurses hearing Dr. Brailer saw the need to organize a concerted effort to integrate the use of IT into practice and education in the future. It is this rising tide of nursing practice incorporating new technologies that will “float the boat” of healthcare information technology (HIT) adoption.


  1. 1.
    Weiner E. Technology: the interface to nursing educational informatics. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;43(4):ix-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    TIGER. TIGER Report Evidence and Informatics Transforming Nursing: 3-Year Action Steps toward a 10-Year Vision.; 2007 Accessed 08.07.09.
  3. 3.
    Russell CK, Burchum JR, Likes WM, et al. WebQuests: creating engaging, student-centered, constructivist learning activities. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26:78-87; quiz 88-79.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sockolow P, Bowles KH. Including information technology project management in the nursing informatics curriculum. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26:14-20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tarrant M, Dodgson JE, Law BV. A curricular approach to improve the information literacy and academic writing skills of part-time post-registration nursing students in Hong Kong. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28:458-468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gassert CA. Technology and informatics competencies. Nurs Clin North Am. 2008;43:507-521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siemens AG. Clinical Gateway. Available from URL:; 2009 Accessed 05.07.09.
  9. 9.
    University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System (n.d.); 2009 Accessed 05.07.09.
  10. 10.
    Microsoft Patient Journey Demonstrator. Available from URL; 2009 Accessed 05.07.09.
  11. 11.
    The LISTEN Project. Available from URL; 2009 Accessed 05.07.09.
  12. 12.
    TIGER. Virtual Demonstration Collaborative.; 2009 Accessed 08.07.09.
  13. 13.
    Kaiser Permanente. Available from URL; 2009 Accessed 05.07.09.
  14. 14.
    Melo D, Carlton KH. A collaborative model to ensure graduating nurses are ready to use electronic health records. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;26:8-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vestal V, Krautwurst N, Hack R. A model for incorporating technology into student nurse clinical. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26:2-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    HIMSS Virtual Conference & Expo.; 2009 Accessed 08.07.09.
  17. 17.
    Struck C, Moss J. Focus on Technology: What can you do to move the vision forward? Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27(3):192-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen R, Meyer L, Sternberger C. Three technological enhancements in nursing education: Informatics instruction, personal response systems, and human patient simulation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009;9:86-90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Assessing medical residents’ usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73:25-34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simpson RL. Welcome to the virtual classroom. How technology is transforming nursing education in the 21st century. Nurs Adm Q. 2003;27:83-86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Green SM, Weaver M, Voegeli D, et al. The development and evaluation of the use of a virtual learning environment (Blackboard 5) to support the learning of pre-qualifying nursing students undertaking a human anatomy and physiology module. Nurse Educ Today. 2006;26:388-395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jeffries P, Rizzolo M. Designing and implementing models for innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. Summary Report: National League for Nursing; 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alinier G, Hunt W, Gordon R. Determining the value of simulation in nurse education: study design and initial results. Nurse Educ Pract. 2004;4:200-207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steadman R, Coates W, Huang YM, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151-157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pravikoff DS, Tanner AB, Pierce ST. Readiness of U.S. nurses for evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(9):40-51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth L. Elias
    • 1
  • Jacqueline A. Moss
  • Christel Anderson
  • Teresa McCasky
  1. 1.School of Nursing Department of Community Health, Outcomes and SystemsThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations