Advertisement

Emerging Interoperability Directions in Electronic Government

  • Yannis Charalabidis
  • Fenareti Lampathaki
  • Dimitris Askounis

Abstract

Being important at organizational, process and semantic levels, interoperability became a key characteristic of the new electronic government systems and services, over the last decade. As a crucial prerequisite for automated process execution leading to “one-stop” e-Government services, interoperability has been systematically prescribed, since the dawn of the 21st century: Standardization frameworks, that included guidelines ranging from simple statements to well defined international Web-Service standards started to appear at National and Cross-Country levels, powered by governments, the European Union or the United Nations. In parallel, most international software, hardware and service vendors created their own strategies for achieving the goal of open, collaborative, loosely coupled systems and components. The paper presents the main milestones in this quest that shaped electronic government during the last years, describing National Frameworks, key Pan- European projects, international standardization and main industrial and research achievements in the EU. Moreover, the paper describes the next steps needed to promote interoperability at technical, semantic, organizational, legal or policy level – leading to the transformation of administrative processes and the provision of low-cost, high-quality services to citizens and businesses.

Keywords

Public Administration Electronic Government Interoperability Standardization Ministerial Declaration Interoperability Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Al-Kibsi G, de Boer K, Mourshed M and Rea N (2001) Putting Citizens Online not in Line. The McKinsey Quarterly 2, 65-73.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Capgemini, Rand Europe, IDC, Sogeti and DTI (2009) Smarter, Faster, Better eGovernment, 8th Edition, Available at: http://www.epractice.eu/files/Smarter,%20Faster,%20Better%20eGovernment%20-%208th%20Benchmark%20Measurement.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Charalabidis, Y., Gionis, G., Moritz Hermann, K. and Martinez, C. (2008) Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap, Draft Version 5.0, Available at: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/enet/ei-roadmap-5-0-draft_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Charalabidis Y, Lampathaki F, Kavalaki A and Askounis D (2009) A Review of Interoperability Frameworks: Patterns and Challenges. International Journal of Electronic Governance, Inderscience Publications, Article in Press.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Charalabidis Y, Lampathaki F, Askounis D (2009) A Comparative Analysis of National e-Government Interoperability Frameworks, in Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Francisco, August 2009, AIS Electronic LibraryGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006a) i2010 e-Government Action Plan: Accelerating e-Government in Europe for the Benefit of All, COM (2006) 173 final, Available at: http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0173en01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006b) Interoperability for Pan-European eGovernment Services, COM (2006) 45 final, Available at: http://europa.eu.int/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=24117Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    eGovernment Economics Project (eGEP) (2006) Expenditure Study, Final Version, http://82.187.13.175/eGEP/Static/Contents/final/D.1.3Expenditure_Study_final_versi on.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    eGovernment Sub-group (2009) Visions and priorities for eGovernment in Europe: Orientations for a post 2010 eGovernment Action Plan, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/egovernment/docs/2015_backgroun d_doc-210-pvt.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    European Commission (2008) Unleashing the Potential of the European Knowledge Economy Value Proposition for Enterprise Interoperability, Version 4.0Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gottschalk P (2009) Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly 26 (1), 75-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Heeks R and Bailura S (2007) Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24 (2), 243-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    IDABC (2008) European Interoperability Framework draft version 2.0, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=31508Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Irani Z, Love P and Montazemi A (2007) e-Government: past, present and future. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (2), 103-105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Jakobs K (2006) ICT Standards Development — Finding the Best Platform. In Enterprise Interoperability: New Challenges and Approaches (Doumeingts G, Müller J, Morel G, Vallespir B, Eds.), 543-552 & Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications (I-ESA 06).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Klischewski R (2004) Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration. In Proceedings of EGOV 2004 Conference (Traunmüller R, Ed), LNCS 3183, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Layne K and Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18, 122-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Legner C and Lebreton B (2007) Business Interoperability Research: Present Achievements and Upcoming Challenges. Electronic Markets 17 (3), 176 - 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Malotaux M, Hahndiek F, Hazejager S (2009) National Interoperability Frameworks Observatory (NIFO Project), http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=32120Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment (2009) approved unanimously in Malmö, Sweden, http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.24306!menu/standard/file/Ministerial%20Declar ation%20on%20eGovernment.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    MODINIS (2007) Study on Interoperability at Local and Regional Level, Version 2.0, Available at: http://www.epractice.eu/files/media/media1309.pdfGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ralyte J, Jeusfeld M, Backlund P, Kuhn H and Arni-Bloch N (2008) A knowledgebased approach to manage information systems interoperability. Information Systems, 33, 754–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Scholl HJ and Klischewski R (2007) E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda. International Journal of Public Administration 30 (8), 889–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ziemann J, Matheis T and Werth D (2008) Conceiving interoperability between public authorities - A methodical framework. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2007) e-Government Interoperability: A Review of Government Interoperability Frameworks in Selected Countries, Available at: http://www.apdip.net/projects/gif/serieslaunchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yannis Charalabidis
    • 1
  • Fenareti Lampathaki
    • 1
  • Dimitris Askounis
    • 1
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations