An Ontology Proposal for Resilient Multi-plant Networks

  • Rubén Darío Franco
  • Guillermo Prats
  • Rubén de Juan-Marín


This paper presents an ontology proposal for the REMPLANET FP7 project which aims at developing methods, guidelines and tools for the implementation of the Resilient Multi-Plant Networks in non-hierarchical manufacturing networks, characterized by noncentralized decision making. Due to structural heterogeneity of REMPLANET integration scenarios, an ontological approach seems to be a first key challenge to be addressed. Consequently, one of the main contributions of this paper is to provide an initial ontological approach, intended to harmonize domain concepts and their relationships.


Supply Chain Open Innovation Mass Customization Manufacturing Network Data Interoperability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    H. Chesbrough, The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    IDEAS, “Interoperability Developments for Enterprise Application and Software - roadmaps,” 2005.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    INTEROP - DI.1b, “Deliverable DI.1b: Interoperability Knowledge corpus,” IST-1-508011: Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software (INTEROP), 2006.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Poler, J.V. Tomás and P. Velardi, “Interoperability Glossary,” Deliverable 10.1, Interop Network of Excellence., 2005.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Naudet, T. Latour, K. Hausmann, S. Abels, A. Hahn and P. Johannnesonn, “Describing Interoperability: the OoI Ontology,” In Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability (EMOI-INTEROP), 2006.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Chen and F. Vernadat, “Enterprise Interoperability: A Standardisation View Interand-Intra Organizational Integration,” K. Kosante et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pages. 273-282.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Chen and F. Vernadat, “Standards on enterprise integration and engineering - A state of the art.,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing (IJCIM), vol. 17(3), 2004, pages. 235-253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Chen and N. Daclin, “Framework for Enterprise Interoperability,” IFAC EI2N Bordeaux, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Chen, “Enterprise Interoperability Framework,” INTEROP Network of Excellence, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T.R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, 1993, pages. 199 – 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Gruninger and M.S. Fox, “Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies,” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, “Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications,” To appear in Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 11, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    N. Bieberstein, S. Bose, M. Fiammante, K. Jones, y R. Shah, Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Compass, IBM Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubén Darío Franco
    • 1
  • Guillermo Prats
    • 1
  • Rubén de Juan-Marín
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación, Gestión e Ingeniería de ProducciónUniv. Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Instituto Tecnológico de InformáticaUniv. Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations