Tabletop Games: Platforms, Experimental Games and Design Recommendations
- 821 Downloads
While the last decade has seen massive improvements in not only the rendering quality, but also the overall performance of console and desktop video games, these improvements have not necessarily led to a greater population of video game players. In addition to continuing these improvements, the video game industry is also constantly searching for new ways to convert non-players into dedicated gamers. Despite the growing popularity of computer-based video games, people still love to play traditional board games, such as Risk, Monopoly, and Trivial Pursuit. Both video and board games have their strengths and weaknesses, and an intriguing conclusion is to merge both worlds. We believe that a tabletop form-factor provides an ideal interface for digital board games. The design and implementation of tabletop games will be influenced by the hardware platforms, form factors, sensing technologies, as well as input techniques and devices that are available and chosen. This chapter is divided into three major sections. In the first section, we describe the most recent tabletop hardware technologies that have been used by tabletop researchers and practitioners. In the second section, we discuss a set of experimental tabletop games. The third section presents ten evaluation heuristics for tabletop game design.
KeywordsVideo Game Game Play Heuristic Evaluation Gaming Experience Touch Event
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bakker, S., Vorstenbosch, D., van den Hoven, E., Hollemans, G., Bergman, T.: Tangible interaction in tabletop games: studying iconic and symbolic play pieces. In: ACE’07: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 163–170. ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1255047.1255081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Barakonyi, I., Weilguny, M., Psik, T., Schmalstieg, D.: Monkeybridge: autonomous agents in augmented reality games. In: ACE’05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 172–175. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1178477.1178500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Federoff, M.A.: Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Technical report, Indiana University, Bloomington (2002) Google Scholar
- 6.Frapolli, F., Hirsbrunner, B., Lalanne, D.: Dynamic rules: towards interactive games intelligence. In: IUI Workshop – Tangible Play: Research and Design for Tangible and Tabletop Games. IUI, 2007 Google Scholar
- 7.Gal, E., Goren-Bar, D., Gazit, E., Bauminger, N., Cappelletti, A., Pianesi, F., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Weiss, P.L.: Enhancing social communication through story-telling among high-functioning children with autism. In: INTETAIN, 2005, pp. 320–323 Google Scholar
- 11.Magerkurth, C., Memisoglu, M., Engelke, T., Streitz, N.: Towards the next generation of tabletop gaming experiences. In: GI’04: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, pp. 73–80. Canadian Human–Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2004) Google Scholar
- 15.Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Morris, M.R., Everitt, K.: Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. In: Tabletop, 2006, pp. 89–96 Google Scholar
- 19.Wilson, A.D.: Depth-sensing video cameras for 3d tangible tabletop interaction. In: Tabletop, 2007, pp. 201–204 Google Scholar
- 20.Wilson, A.D., Robbins, D.C.: Playtogether: playing games across multiple interactive tabletops. In: IUI’07 Workshop on Tangible Play, 2006 Google Scholar