Advertisement

Tabletop Games: Platforms, Experimental Games and Design Recommendations

  • Michael Haller
  • Clifton Forlines
  • Christina Koeffel
  • Jakob Leitner
  • Chia Shen
Chapter

Abstract

While the last decade has seen massive improvements in not only the rendering quality, but also the overall performance of console and desktop video games, these improvements have not necessarily led to a greater population of video game players. In addition to continuing these improvements, the video game industry is also constantly searching for new ways to convert non-players into dedicated gamers. Despite the growing popularity of computer-based video games, people still love to play traditional board games, such as Risk, Monopoly, and Trivial Pursuit. Both video and board games have their strengths and weaknesses, and an intriguing conclusion is to merge both worlds. We believe that a tabletop form-factor provides an ideal interface for digital board games. The design and implementation of tabletop games will be influenced by the hardware platforms, form factors, sensing technologies, as well as input techniques and devices that are available and chosen. This chapter is divided into three major sections. In the first section, we describe the most recent tabletop hardware technologies that have been used by tabletop researchers and practitioners. In the second section, we discuss a set of experimental tabletop games. The third section presents ten evaluation heuristics for tabletop game design.

Keywords

Video Game Game Play Heuristic Evaluation Gaming Experience Touch Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bakker, S., Vorstenbosch, D., van den Hoven, E., Hollemans, G., Bergman, T.: Tangible interaction in tabletop games: studying iconic and symbolic play pieces. In: ACE’07: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 163–170. ACM, New York (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1255047.1255081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barakonyi, I., Weilguny, M., Psik, T., Schmalstieg, D.: Monkeybridge: autonomous agents in augmented reality games. In: ACE’05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 172–175. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1178477.1178500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford, S., Magerkurth, C., Ljungstrand, P.: Bridging the physical and digital in pervasive gaming. Commun. ACM 48(3), 54–57 (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1047671.1047704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaine, T., Perkis, T.: The jam-o-drum interactive music system: a study in interaction design. In: DIS’00: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 165–173. ACM, New York (2000). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/347642.347705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federoff, M.A.: Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Technical report, Indiana University, Bloomington (2002) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frapolli, F., Hirsbrunner, B., Lalanne, D.: Dynamic rules: towards interactive games intelligence. In: IUI Workshop – Tangible Play: Research and Design for Tangible and Tabletop Games. IUI, 2007 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gal, E., Goren-Bar, D., Gazit, E., Bauminger, N., Cappelletti, A., Pianesi, F., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Weiss, P.L.: Enhancing social communication through story-telling among high-functioning children with autism. In: INTETAIN, 2005, pp. 320–323 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han, J.Y.: Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In: UIST’05: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 115–118. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095034.1095054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hilton, A., Fua, P.: Modeling people toward vision-based understanding of a person’s shape, appearance and movement. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 81(3), 227–230 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cviu.2001.0907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E.M.I.: Playability heuristics for mobile games. In: MobileHCI’06: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human–Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2006). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1152215.1152218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magerkurth, C., Memisoglu, M., Engelke, T., Streitz, N.: Towards the next generation of tabletop gaming experiences. In: GI’04: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, pp. 73–80. Canadian Human–Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2004) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molich, R., Nielsen, J.: Improving a human–computer dialogue. Commun. ACM 33(3), 338–348 (1990). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/77481.77486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris, M.R., Cassanego, A., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T., Piper, A.M., Huang, A.: Mediating group dynamics through tabletop interface design. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 26(5), 65–73 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: CHI’95: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 377–378. ACM, New York (1995). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/223355.223730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Morris, M.R., Everitt, K.: Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. In: Tabletop, 2006, pp. 89–96 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shen, C., Vernier, F.D., Forlines, C., Ringel, M.: Diamondspin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In: CHI’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 167–174. ACM, New York (2004). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985714 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tse, E., Greenberg, S., Shen, C., Forlines, C.: Multimodal multiplayer tabletop gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5(2), 12 (2007). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1279540.1279552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilson, A.D.: Playanywhere: a compact interactive tabletop projection-vision system. In: UIST’05: Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 83–92. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1095034.1095047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson, A.D.: Depth-sensing video cameras for 3d tangible tabletop interaction. In: Tabletop, 2007, pp. 201–204 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, A.D., Robbins, D.C.: Playtogether: playing games across multiple interactive tabletops. In: IUI’07 Workshop on Tangible Play, 2006 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Haller
    • 1
  • Clifton Forlines
    • 2
  • Christina Koeffel
    • 1
  • Jakob Leitner
    • 1
  • Chia Shen
    • 3
  1. 1.Media Interaction LabHagenbergAustria
  2. 2.Mitsubishi Electric Research LaboratoriesCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations