Imprecision, Inaccuracy, and Frustration: The Tale of Touch Input

Chapter
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

Touch and multi-touch technologies have generated a great deal of excitement. In this chapter we focus on addressing the fundamental limitations associated with the use of touch as the primary input mechanism. We discuss seven problems facing the users of touch-based interfaces and offer a set of possible solutions from the available research so far. In particular, we address issues such as the lack of haptic feedback and hover, as well as problems with precision, occlusion, capture and physical constraints which plague this technology. We then describe two case studies from our own work, which provide complementary solutions to all of the issues discussed in this chapter. By discussing these projects in detail, we aim to expose the reader to the complexity of the issues at hand, to various design considerations, and to the intricate implementation details necessary for implementing such solutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Benko H, Wilson AD, Baudisch P (2006) Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In: Grinter R, Rodden T, Aoki P, Cutrell E, Jeffries R, Olson G (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Montréal, QC, April 22–27, 2006). CHI ’06, ACM Press, New York, pp 1263–1272, doi: http://10.1145/1124772.1124963Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wigdor D, Williams S, Cronin M, White K, Levy R, Mazeev M, Benko H (2009) Ripples: Utilizing per-contact visualizations to improve user interaction with touch displays. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST ’09), ACM Press, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryall K, Forlines C, Shen C, Morris MR, Everitt K (2006) Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems (January 05–07, 2006). TABLETOP, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 89–96, doi: http://10.1109/TABLETOP.2006.12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shen C, Ryall K, Forlines C, Esenther A, Vernier FD, Everitt K, Wu M, Wigdor D, Morris MR, Hancock M, Tse E (2006) Informing the design of direct-touch tabletops. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26(5) (September 2006):36–46, doi: http://10.1109/MCG.2006.109Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu M, Shen C, Ryall K, Forlines C, Balakrishnan R (2006) Gesture registration, relaxation, and reuse for multi-point direct-touch surfaces. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems (January 05–07, 2006). TABLETOP, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 185–192, doi: http://10.1109/TABLETOP.2006.19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen C, Vernier FD, Forlines C, Ringel M (2004) DiamondSpin: An extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Vienna, Austria, April 24–29, 2004). CHI ’04, ACM Press, New York, pp 167–174, doi: http://10.1145/985692.985714Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Touchlib, A multi-touch development kit, http://nuigroup.com/touchlib/, Accessed 23.09.2009
  8. 8.
    Potter RL, Weldon LJ, Shneiderman B (1988) Improving the accuracy of touch screens: An experimental evaluation of three strategies. In: O’Hare JJ (ed) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Washington, DC, May 15–19, 1988). CHI ’88, ACM Press, New York, pp 27–32, doi: http://10.1145/57167.57171Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poupyrev I, Maruyama S, Rekimoto J (2002) Ambient touch: Designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Paris, France, October 27–30, 2002). UIST ’02, ACM Press, New York, pp 51–60, doi: http://10.1145/571985.571993Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee JC, Dietz PH, Leigh D, Yerazunis WS, Hudson SE (2004) Haptic pen: A tactile feedback stylus for touch screens. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Santa Fe, NM, October 24–27, 2004). UIST ’04, ACM Press, New York, pp 291–294, doi: http://10.1145/1029632.1029682Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hancock MS, Shen C, Forlines C, Ryall K (2005) Exploring non-speech auditory feedback at an interactive multi-user tabletop. In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2005 (Victoria, BC, May 09–11, 2005). GI, vol 112, Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, pp 41–50Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiss M, Wagner J, Jansen Y, Jennings R, Khoshabeh R, Hollan JD, Borchers J (2009) SLAP widgets: Bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (Boston, MA, April 04–09, 2009). CHI ’09, ACM Press, New York, pp. 481–490, doi: http://10.1145/1518701.1518779Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrison C, Hudson SE (2009) Providing dynamically changeable physical buttons on a visual display. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (Boston, MA, April 04–09, 2009). CHI ’09, ACM Press, New York, pp 299–308, doi: http://10.1145/1518701.1518749Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buxton W (1990) A three-state model of graphical input. In: Diaper D, Gilmore DJ, Cockton G, Shackel B (eds) Proceedings of the IFIP Tc13 third interational conference on human-computer interaction (August 27–31, 1990). North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp 449–456Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vogel D, Baudisch P (2007) Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (San Jose, CA, April 28–May 03, 2007). CHI ’07, ACM Press, New York, pp 657–666, doi: http://10.1145/1240624.1240727Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forlines C, Shen C, Buxton B (2005) Glimpse: A novel input model for multi-level devices. In: CHI ’05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (Portland, OR, April 02–07, 2005). CHI ’05, ACM Press, New York, pp 1375–1378, doi: http://10.1145/1056808.1056920Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Han JY (2005) Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Seattle, WA, October 23–26, 2005). UIST ’05. ACM Press, New York, pp. 115–118, doi: http://10.1145/1095034.1095054Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siek KA, Rogers Y, Connelly KH (2005) Fat finger worries: How older and younger users physically interact with PDAs. In: Proceedings of INTERACT ’05, pp 267–280Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schilit, B, Adams, N, Want, R (1994) Context-aware computing applications. In: Proceedings of the 1994 first workshop on mobile computing systems and applications – Volume 00 (December 08–09, 1994). WMCSA, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 85–90, doi: http://10.1109/WMCSA.1994.16Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albinsson P, Zhai S (2003) High precision touch screen interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April 05–10, 2003). CHI ’03, ACM Press, New York, pp 105–112, doi: http://10.1145/642611.642631Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wigdor D, Forlines C, Baudisch P, Barnwell J, Shen C (2007) Lucid touch: A see-through mobile device. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Newport, Rhode Island, October 07–10, 2007). UIST ’07, ACM Press, New York, pp 269–278, doi: http://10.1145/1294211.1294259Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hiraoka S, Miyamoto I, Tomimatsu K (2003) Behind touch, a text input method for mobile phones by the back and tactile sense interface. Information Processing Society of Japan, Interaction 2003, pp 131–138Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wigdor D, Leigh D, Forlines C, Shipman S, Barnwell J, Balakrishnan R, Shen C (2006) Under the table interaction. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Montreux, Switzerland, October 15–18, 2006). UIST ’06, ACM Press, New York, pp 259–268, doi: http://10.1145/1166253.1166294Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baudisch P, Chu G (2009) Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (Boston, MA, April 04–09, 2009). CHI ’09, ACM Press, New York, pp 1923–1932, doi: http://10.1145/1518701.1518995Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Esenther A, Ryall K (2006) Fluid DTMouse: Better mouse support for touch-based interactions. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (Venezia, Italy, May 23–26, 2006). AVI ’06, ACM Press, New York, pp 112–115, doi: http://10.1145/1133265.1133289Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moscovich T, Hughes JF (2006) Multi-finger cursor techniques. In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2006 (Quebec, June 07–09, 2006). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol 137, Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, ON, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vogel D, Cudmore M, Casiez G, Balakrishnan R, Keliher L (2009) Hand occlusion with tablet-sized direct pen input. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (Boston, MA, April 04–09, 2009). CHI ’09, ACM Press, New York, pp 557–566, doi: http://10.1145/1518701.1518787Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cao X, Wilson AD, Balakrishnan R, Hinckley K, Hudson SE (2008) ShapeTouch: Leveraging contact shape on interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems (Tabletop ’08), pp 129–136Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wigdor D, Perm G, Ryall K, Esenther A, Shen C (2007) Living with a tabletop: Analysis and observations of long term office use of a multi-touch table. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on horizontal interactive human-computer systems (Tabletop ’07), pp 60–67Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ullmer B, Ishii, H (1997) The metaDESK: Models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Banff, AB, October 14–17, 1997). UIST ’97, ACM Press, New York, pp 223–232, doi: http://10.1145/263407.263551Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nacenta MA, Baudisch P, Benko H, Wilson A (2009) Separability of spatial manipulations in multi-touch interfaces. In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2009 (Kelowna, BC, May 25–27, 2009). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol 324, Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, ON, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Forlines C, Vogel D, Balakrishnan R (2006) HybridPointing: Fluid switching between absolute and relative pointing with a direct input device. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Montreux, Switzerland, October 15–18, 2006). UIST ’06, ACM Press, New York, pp 211–220, doi: http://10.1145/1166253.1166286Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feeney R (2002) Specific anthropometric and strength data for people with dexterity disability, consumer and competition policy directorate, Department of Trade and Industry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Benko H (2007) User interaction in hybrid multi-display environments. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, May 2007Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baudisch P, Tan D, Collomb M, Robbins D, Hinckley K, Agrawala M, Zhao S, Ramos G (2006) Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (Montreux, Switzerland, October 15–18, 2006). UIST ’06, ACM Press, New York, pp 169–178, doi: http://10.1145/1166253.1166280Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Microsoft Research, One Microsoft WayRedmondUSA

Personalised recommendations