Advertisement

ECSCW 2009 pp 63-83 | Cite as

The eDiary: Bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology

  • Rikke Aarhus
  • Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard
  • Thomas Riisgaard Hansen

Abstract

The main contribution of the paper is to present challenges relating to the use of new healthcare technology, the eDiary, which seeks to create a better integration between home and hospital. To minimise risks of malformations and other complications, pregnant women with diabetes are enrolled in an extensive treatment regime, which requires frequent visits to an outpatient clinic as well as a high degree of self-care. The eDiary is designed to assist the women in this work, primarily by allowing the women to register their glucose values, record video consultations, and support video-tele-consultations. This paper reports on a pilot study during which pregnant women with diabetes and their healthcare providers make use of the eDiary. The pilot study indicates that such healthcare technology not only allows the women to achieve a better integration of the management of their diabetes into their everyday life, but may also challenge existing power relations between patients and healthcare providers.

Keywords

Blood Glucose Pregnant Woman Mobile Phone Outpatient Clinic Everyday Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonzo, A. (1979): ‘Everyday Illness Behavior: A Situational Approach to Health Status Deviations’. Social Science and Medicine, 13A, 4, June 1979, p. 397–404Google Scholar
  2. Ballegaard, S., Aa., Aarhus, R. (forthcoming 2009): ‘Teknologiers mellemkomst i ambulant behandling og egenomsorg’ [The intervention of technologies in ambulant treatment and self-care: the case of pregnant women with diabetes], in Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund [Journal for research in sickness and society].Google Scholar
  3. Ballegaard, S. Aa., Hansen, T. R., and Kyng, M. (2008): Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life. In Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ′08. ACM, New York, NY, 1807–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardram, J., Bossen, C., and Thomsen, A. (2005): Designing for transformations in collaboration: a study of the deployment of homecare technology. Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, pages 294–303, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Clausen, T.D., Mathiesen, E., Ekbom, P., Hellmuth, E., Mandrup-Poulsen, T., Damm, P. (2005): ‘Poor pregnancy outcome in women with type 2 diabetes’, Diabetes Care 28(2), Feb. 2005, pp. 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danholt, P. (2008): Interacting Bodies: Posthuman Enactments of the Problem of Diabetes, Roskilde Universitetscenter, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  7. Diabetes Logbook: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.nesfield.co.uk/diabeteslogbookx/Diabetes pilot: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.diabetespilot.com
  8. Dinesen, B. (2007): Implementation of telehomecare technology: impact on chronically ill patients, healthcare professionals and the healthcare system, International Journal of Integrated Care. 2007; vol. 7.Google Scholar
  9. Dourish, P. (2004): What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grudin, J. (1989): ‘Why groupware applications fail: problems in design and evaluation’, Office: Technology and People 4 (3), pp. 245–264.Google Scholar
  11. Grøn L., Meinert, L., Mattingly, C. (2008): ‘Kronisk hjemmearbejde. Sociale håb, dilemmaer og konflikter i et hjemmearbejdsnarrativ i Uganda, Danmark og USA’ [Chronic homework. Social hope, dilemmas and conflicts in a homework narrative in Uganda, Denmark and USA], in Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund 1Journal for research in sickness and society], Nr. 9, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
  12. Heath, C, Luff, P. (1996): Documents and Professional Practice: “bad” organisational reasons for “good” clinical records. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1996, p. 354–363Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, D.M., Damm, P., Moelsted-Pedersen, L., Ovesen, P., Westergaard, J.G., Moeller, M., (2004): ‘Outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a nationwide, population-based study’. Diabetes Care, 27(12), Dec 2004, pp. 2819–2823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lauenborg, J., Mathiesen, E., Ovesen, P., Westergaard, J.G., Ekbom, P., Molsted-Pedersen, L., (2003): ‘Audit on stillbirths in women with pregestational type 1 diabetes’. Diabetes Care, 26(5), May 2003, pp.1385–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E. D., and Kaufman, D. R. (2006): ‘Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI’06, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E., Davidson, P., and Greenblatt, D. (2008): ‘MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management’, in Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ′08. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendosa: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.mendosa.com/software.htm
  18. Ministry of the Interiour and Health (2003) Handlingsplan for diabetes [Strategic plan on diabetes]. (Accessed Oct. 31st 2008) www.sum.dk/publikationer/diabetesbeh/handlingsplan.pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. MyNetDiary: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.mynetdiary.com/
  20. OneTouch: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.onetouchdiabetes.com/ultrasmart/index.html
  21. Robinson, C. A. (1993) Managing Life with a Chronic Condition: The story of Normalization. Qulitative Health Research, vol. 3, no. 1, Feb. 1993, 6–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SiDiary: (Accessed on March 1st 2009) http://www.sidiary.org/
  23. Sokoler, T., Löwgren, J., Eriksen, M. A., Linde, P., and Olofsson, S. (2007): Explicit interaction for surgical rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Tangible and Embedded interaction. TEI ′07. ACM, New York, NY, 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, B. K., Frost, J., Albayrak, M., and Sudhakar, R. (2007): ‘Integrating glucometers and digital photography as experience capture tools to enhance patient understanding and communication of diabetes self-management practices’, in Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 11, 4 (Apr. 2007), pp. 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Star, S., L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989): ‘Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, in Social Studies of Science, 19, pp. 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., Wiener, C. (1997): Social organization of medical work. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Verhoeven, F., Gemert van, L., Dijkstra, K., Nijland, N., Seydel, E., and Steehouder, M. (2007): The Contribution of Teleconsultation and Videoconferencing to Diabetes Care: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9 (5). e37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rikke Aarhus
    • 1
  • Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard
    • 2
  • Thomas Riisgaard Hansen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCentre for Pervasive HealthcareAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Information StudiesCentre for Pervasive HealthcareAarhusDenmak
  3. 3.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations