Is There a Relationship Between VC Firm Business Process Flow Management and Investment Decisions?

  • Jeffrey S. Petty
  • Gerald Reiner
Conference paper

Abstract

This study on the management of business process flows of venture capital (VC) firms explores the relationship between the utilization rate of the human resources within the VC firm and deal (project) rejection rate under consideration of contextual factors. We employ an exploratory research design (a historical case analysis) as well as quantitativemodel oriented research based on empirical data in order to understand what is really going on in terms of VC firm processes with regard to their system dynamics. We utilize a longitudinal data set comprising 11 years of archival data covering 3,340 investment decisions collected from a European-based VC firm. The results indicate that, over time, there are considerable dynamics in the VC decision making process. Specifically, the investment decisions of venture capitalists are influenced by firm-specific factors related to the human capital resources of the firm, namely management capacity. Implications of these results for research and practice, in venture capital as well as other service industries, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barney J (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17(1):99 – 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney JB (1986) Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Academy of Management Review 11(3):656 – 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand J, Fransoo J (2002) Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22(2):241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cyert R, March J (1963) A behavioral theory of the firmGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis J, Eisenhardt K, Bingham C (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. The Academy of Management Review (AMR) 32(2):480–499Google Scholar
  6. Dixon R (1991) Venture Capitalists and the Appraisal of Investments. Omega 19(5):333 – 344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32(3):543 – 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic Decision Making. Strategic Management Journal 13(Special Issue):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2008) Venture Capitalists’ Evaluations of Start-Up Teams: Trade-Offs, Knock-Out Criteria, and the Impact of VC Experience. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 32(3):459 – 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fried VH, Hisrich RD (1988) Venture Capital Research: Past, Present and Future. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 13(1):15 – 28Google Scholar
  11. Fried VH, Hisrich RD (1994) Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making. FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association 23(3):28 – 37Google Scholar
  12. Gifford S (1997) Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing 12(6):459 – 482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  14. Gorman M, Sahlman WA (1989) What do venture capitalists do? Journal of Business Venturing 4(4):231 – 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta AK, Sapienza HJ (1992) Determinants of venture capital firms’ preferences regarding the industry diversity and geographic scope of their investments. Journal of Business Venturing 7(5):347 – 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall J, Hofer CW (1993) Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing 8(1):25 – 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hitt M, Tyler B (1991) Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 12(5):327–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (1996) Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management. Irvin Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Jääskeläinen M, Maula M, Sepp T (2006) Allocation of Attention to Portfolio Companies and the Performance of Venture Capital Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 30(2):185 – 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jammernegg W, Reiner G (2007) Performance improvement of supply chain processes by coordinated inventory and capacity management. International Journal of Production Economics 108(1-2):183 – 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macmillan IC, Siegel R, Narasimha PNS (1985) Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing 1(1):119 – 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahoney JT, Pandian JR (1992) The Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 13(5):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matusik S, George J, Heeley M (2008) alues and judgment under uncertainty: Evidence from venture capitalist assessments of founders. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(2):95–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitroff II, Betz F, Pondy LR, Sagasti F (1974) On managing science in the systems age: Two schemas for the study of science as a whole systems phenomenon. Interfaces 4(3):46 – 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naylor J, Naim M, Berry D (1999) Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 62(1-2):107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts C (1997) Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  27. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (1999) Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital 1(3):197 – 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A, Baron RA (2003) VCs’ decision processes: Evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better. Journal of Business Venturing 18(3):381 – 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepherd DA, Armstrong MJ, Lévesque M (2005) Allocation of attention within venture capital firms. European Journal of Operational Research 163(2):545 – 564MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications IncGoogle Scholar
  31. Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV (1984) A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity. Management Science 30(9):1051–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yin R (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  33. Zacharakis A, Shepherd DA (2005) A non-additive decision-aid for venture capitalists’ investment decisions. European Journal of Operational Research 162(3):673 – 689MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey S. Petty
    • 1
  • Gerald Reiner
    • 2
  1. 1.Lancer Callon Ltd.LondonUK
  2. 2.Institut de l’entrepriseUniversité de NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations