Advertisement

Collaborative Virtual Environments and Immersion in Distributed Engineering Contexts

  • Marc Pallot
  • Ulf Bergmann

Abstract

Distributed Manufacturing is mostly associated with computing features and sophisticated software logics rather than with working environments concurrently used in distant locations. Nowadays, the global success of Web2.0 and, more specifically, social networking web applications are quite obvious. In fact, information and communication technology (ICT) users are creating web content, applications and online role-playing games with their own activities and related data in using web applications such as eBay®, Facebook, Second Life virtual environment, and World of Warcraft. In manufacturing, interests are quite different and therefore other solutions should contribute to overcome collaborative distance factors that are impeding an effective and efficient distributed collaboration. Using important existing options in this field, this chapter presents an overview on key developments and web applications in the area of distributed computing systems to support effective and efficient collaborative work carried out by different groups of people in different organisational units or companies with a strong focus on engineering communication.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Augmented Reality Social Awareness Video Conferencing Social Intelligence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Lüder, A. and K. Lorentz. 2005. IAONA Handbook Industrial Ethernet. Magdeburg: Industrial Automation Open Networking Alliance e.V. ISBN 3-00-016934-2.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zaremba, A.J. 2003. Organizational Communication: Foundations for Business & Management. 1st edn. Mason: Thomson/South-Western.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Eisenberg, A. 1982. Effective Technical Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Borowick, J.N. 1996. Technical Communication and Its Application. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Pallot, M., S. Richir and H. Samier. 2008. Shared Workspace and Group Blogging Experimentation through a Living Lab approach. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2008 "A new wave of innovation in Collaborative Networks", 23-25 June, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wilson, J., M. Boyer O'Leary, A. Metiu and Q. Jett. 2005. Subjective distance in Teams. Working papers series, INSEAD.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    O’Leary, M.B. and J.N. Cummings. 2002. The spatial, temporal and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in work teams. Working paper, 148, MIT E-Business Center, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Pallot, M. 2007. Collaborative distance, factors that are affecting collaboration effectiveness and efficiency. ECOSPACE project deliverable. A literature review and a reference framework for collaborative research about distance and proximity factors affecting collaboration.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bergmann, U. 2008. Kommunikation als Optimierungskriterium: ein Beitrag zur Systematisierung der Layoutplanung von Produktionssystemen. Thesis (PhD). Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Antonsson, E.K. and K.H. Grote. 2007. Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wigand, R., A. Picot and R. Reichwald. 2004. Information, Organization and Management: Expanding Markets and Corporate Boundaries. Chichester: Wiley (reprint).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ferran, C. and S. Watts. 2008. Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model. Management Science, 54 (9): 1565-1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Garrett, R.K. and J.N. Danziger. 2007. IM=Interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/garrett.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Glover, D., D. Miller, D. Averis and V. Door. 2005. The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14 (2): 155-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Pallot, M., W. Prinz and H. Schaffers. 2005. Future Workplaces, towards the "Collaborative Web". In: Pallot, M. and K.S. Pawar, eds., Proceedings of the AMI@Work Forum 2005, Munic, pp 3-16.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forumGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Pallot, M., R. Ruland, S. Traykov and K. Kristensen. 2006. Integrating shared workspace, wiki and blog technologies to support interpersonal knowledge connection. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2006 “Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks”, Milan.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    http://www.blogger.com/featuresGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mailGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kühnle, H., U. Hess, D. Scheffter and T. Harada. 2005. Collaborative virtual planning and design of production systems. In: Ma, Q., R.J. Jiao, M.M. Tseng, Mitchell M., M.J. Zuo, eds., Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management in the Global Economy (11th International Conference Northeastern University) 23-25 April, Shenyang. Proceedings: Beijing: China Machine Press: 691-695.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Scheffter, D., U. Bergmann and G. Wagenhaus. 2006. Virtual Commissioning. In: 6th International Conference on Production Engineering "Knowledge-Vision-Framework, 7-8 December, Wroclaw.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Coelho, E.M. and B. MacIntyre. 2005. Augmenting real environments. In: The Third Young Inverstigator's Forum in Virtual Reality (YVR 2005), 24-25 February, Pohang.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Antoniac, P., M. Pallot and P. Pulli. 2006. Virtual and augmented reality supporting group consciousness within collaborative working environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2006 Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, Milan.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Boronowsky, M., O. Herzog, M. Lawo and P. Knackfuss. 2006. Wearable computing – a new approach in concurrent enterprising. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2006 Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, Milan.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    MacIntyre, B., J.D. Bolter and M. Gandy. 2004. Presence and the aura of meaningful places. In: 7th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 13-15 October, Valencia.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Goleman, D. 2006. Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books : Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Elliott M. 2006. Stigmergic collaboration: the evolution of group work. M/C Journal 9.2. 21 Mar. 2009 <http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0605/03-elliott.php>.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Pallot
    • 1
  • Ulf Bergmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Concurrent EnterpriseNottingham University Business SchoolNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Faculty for Mechanical Engineering, Institute for Ergonomics, Manufacturing Systems, and AutomationOtto-von-Guericke University of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations