Evaluation of Transformer Technical Characteristics

Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the evaluation of transformer technical characteristics. Decision trees and artificial neural networks are used to solve the noload loss classification problem. Artificial neural networks are used to solve the no-load loss prediction problem. Impedance voltage evaluation is implemented using a particular finite element model with detailed representation of winding geometry.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amoiralis EI, Tsili MA, Georgilakis PS (2008) The state of the art in engineering methods for transformer design and optimization: a survey. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials 10(5):1149–1158Google Scholar
  2. Andersen OW (1973) Transformer leakage flux program based on the finite element method. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 92(2):682–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annakkage UD, McLaren PG, Dircks E, Jayasinghe RP, Parker AD (2000) A current transformer model based on the Jiles-Atherton theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 15:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basak A, Bonyar AA (1992) Effects of transformer core assembly on building factors. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 112:406–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basak A, Yu CH, Lloyd G (1994) Core loss computation of a 1000 kVA distribution transformer. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 133:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertotti G (1988) General properties of power losses in soft ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 24:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Digby SH, Sim HJ (2002) Transformer design for dual-voltage applications. Proc IEEE Rural Electric Power ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  8. Djurovic M, Carpenter CJ (1975) 3-dimensional computation of transformer leakage fields and associated losses. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 11(5):1535–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doulamis ND, Doulamis AD, Georgilakis PS, Kollias SD, Hatziargyriou ND (2002) A synergetic neural network-genetic scheme for optimal transformer construction. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 9:37–56Google Scholar
  10. Dymkov A (1975) Transformer design. Mir Publishers, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebert JA (1995) Criteria for reliable dual voltage power transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 10(2):845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elleuch M, Poloujadoff M (1996) A contribution to the modeling of three phase transformers using reluctances. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 32:3335–3343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elleuch M, Poloujadoff M (2003) Analytical model of iron losses in power transformers. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 39(2):973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enokizono M, Soda N (1997) Finite element analysis of transformer model core with measured reluctivity tensor. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 33(5):4110–4112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Enokizono M, Soda N (1998) Direct magnetic loss analysis by FEM considering vector magnetic properties. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 34(5):3008–3011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enokizono M, Soda N (1999) Core loss analysis of transformer by improved FEM. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 196-197:910–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enokizono M, Yuki K, Kawano S (1995) An improved magnetic field analysis in oriented steel sheet by finite element method considering tensor reluctivity. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 31(3):1797–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escarela-Perez R, Kulkarni SV, Kodela NK, Olivares-Galvan JC (2007) Asymmetry during loadloss measurement of three-phase three-limb transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 22(3):1566–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fecich D, Balmer L (1985) Process factors of transformer cores made from 0.18 mm, 0.23 mm, and 0.28 mm thick grain oriented steel. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 21(5):1915–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiorello F, Novikov M (1990) An improved approach to power loss in magnetic laminations under nonsinusoidal induction waveform. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 26:2904–2910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Georgilakis PS (2000) Contribution of artificial intelligence techniques in the reduction of distribution transformer iron losses. PhD dissertation. National Technical University of Athens, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  22. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND (1999) Machine learning applications in the transformer manufacturing industry. Proc Advanced Course on Artificial Intelligence 57–65Google Scholar
  23. Georgilakis P, Hatziargyriou N (2002) On the application of artificial intelligence techniques to the quality improvement of industrial processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2308:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Georgilakis PS, Bakopoulos JA, Hatziargyriou ND (1997) A decision tree method for prediction of distribution transformer iron losses. Proc Universities Power Engineering Conference 1:257–260Google Scholar
  25. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Souflaris AT (1998a) Artificial intelligence approaches to distribution transformer core quality improvement. Proc International Conference on Electrical Machines 1:541–546Google Scholar
  26. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Doulamis ND, Doulamis AD, Kollias SD (1998b) Prediction of iron losses of wound core distribution transformers based on artificial neural networks. Neurocomputing 23:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Paparigas D (1999a) AI helps reduce transformer iron losses. IEEE Computer Applications in Power 12(4):41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Doulamis ND, Doulamis AD, Bakopoulos JA (1999b) An efficient PC-based environment for the improvement of magnetic cores industrial process. In: Tzafestas SG (ed.) Advances in manufacturing: decision, control, and information technology. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Georgilakis P, Hatziargyriou N, Paparigas D, Bakopoulos J, Elefsiniotis S (1999c) Automatic learning techniques for on-line control and optimization of transformer core manufacturing process. Proc IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting 1:311–322Google Scholar
  30. Georgilakis P, Hatziargyriou N, Paparigas D, Bakopoulos J (1999d) On-line combined use of neural networks and genetic algorithms to the solution of transformer iron loss reduction problem. Proc IEEE PowerTechGoogle Scholar
  31. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND, Doulamis AD, Doulamis ND, Kollias SD (1999e) A neural network framework for predicting transformer core losses. Proc IEEE International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications 1:301–308Google Scholar
  32. Georgilakis PS, Doulamis ND, Doulamis AD, Hatziargyriou ND, Kollias SD (2001a) A novel iron loss reduction technique for distribution transformers based on a genetic algorithmneural network approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 31(1):16–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Georgilakis P, Hatziargyriou N, Paparigas D, Elefsiniotis S (2001b) Effective use of magnetic materials in transformer manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 108:209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Girgis RS, teNyenhuis EG, Gramm K, Wrethag JE (1998) Experimental investigations on effect of core production attributes on transformer core loss performance. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 13(2):526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Godec Z (1977) Influence of slitting on core losses and magnetization curve of grain-oriented electrical steels. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 13(4):1053–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hatziargyriou ND, Prousalidis JM, Papadias BC (1993) A generalized transformer model based on the analysis of its magnetic circuit. IEE Proceedings, Part C 140(4):269–278Google Scholar
  37. Hatziargyriou N, Georgilakis P, Spiliopoulos D, Bakopoulos J (1998a) Quality improvement of individual cores of distribution transformers using decision trees. International Journal of Engineering Intelligent Systems for Electrical Engineering and Communications 6(3):141–146Google Scholar
  38. Hatziargyriou ND, Georgilakis PS, Paparigas DG, Bakopoulos JA (1998b) Prediction of distribution transformer no-load losses using the learning vector quantization neural network. Proc IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference 2:1180–1184Google Scholar
  39. Ilo A, Weiser B, Booth T, Pfutzner H (1996) Influence of geometric parameters on the magnetic properties of model transformer cores. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 160:38–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Im CH, Kim HK, Lee CH, Jung HK (2001) Analysis of the three-phase transformer considering the nonlinear and anisotropic properties using the transmission line modeling method and FEM. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 37(5):3490–3493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiles DC, Atherton DL (1986) Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 61:48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaimori H, Kameari A, Fujiwara K (2007) FEM computation of magnetic field and iron loss in laminated iron core using homogenization method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 43(4):1405–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalokiris GK, Kladas AG, Hatzilau IK, Cofinas S, Gyparis IK (2007) Advances in magnetic materials and their impact on electric machine design. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 181(1-3):148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kanada T, Enokizono M, Kawamura K, Sievert JD (1996) Distributions on localized iron loss of three-phase amorphous transformer model core by using two-dimensional magnetic tensor. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 32(5):4797–4799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kefalas TD, Georgilakis PS, Kladas AG, Souflaris AT, Paparigas, DG (2008) Multiple grade lamination wound core: a novel technique for transformer iron loss minimization using simulated annealing with restarts and an anisotropy model. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 44(6):1082–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kladas A, Tegopoulos J (1992) A new scalar potential formulation for 3D magnetostatics necessitating no source field calculation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 28:1103–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kladas AG, Papadopoulos MP, Tegopoulos JA (1994) Leakage flux and force calculation on power transformer windings under short-circuit: 2D and 3D models based on the theory of images and the finite element method compared to measurements. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 30(5):3487–3490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kobayashi H (1981) Modeling and analysis. Addison-Welsey, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  49. Kulkarni SV, Khaparde SA (2004) Transformer engineering: design and practice. Marcel- Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Kulkarni SV, Olivares JC, Escarela-Perez R, Lakhiani VK, Turowski J (2004) Evaluation of eddy current losses in the cover plates of distribution transformers. IEE Proc Science, Measurement and Technology 151(5):313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ling PCY, Moses AJ, McQuade F, Grimmond W, Fox D (1992) Investigation of magnetic degradation of wound cores due to adhesive bonding. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 112:77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Logothetis N (1992) Managing for total quality. Prentice-Hall International, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Lu J, Yuan J, Chen L, Sheng J, Ma X (1998) Calculation of short-circuit reactance of transformers by a line integral based on surface magnetic charges. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 34(5):3483–3486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mechler GF, Girgis RS (1998) Calculation of spatial loss distribution in stacked power and distribution transformer cores. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 13(2):532–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mechler GF, Girgis RS (2000) Magnetic flux distributions in transformer core joints. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 15(1):198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miti GK, Moses AJ, Derebasi N, Fox D (2003) A neural network-based tool for magnetic performance prediction of toroidal cores. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 254- 255:262–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mittle VN, Mittal A (1996) Design of electrical machines, 4th edn. Standard Publishers Distributors, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  58. Mork BA (1999) Five-legged wound-core transformer model: derivation, parameters, implementation, and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 14:1519–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moses AJ (1984) Factors affecting localized flux and iron loss distribution in laminated cores. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 41:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moses AJ (1992) Development of alternative magnetic core materials and incentives for their use. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 112:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moses AJ (1998) Comparison of transformer loss prediction from computed and measured flux density distribution. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 34(4):1168–1170CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. Moses AJ (2003) Prediction of core losses of three phase transformers from estimation of the components contributing to the building factor. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 254-255:615–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nakata T, Takahashi N, Kawase Y, Nakano M (1984) Influence of lamination orientation and stacking on magnetic characteristics of grain-oriented silicon steel laminations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 20:1774–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nussbaum C, Booth T, Ilo A, Pfutzner H (1996) A neural network for the prediction of performance parameters of transformer cores. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 160:81– 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nussbaum C, Pfutzner H, Booth Th, Baumgartinger N, Ilo A, Clabian M (2000) Neural networks for the prediction of magnetic transformer core characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36(1):313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olivares JC, Cañedo J, Moreno P, Driesen J, Escarela R, Palanivasagam S (2002) Experimental study to reduce the distribution-transformers stray losses using electromagnetic shields. Electric Power Systems Research 63(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Olivares JC, Yilu L, Canedo JM, Escarela-Perez R, Driesen J, Moreno P (2003a) Reducing losses in distribution transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 18(3):821–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Olivares JC, Kulkarni SV, Canedo J, Escarela R, Driesen J, Moreno P (2003b) Impact of the joint design parameters on transformer losses. International Journal of Power & Energy Systems 23(3):151–157Google Scholar
  69. Olivares JC, Escarela-Perez R, Kulkarni SV, de Leon F, Melgoza-Vasquez E, Hernandez-Anaya O (2004a) Improved insert geometry for reducing tank-wall losses in pad-mounted transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 19(3):1120–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Olivares JC, Escarela-Perez R, Kulkarni SV, de León F, Venegas-Vega MA (2004b) 2D finiteelement determination of tank wall losses in pad-mounted transformers. Electric Power Systems Research 71(2):179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Olivares-Galván JC, Georgilakis PS, Ocon-Valdez R (2009) A review of transformer losses. Electric Power Components and Systems, accepted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  72. Proussalidis J, Hatziargyriou N, Kladas A (2001) Iron lamination efficient representation in power transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 108:217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raitsios P (2001) Leakage field of a transformer under conventional and superconducting condition. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 102:246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rajakovic N, Semlyen A (1989a) Harmonic domain analysis of field variables related to eddy current and hysteresis losses in saturated laminations. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 4(2):1111–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rajakovic N, Semlyen A (1989b) Investigation of the inrush phenomenon: a quasi-stationary approach in the harmonic domain. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 4(4):2114–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rovolis P, Kladas A, Tegopoulos J (2007) Laminated iron core losses evaluation and measurements. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 181(1-3):182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sato T, Sakaki Y (1990) Physical meaning of equivalent loss resistance of magnetic cores. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 26:2894–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Semlyen A, Rajakovic N (1989) Harmonic domain modeling of laminated iron core. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 4(1):382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Soda N, Enokizono M (2000) Improvement of T-joint part constructions in three-phase transformer cores by using direct loss analysis with E&S model. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36(4):1285–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taguchi G, Konishi S (1987) Taguchi methods: orthogonal arrays and linear graphs; tools for quality engineering. ASI, Dearborn, MIGoogle Scholar
  81. Tatis KB, Kladas AG, Tegopoulos JA (2004) Harmonic iron loss determination in laminated iron cores by using a particular 3-D finite-element model. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 40(2):860–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. teNyenhuis EG, Girgis RS (2006) Measured variability of performance parameters of power and distribution transformers. Proc IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, 523–528Google Scholar
  83. teNyenhuis EG, Mechler GF, Girgis RS (2000) Flux distribution and core loss calculation for single phase and five limb three phase transformer core designs. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 15(1):204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. teNyenhuis EG, Girgis RS, Mechler GF (2001) Other factors contributing to the core loss performance of power and distribution transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 16(4):648–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tomczuk B (1988) Analysis of 3D magnetic fields in high leakage reactance transformers. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 30:94–97Google Scholar
  86. Tsili MA (2005) Development of mixed finite element – boundary element numerical techniques for the design of power transformers. PhD dissertation. National Technical University of Athens, Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  87. Tsili MA, Kladas AG, Georgilakis PS, Souflaris AT, Pitsilis CP, Bakopoulos JA, Paparigas DG (2004) Hybrid numerical techniques for power transformer modeling: a comparative analysis validated by measurements. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 40(2):842–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tsili M, Kladas A, Georgilakis P, Souflaris A, Paparigas D (2005) Numerical techniques for design and modeling of distribution transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 161(1-2):320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tsili MA, Kladas AG, Georgilakis PS, Souflaris AT, Paparigas DG (2006) Advanced design methodology for single and dual voltage wound core power transformers based on a particular finite element model. Electric Power Systems Research 76:729–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsili MA, Kladas AG, Georgilakis PS (2008) Computer aided analysis and design of power transformers. Computers in Industry 59(4):338–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Turowski J, Turowski M, Kopec M (1990) Method of three-dimensional network solution of leakage field of three-phase transformers. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 26(5):2911–2919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Valkovic Z (1982) Influence of transformer core design on power losses. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 18:801–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Valkovic Z (1984) Additional losses in three-phase transformer cores. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 41:424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Valkovic Z, Rezic A (1992) Improvement of transformer core magnetic properties using the step-lap design. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 112:413–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Xiang C, Jinsha Y, Guoquiang Z, Yuanlu Z, Qifan H (1997) Analysis of leakage magnetic problems in shell-form power transformer. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 33(2):2049–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zakrzewski K, Kukaniszyn M (1992) Three-dimensional model of one- and three-phase transformer for leakage field calculation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 28(2):1344–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zakrzewski K, Tomczuk B (1996) Magnetic field analysis and leakage inductance calculation in current transformer by means of 3D integral method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 32(3):1637–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Personalised recommendations