Advertisement

Designing a Successful Bidding Strategy Using Fuzzy Sets and Agent Attitudes

  • Jun MaEmail author
  • Madhu Lata Goyal
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP)

Abstract

To be successful in a multi-attribute auction, agents must be capable of adapting to continuously changing bidding price. This chapter presents a novel fuzzy attitude-based bidding strategy (FA-Bid), which employs dual assessment technique, i.e., assessment of multiple attributes of the goods as well as assessment of agents’ attitude (eagerness) to procure an item in automated auction. The assessment of attributes adapts the fuzzy sets technique to handle uncertainty of the bidding process as well use heuristic rules to determine the attitude of bidding agents in simulated auctions to procure goods. The overall assessment is used to determine a price range based on current bid, which finally selects the best one as the new bid.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthony, P., N.R.Jennings: Evolving bidding strategies for multiple auctions. In: Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 187–192. Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Byde, A., Priest, C., N.R.Jennings: Decision procedures for multiple auctions. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 613–620. Bologana, Italy (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence 25(4) (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Combining linguistic information in a distributed intelligent agent model for information gathering on the internet. In: P. Wang (ed.) Computing with words, pp. 251–276. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L., Vila, M.A.: Aggregation of linguistic information based on a symbolic approach. In: L. Zadeh, J. Kacpryzk (eds.) Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems I. Foundations, pp. 428–440. Physica–Verlag (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3–4), 159–185 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA (1975)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenwald, A., Stone, P.: Autonomous bidding agents in the trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing pp. 52–60 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    He, M., Leung, H.F., Jennings, N.R.: A fuzzy-logic based bidding strategy for autonomous agents in continuous double auctions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and data Engineering 15(6), 1345–1363 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F.: Multiperson decision–making based on multiplicative preference relations. European J. Operational Research 129, 372–385 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldrige, M.: Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kowalcyzk, R.: On negotiation as a distributed fuzzy constraint satisfaction problem. In: Proceedings DEXA e-Negotiation Workshop, pp. 631–637 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kowalcyzk, R., Bui, V.: On fuzzy e-negotiation agents: Autonomous negotiation with incomplete and imprecise information. In: Proceedings Dexa e-Negotiation Workshop (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luo, X., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H., Lee, J.: A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiation in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence 148(1–2), 53–102 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo, X., Zhang, C., Jennings, N.: A hybrid model of sharing between fuzzy, uncertain and default reasoning models in multi-agent systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge Based Systems 10(4), 401–450 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ma, H., Leung, H.F.: An adaptive attitude bidding strategy for agents in continuous double auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 6, 383–398 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matos, N., Sierra, C.: Evolutionary computing and negotiating agents. In: Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1571, pp. 126–150. Springer-Verlag, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Anthony, N.R. Jennings: Developing a bidding agent for multiple heterogeneous auctions. ACM transactions on Internet Technology 3(3), 185–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Priest, C., Bartolini, C., I. Philips: Algorithm design for agents which participate in multiple simultaneous auctions. In: In Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce III (LNAI), pp. 139–154. Springer, Berlin, German (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Stone, Littman, M., S. Singh, M. Kearns: Attac-2000: An adaptive autonomous bidding agent. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 15, 189–206 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, NY (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18(1), 183–190 (1988)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yager, R.R.: Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 59, 125–148 (1993)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yager, R.R.: OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part B: Cybernetics 34(5), 1952–1963 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yao, J.: An introduction to web-based support systems. Journal of Intelligent Systems 17(1–3), 267–281 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal Human Computer Studies 48, 125–141 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology, SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations