From Media Spaces to Emplaced Media: Digital Poster Boards and Community Connectedness

  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
  • Les Nelson
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)

The influence of research in media spaces and desktop-based video communication portals extends to other forms of media experience. In this chapter we describe our work on interactive digital community bulletin boards. We give a brief overview of five installations of interactive poster boards, focusing on the similarities and differences in the details of the installation design, the setting and the adoption, and appropriation of the technology. Public space communication gives us another way to reflect on past models and elaborating future models of “informated” environments designed to promote social connection.

Keywords

Bulletin Board Public Display Computer Support Cooperative Work Interactive Poster Personal Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baecker, R., Harrison, S., Buxton, B. Poltrock, S. and Churchill, E.F. Media spaces: past visions, current realities, future promise. In Proceedings of CHI 2008. New York, ACM Press, pp. 2245–2248, 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Bly, S., Harrison, S., and Irwin, S. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28–47, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1984, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, S., Churchill, E.F., Denoue, L., Helfman, J., and Nelson, L., Digital graffiti: public annotation of multimedia content, CHI 2004, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, Edward S.: The Fate of Place — A Philosophical History, California, University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Churchill, E. F. and Bly, S. Virtual environments at work: ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, 99–108, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Churchill, E.F. and Nelson, L., Interactive community bulletin boards as conversational hubs and sites for playful visual repartee, to appear in persistent conversations track at HICSS 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Churchill, E.F. and Nelson, L., Information flows in a gallery-work-entertainment space: The effect of a digital bulletin board on social encounters. To appear in Human Organization.Google Scholar
  9. Churchill, E.F., Nelson, L. Denoue, L., Murphy, P., Helfman, J., The plasma poster network social hypermedia on public display, in public and situated displays. In: K. O'Hara, M. Perry, E. Churchill and D. Russell (Eds.) Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies. London, Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Churchill, E.F., Girgensohn, A., Nelson, L., and Lee, A., Blending digital and physical spaces for ubiquitous community, Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 38–44, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Churchill, E., Nelson, L., and Hsieh, G. Café life in the digital age: augmenting information flow in a café-work-entertainment space. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, Extended Abstracts, pp. 123–128. New York, ACM Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchill, E., Sullivan, J., Golovchinsky, G., and Snowdon, D. Collaborative and co-operative information seeking: CSCW'98 Workshop Report, SIGGROUP Bulletin, 20(1), 56–59, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Churchill, E.F., Trevor, J., Bly, S., Nelson, L., and Cubranic, D. Anchored conversations: chatting in the context of a document. CHI 2000. New York, ACM Press, pp. 454–461, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, H. H. Using language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. Curtis, P., Dixon, M., Frederick, R., and Nichols, D. A. The jupiter sudio/video architecture: secure multimedia in network Places. ACM Multimedia 1995: 79–90, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., and Henderson, A. Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5(1), 33–62, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 541–547, May 3–7, 1992.Google Scholar
  19. Durnell Cramton, C. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3):346–371, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., and Rice, R. Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Proceedings of CHI′92. ACM, New York, pp. 37–48, 1992.Google Scholar
  21. Gaver, W. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW′92, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. Gaver, W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., Lovstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K., and Buxton, W. Realizing a Video Environment: EuroPARC's RAVE System. Proceedings of ACM CHI′92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 27–35, May 3–7, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. Goffman, E. On face-work. Interaction Ritual. New York, Anchor Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  25. Goodwin, C. Pointing as situated practice. In Sotaro Kita. Mahwah (eds.). Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 217–41, 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Harrison, S. and S. Minneman. The Media Space: A Research Project into the Use of Video as a Design Medium. PaloAlto, CA, Xerox Corporation, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proceedings of the ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW′96 (Boston, MA), pp. 67–76. New York, ACM, 1996.Google Scholar
  28. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Media space and communicative asymmetries: preliminary observations of video mediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 315–346, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C. and Benford, S. Virtually missing the point: configuring CVEs for object-focused interaction. In: Churchill, E. F., Snowdon, D. N. et al. (Ed.) Collaborative Virtual Environments. Springer, London, pp. 115–42, 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Hindus, D., Ackerman, M., Mainwaring, S. D., Starr, B. Thunderwire: A field study of an audio-only media space. Proceedings of CSCW 1996, pp. 238–247, 1996.Google Scholar
  31. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S.D., Leduc, N., Hagstrom, A.E., and Bayley, O Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the Home. Proceedings of CHI 2001 pp. 325–332, 2001.Google Scholar
  32. Hoskins, J. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. London, Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  33. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms, Proceedings of CHI ′97, New York, ACM, pp. 234–241, 1997.Google Scholar
  34. Kendon, A. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  35. Komter, A.E. Social Solidarity and the Gift. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  36. Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., and Siegel, J. Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human–Computer Interaction, 18: 13–49, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  38. Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/lombard.html, 1997.
  39. Low, S. and Lawrence-Zuniga, D. The Anthropology of Space and Place, Blackwell, Oxford, 2003.Google Scholar
  40. Mantei, M., Baecker, R., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., Milligan, T., and Wellman, B. Experiences in the use of a media space. Proceedings of CHI′91. New York, ACM, pp. 203–208, 1991.Google Scholar
  41. Marshall, C., Price, M.N., Golovchinsky, G., and Schilit, B.N. Introducing a digital library reading appliance into a reading group.” In Proceedings of ACM Digital Libraries 99. New York, ACM, pp. 77–84, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, D. Why some things matter. In: Miller, D. (Ed.) Material Cultures. London/Chicago: UCL Press/University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–21, 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Nardi, B. A. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp. 1–20, 1996.Google Scholar
  44. Nelson, L. and Churchill, E.F. Repurposing: techniques for reuse and integration of interactive systems, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, September 2006.Google Scholar
  45. Pedersen, E., McCall, K., Moran, T. and Halasz, F. Tivoli. An electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings. Proceedings of InterCHI, Amsterdam, April 1993, 1993.Google Scholar
  46. Pedersen, E. and Sokoler, T. AROMA — Abstract representation of mediated presence supporting mutual awareness. Proceedings of CHI 97 Conference, Atlanta, ACM, 1997.Google Scholar
  47. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Savolainen, R. Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of ‘Way of Life.’ Library and Information Science Research 17, 259–294, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sellen, A.J. Assessing video-mediated conduct: a comparison of different analytic approaches. In: K. Finn, A. Sellen, and S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated Communication, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 95–106, 1997.Google Scholar
  50. Stults, R. Media space. Xerox PARC technical report, 1986.Google Scholar
  51. Suh, K.S. Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: an examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35, 295–312, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tang, John C., Ellen A. Isaacs, and Monica Rua. Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions, Proc. CSCW ′94, pp. 23–34, 1994.Google Scholar
  53. Yamada, T., Shingu, J., Churchill, E.F., Nelson, L., Helfman, J., and Murphy, P. Who cares? Reflecting who is reading what on distributed community bulletin boards. Proceedings of UIST 2004, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth F. Churchill
    • 1
  • Les Nelson
    • 2
  1. 1.Yahoo! Research2821 Mission College Blvd.Santa ClaraUSA
  2. 2.Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.3333 Coyote Hill Road Palo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations