Advertisement

A Generic and Configurable Electronic Informer to Assist the Evaluation of Agent-Based Interactive Systems

  • Chi Dung Tran
  • Houcine Ezzedine
  • Christophe Kolski
Conference paper

Abstract

The evaluation of user interactive systems has been an active subject of research for many years. Many methods have been proposed but most existing evaluation methods do not take the specific architecture of an agent-based interactive system into account, nor do they focus on the coupling between the architecture and evaluation phase. In this article, we propose an agent-based architecture of interactive systems that is considered as being mixed (it is both functional and structural). On the basis of this architecture, we propose a generic and configurable model of an evaluation tool, called “electronic informer,” designed to assist evaluators in analyzing and evaluating interactive systems with such architecture.

Keywords

Interactive System Configurable Model Interactive Application Interface Agent Public Transport System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present research work has been partially supported by the Ministère de l’Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie, the Région Nord Pas-de-Calais, the FEDER (MIAOU, EUCUE, SART), the ANR ADEME (Viatic.Mobilité), and the PREDIM (MouverPerso).

References

  1. 1.
    Bass L, Little R, Pellegrino R, Reed S (1991) The Arch model: Seeheim revisited. Proceedings of User Interface Developers’ Workshop, Seeheim.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastien JMC, Scapin DL (1995) Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria. Int J Hum–Comput Interact, 7, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coutaz J (1987) PAC, an object-oriented model for dialog design. In: Bullinger H-J, Shackel B (eds.), INTERACT 87, Second IFIP International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, September 1–4, 1987, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 431–436.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coutaz J, Nigay L (2001) Architecture logicielle conceptuelle des systèmes interactifs, chapter 7 of “Analyse et Conception de l’Interaction Homme-Machine dans les systèmes d’information”. In: Kolski (ed.), Environnements évolués et évaluation de l’IHM, Éditions Hermes, Paris, pp. 207–246.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Etgen M, Cantor J (1999) What does getting WET (Web event-logging tool) mean for Web usability? User Experience Engineering Division, AT&T Labs, Middletown, NJ, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grislin-Le Strugeon E, Adam E, Kolski C (2001) Agents intelligents en interaction homme-machine dans les systèmes d’information. In: Kolski C (ed.), Environnements évolués et évaluation de l’IHM, Éditions Hermes, Paris, pp. 207–248.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg A (1983) Smaltalk-80, the interactive programming environnement. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong IJ, Heer J, Waterson S (2001) WebQuilt: A proxy-based approach to remote Web usability testing. In: ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 19(3), 263–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering, Academic, Boston, MA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paganelli L, Paterno F (2002) Intelligent analysis of user interactions with Web applications. In: Proceedings of ACM IUI 2002, January 2002, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paterno F, Ballardin G (2000) RemUSINE: a bridge between empirical and model-based evaluation when evaluators and users are distant. Interact Comput, 13(2), 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pfaff GE (1985) User Interface Management System. Springer,Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    SART (2007) Système d’Aide à la Régulation de Trafic du réseau de transport valenciennois et de ses pôles d’échanges. Final report, co-operative project SART, INRETS, France.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shneiderman B (1998) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tarpin-Bernard F, David B (1999) AMF: un modèle d’architecture multi-agents multi-facettes. TSI, 18, 555–586.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trabelsi A, Ezzedine H, Kolski C (2004) Architecture modelling and evaluation of agent-based interactive systems. In: Proc. IEEE SMC 2004, October, The Hague, pp. 5159–5164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chi Dung Tran
    • 1
  • Houcine Ezzedine
    • 1
  • Christophe Kolski
    • 1
  1. 1.LAMIH–UMR CNRS 8530University of Valenciennes and Hainaut-CambrésisFrance

Personalised recommendations