Advertisement

Model-Driven Engineering of Workflow User Interfaces

  • Josefina  Guerrero García
  • Christophe Lemaigre
  • Jean Vanderdonckt
  • Juan  Manuel González Calleros
Conference paper

Abstract

A model-driven engineering method is presented that provides designers with methodological guidance on how to systematically derive user interfaces of workflow information systems from a series of models. For this purpose, a workflow is recursively decomposed into processes that are in turn decomposed into tasks. Each task gives rise to a task model whose structure, ordering, and connection with the domain model allows a semi-automated generation of corresponding user interfaces by model-to-model transformation. Reshuffling tasks within a same process or reordering processes within a same workflow is straightforwardly propagated as a natural consequence of the mapping model used in the model-driven ­engineering. The various models involved in the method can be edited in a graphical editor based on Petri nets and simulated interactively. This editor also contains a set of workflow user interface patterns that are ready to use. The output file generated by the editor can then be exploited by a workflow execution engine to produce a running workflow system.

Keywords

Business Process Task Model Graph Transformation Organizational Unit Graphical Notation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Stavness, N., Schneider, K.A.: Supporting Flexible Business Processes with a Progression Model. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Making model-based user interface design practical: usable and open methods and tools MBUI’2004 (Funchal, January 13, 2004) CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 103. Accessible at http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS//Vol-103/stavness-et-al.pdf.
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems 30, 4 (2005) 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Hee, K., Oanea, O., Post, R., Somers, van der Werf, J.M.: Yasper: a tool for workflow modeling and analysis. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Application of Concurrency to System Design (2006) 279–282.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In: Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language, Concepts, and Tools UML’2001 (Toronto, October 1–5, 2001). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2185. Springer, Berlin (2001) pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, H. B., Kim, J. W., Park, S. J.: KWM: Knowledge-based Workflow Model for Agile Organization. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 13 (1999) 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Kumar, A.: XML Based Schema Definition for Support of Inter-organizational Workflow. In: Proc. of 21st Int. Conf. on Application and Theory of Petri Nets ICATPN’2000. LNCS, Vol. 1825. Springer, Berlin (2000) 475–484.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Workflow Resource Patterns: Identification, Representation, and Too Support. In: Proc. of 17th Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering CAiSE’2005 (Porto, June 13–17, 2005). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3520. Springer, Berlin (2005) 216–232.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kristiansen, R., Trætteberg, H.: Model-Based User Interface Design in the Context of Workflow Models. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design TAMODIA’2007 (Toulouse, November 7–9, 2007). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4849. Springer, Berlin (2007) pp. 227–239.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stolze, M., Riand, Ph., Wallace, M., Heath, T.: Agile Development of Workflow Applications with Interpreted Task Models. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design TAMODIA’2007 (Toulouse, November 7–9, 2007). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4849. Springer, Berlin (2007) 2–14.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guerrero, J., Vanderdonckt, J., Gonzalez, J.M.: FlowiXML: A Step Towards Designing Workflow Management Systems. Journal of Web Engineering 4, 2 (2008) 163–182.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management. Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers 8, 1 (1998) 21–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paternò, F. Model-based design and evaluation of interactive applications. Springer (1999).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Puerta, A.R.: A Model-Based Interface Development Environment. IEEE Software 14, 4 (1997) 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Souchon, N., Vanderdonckt, J.: A review of XML-compliant user interface description languages. In: Proc. of DSV-IS’2003. Springer, Berlin (2003) 377–391.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., Vanderdonckt, J.: A Unifying Reference Framework for Multi-Target User Interfaces. Interacting with Computers 15, 3 (2003) 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mandviwalla, M., Olfman, L.: What do groups need? A proposed set of generic groupware requirements. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1, 3 (1994) 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palanque, P., Farenc, Ch., Bastide, R.: Embedding Ergonomic Rules as Generic Requirements in a Formal Development Process of Interactive Software. In: Proc. of IFIP TC 13 Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction Interact’99 (Edinburgh, September 1–4, 1999). IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999) 408–416.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adam, E., Kolski, C., Mandiau, R., Vergison, E.: A software engineering workbench for modeling groupware activities. In: C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI: inclusive design in the information society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2003) pp. 1499–1503.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josefina  Guerrero García
    • 1
  • Christophe Lemaigre
    • 1
  • Jean Vanderdonckt
    • 1
  • Juan  Manuel González Calleros
    • 1
  1. 1.Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain School of Management (LSM)Louvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations