Simulation-Enabled Approach for Defect Prediction and Avoidance in Forming Product Development

  • M. W. Fu
  • J. Lu
Conference paper

Abstract

In the current metal-forming product development paradigm, productivity, quality and production cost are three overriding issues. Among them, the product quality is the most critical one. In up-front design process, prediction and assessment of product quality is a non-trivial issue as there are many factors affecting product quality, which could include material metallurgical, mechanical plastic and thermal behaviours and the interaction and interplay in-between the billet material and tooling. Furthermore, the metal-formed part design, process determination and configuration, tooling design also affect the product quality. To ensure the “right the first time design” from product quality improvement perspective, all the affecting factors need to be investigated and their relationship with product quality to be established. In this paper, a simulation-enabled process and tooling configuration for product quality improvement is addressed and the methodology for prediction of product quality via plastic flow simulation is presented. Through case studies, the developed approach is illustrated and its efficiency is verified.

Keywords

FE Simulation Metal forming Integrated product and process design Product quality improvement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  1. [1]
    Kobayashi S., Oh S.I., and Altan T., (1989) Metal Forming and the Finite element Method, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bariani P.F., Dal Negro T., and Bruschi S., (2004) Testing and modeling of material response to deformation in bulk metal forming, Annals of the CIRP, 53/2Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Fu M.W. and Luo Z.J., (1992) The prediction of macro defects during the isothermal forging process by the rigid-viscoplastic Finite-Element Method, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 32:599–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fu M.W., Yong M.S., Tong K.K. and Muramatsu T., (2006) A methodology for evaluation of metal forming system design and performance via CAE simulation, Int. J. Prod. Res., 44:1075–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Datta A.K., Das G., De P.K., Ramachandrarao P. and Mukhopadhyaya M., Finite element modeling of rolling process and optimization of process parameter, (2006) Materials Science and Engineering A, 426:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hartly P. and Pillinger, Numerical simulation of the forging process, (2006), Comput. Methods Appl. MEch. Engrg, 195:6676–6690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bariani P.F., Negro T. Dal and S. Bruschi, (2004) Testing and modeling of material response to deformation in bulk metal forming, Annals of the CIRP, 2Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fu M.W., Yong M.S. and Muramatsu T., (2007) Die fatigue life design and assessment via CAE simulation, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol, On-lineGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tong K.K., Yong M.S., Fu M.W., Muramatsu T., Goh C.S. and Zhang S.X., (2005) A CAE enabled methodology for die fatigue life analysis and improvement, Int. J. Prod. Res., 43:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fu M.W., Yong M.S., Tong K.K. and Wong C.C., (2005) CAE supported design solution generation in metal forming product development, Trans. of the NAMRC, 33:375–382Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Lange K., Cser L., Geiger M. and Kals J.A.G., (1992) Tool life and tool quality in bulk metal forming, Annals pf the CIRP, 41/2:667–675Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Petty D.M., (1996) Application of process modeling: an industrial view, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 421–426Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bariani P.F., Bruschi S., Dal N.T., (2004) Integrating physical and numerical simulation techniques to design the hot forging process of stainless steel turbine blades, Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44/9:945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Falk B., Engel U. and Geiger M., (1998) Estimation of tool life in bulk metal forming based on different failure concepts”, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 80–81:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Mungi M.P., Rasane S.D. and Dixit P.M., (2003) Residual stresses in cold axisymmetric forging, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 142:256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    MacCormack C. and Monagham J., (2001) Failure analysis of cold forging dies using FEA, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 117:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Fu M.W. and Luo Z.J., (1995) The simulation of the visco-plastic forming process by the Finite-Element Method, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 55:442–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Cho H., Ngaile G. and Altan T., (2003) Simultaneous Determination of Flow Stress and Interface Friction by Finite Element Based Inverse Analysis Technique, Annals of the CIRP, 52,:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lee C.H. and Kobayashi S., (1973) New solution to rigid-plastic deformation problems using a matrix method, Trans. ASME, J. Engr Ind., 95:865–873.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    DEFORM, Version 6.1, (2006) Scientific Forming technologies Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. W. Fu
    • 1
  • J. Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloon, Hong Kong

Personalised recommendations