Science of Ultrasound and Echocardiography

Chapter

Abstract

For anyone seeking to achieve proficiency in transesophageal echocardiography, it is important to have a solid understanding of the underlying science of ultrasound, along with knowledge of the instrumentation and equipment utilized for cardiac imaging. This chapter provides a review of all of these topics, particularly as they apply to echocardiography. Basic principles of sound will first be discussed, followed by the process of ultrasonic two-dimensional image formation. Principles of Doppler echocardiography (and its applications) will then be presented. Finally, echocardiography instrumentation, echocardiographic artifacts, and digital archiving/networking of echocardiographic studies will be discussed. Familiarity with the information in this chapter will provide readers a greater understanding of the many technical aspects of echocardiography, enabling them to optimize their cardiac ultrasound platforms so that the best possible information can be obtained.

Keywords

Ultrasound physics B-mode imaging Phased array transducers Doppler echocardiography Spectral Doppler Color flow Doppler DICOM 

References

  1. 1.
    Zagzebski JA. Essentials of ultrasound physics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Medical imaging physics. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbs V, Cole D, Sassano A. Ultrasound physics and technology: how, why and when. Edinburgh/New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feigenbaum H. History of echocardiography. In: Feigenbaum’s echocardiography. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denny MW. Air and water: the biology and physics of life’s media. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Ultrasound waves. In: Medical imaging physics. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. p. 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shankar H, Pagel PS. Potential adverse ultrasound-related biological effects: a critical review. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:1109–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauvin A, Cloutier G, Germain M. Principles of ultrasound. In: Denault AY, Couture P, Vegas A, Buithieu J, Tardif J-C, editors. Transesophageal echocardiography multimedia manual: a perioperative transdisciplinary approach. 2nd ed. New York/London: Informa Healthcare; 2011. p. 1–18.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hendee WR, Ritenour ER. Ultrasound transducers. In: Medical imaging physics. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. p. 317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prager RW, Ijaz UZ, Gee AH, Treece GM, Wells PNT. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2010;224:193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabben SI. Technical principles of transthoracic three-dinensional echocardiography. In: Badano LP, Lang RM, Zamorano JL, editors. Textbook of real-time three dimensional echocardiography. London: Springer; 2011. p. 9–24.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salgo IS. 3D transesophageal echocardiographic technologies. In: Badano LP, Lang RM, Zamorano JL, editors. Textbook of real-time three dimensional echocardiography. London: Springer; 2011. p. 25–32.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maslow A, Perrino AC. Principles and technology of two-dimensional echocardiography. In: Reeves ST, editor. A practical approach to transesophageal echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia/London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 3–23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erb J. Basic principles of physics in echocardiographic imaging and Doppler techniques. In: Feneck RO, Kneeshaw J, Ranucci M, editors. Core topics in transesophageal echocardiography. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Real-time ultrasound instrumentation. In: Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 129–54.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bulwer BE, Shernan SK, Thomas JD. Physics of echocardiography. In: Savage RM, Aronson S, editors. Comprehensive textbook of perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 3–41.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evans DH, McDicken WN. Doppler ultrasound: physics, instrumentation, and signal processing. 2nd ed. Chichester/New York: Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC, et al. Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:465–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gaspar T, Adawi S, Sachner R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(7):749–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saitoh T, Shiota M, Izumo M, et al. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1626–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Otto CM, Bonow RO. Valvular heart disease: a companion to braunwald’s heart disease. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Hemodynamics. In: Armstrong WF, Ryan T, Feigenbaum H, editors. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 217–40.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Evaluation of systolic function of the left ventricle. In: Armstrong WF, Ryan T, Feigenbaum H, editors. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 123–57.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chassot P-G, Toussignant C. Basic principles of Doppler ultrasound. In: Denault AY, Couture P, Vegas A, Buithieu J, Tardif J-C, editors. Transesophageal echocardiography multimedia manual: a perioperative transdisciplinary approach. 2nd ed. New York/London: Informa Healthcare; 2011. p. 19–49.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gorcsan J, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1401–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zagzebski JA. Image characteristics and artifacts. In: Essentials of ultrasound physics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 123–47.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas JD. The DICOM image formatting standard: what it means for echocardiographers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995;8:319–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas JD, Adams DB, Devries S, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for digital echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:287–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pianykh OS. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. Berlin: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Evangelista A, Flachskampf F, Lancellotti P, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for standardization of performance, digital storage and reporting of echocardiographic studies. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:438–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Picard MH, Adams D, Bierig SM, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations