Advertisement

Browser Augmentation

  • Vicki L. HansonEmail author
  • John T. Richards
  • Cal Swart
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

In this chapter we examine ways of programmatically expanding the functionality of conventional browsers. We consider various mechanisms for creating extensions and add-ons in Internet Explorer and Firefox and briefly review other browsers. We explore some existing browser extensions. The focus is on accessibility extensions, but some prominent other examples of browser extensions are also mentioned. Information for using and creating various types of extensions is presented. Finally, the usefulness of browser extensions compared with other accessibility enablement options for the Web is considered.

Keywords

Proxy Server Secure Socket Layer Internet Explorer Style Sheet Document Object Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Asakawa, C. & Itoh, T. (1998). User interface of a Home Page Reader. In Proceedings of the Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Marina del Rey, California, United States, April 15–17, 1998). Assets '98. ACM Press, New York, 149–156.Google Scholar
  2. Hanson, V. L., Brezin, J., Crayne, S., Keates, S., Kjeldsen, R., Richards, J. T., Swart, C., & Trewin, S. (2005). Improving Web accessibility through an enhanced open-source browser. IBM Systems Journal, 44 (3), 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanson, V. L. & Richards, J. T. (2004). A Web Accessibility Service: An Update and Findings. Proceedings of the Sixth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, ASSETS 2004. New York: ACM. pp 169–176.Google Scholar
  4. Hanson, V. L., Snow-Weaver, A., & Trewin, S. (2006). Software personalization to meet the needs of older adults. Gerontechnology, 5 (3), 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Muta, H., Ohko, T., & Yoshinaga, H. (2005). An activeX-based accessibility solution for senior citizens. Proceedings of the Center On Disabilities Technology And Persons With Disabilities Conference 2005. Available at http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2005/proceedings/2227.htm
  6. Roberts, S. (1999) Exploring Microsoft Internet Explorer 5. Microsoft Press: Redmond, WA.Google Scholar
  7. Richards, J. T. & Hanson, V. L. (2004). Web accessibility: A broader view. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ACM World Wide Web Conference, WWW2004. p. 72–79.Google Scholar
  8. Sa-nga-ngam, P. & Kurniawan, S. (2007). An investigation of older persons' browser usage. Proceedings of HCI International - Universal Access in HCI, Volume 5. Beijing, China. July 22–27, 2007. Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Sloan, D. (2006). The Effectiveness of the Web Accessibility Audit as a Motivational and Educational Tool in Inclusive Web Design. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dundee, Scotland. June, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Trewin, S. (2000). Configuration agents, control and privacy, in Proceedings of CUU'00 (Arlington, VA, November, 2000), ACM Press, 9–16.Google Scholar
  11. Zajicek, M., Powell, C., & Reeves, C. (1998). A Web navigation tool for the blind. In Proceedings of the Third international ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Marina del Rey, California, United States, April 15–17, 1998). Assets '98. ACM Press, New York, 204–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM, T.J. Waston Research CenterHawtharneUSA

Personalised recommendations