Advertisement

Maintenance in the Rail Industry

  • Jørn Vatn
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

This chapter presents two case studies of maintenance optimization in the rail industry. The first case study discusses grouping of maintenance activities into maintenance packages. The second case study uses a life cycle cost approach to prioritize between maintenance and renewal projects under budget constraints.

Keywords

Preventive Maintenance Maintenance Activity Life Cycle Cost Cost Benefit Ratio Candidate Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

21.6 References

  1. Bing AJ, Gross A, (1983) Development of Railroad Track Degradation Models. Transportation Research Record 939, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdaanski S, Olzak M, Stupnicki J. (1996). Numerical stress analysis of rail rolling contact fatigue cracks. Wear 191:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Bruni S, (2006) A mathematical model to predict raiway wheel profile evolutio due to wear. Accepted for publication in Wear.Google Scholar
  4. Budai G, Huisman D, Dekker R. (2005) Scheduling Preventive Railway Maintenance Activities. Accepted for publication in Journal of the Operational Research Society.Google Scholar
  5. Carreteroa J, Pereza JM, Garcıa-Carballeiraa F, Calderona A, Fernandeza J, Garcıaa JD, Lozano A, Cardonab L, Cotainac N, Prete P, (2003) Applying RCM in large scale systems: a case study with railway networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 82:257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dekker R, Wildeman RE, Van der Duyn Schouten, FA, (1997). A Review of Multi-Component Maintenance Models with Economic Dependence. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 45:411–435.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreira L, Murray M, (1997) Modelling rail track deterioration and maintenance: current practices and future needs. Transport Reviews, 17(3): 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979). Computers and Intractability: a Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Grassie SL (2005). Rolling contact fatigue on the British railway system: treatment. Wear 258:1310–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hecke A, (1998) Effects of future mixed traffic on track deterioration. Report TRITA-FKT 1998:30, Railway Technology, Department of Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  11. Kay AJ, (1998) Behaviour of Two Layer Railway Track Ballast under Cyclic and Monotonic Loading. PhD Thesis, University of Shefield, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Li D, Selig ET, (1995) Evaluation of railway sub grade problems. Transportation Research Record. 1489:17–25.Google Scholar
  13. Meier-Hirmerl C, Sourget F, Roussignol M, (2005). Optimising the strategy of track maintenance. Advances in Safety and Reliability — KoŁowrocki (ed.) Taylor & Francis Group, London.Google Scholar
  14. OREDA, (2002) Offshore Reliability Data, 4th ed. OREDA Participants. Available from Det Norske Veritas, NO-1322 Høvik, Norway.Google Scholar
  15. Pedregala DJ, Garcıaa FP, Schmid F (2004) RCM2 predictive maintenance of railway systems based on unobserved components models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Podofillini L, Zio E, Vatn J. Risk-informed optimization of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91:20–30, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reddy V, Chattopadhyay G, Larsson-Kråik PO, Hargreaves DJ, (2006). Modelling and analysis of rail maintenance cost. Accepted for publication in International Journal of Production Economic.s Google Scholar
  18. Salim W, (2004): Deformation and degradation aspects of ballast and constitutive modeling under cyclic loading. PhD Thesis, university of Wollongong. Austrailia.Google Scholar
  19. Sato Y, (1995) Japanese studies on deterioration of ballasted track. Vehicle System Dynamics, 24:197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sriskandarajah C, Jardine, AKS, Chan, CK (1998). Maintennace scheduling of rolling stock using a genetic algorithm. European J. Oper.Res., 35:1–15.Google Scholar
  21. Telliskivi T, Olofsson U, (2004) Wheel-rail wear simulation. Wear 257 1145–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vatn J, Podofillini, P, Zio E (2003). A risk based approach to determine type of ultrasonic inspection and frequencies in railway applications. World Congress on Railway Research. Edinburgh, Scotland 28 September–1 October 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Veit P, Wogowitsch M, (2003) Track Maintenance based on life-cycle cost calculations. In Innovations for a cost effective Railway Track. www.promain.org/images/publications/Innovations-LCC.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Welte T, Vatn J, Heggset J, (2006) Markov state model for optimization of maintenance and renewal of hydro power components. 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, KTH, Stockholm, 11–15 June 2006.Google Scholar
  25. Wildeman RE (1996). The art of grouping maintenance. PhD Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Faculty of Economics.Google Scholar
  26. Zakharov S, Komarovsky I, Zharov I (1998). Wheel flange/rail head wear simulation. Wear 215. 18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zarembski AM, Palese JW, (2003) Risk Based Ultrasonic Rail Test scheduling: Practical Application in Europe and North America. 6th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2003) in Gothenburg, Sweden June 10–13, 2003Google Scholar
  28. Zhang YJ, Murray MH, Ferreira L, (1997). Railway track performance models: degradation of track structures. Road and transport Research. 6(2):4–19Google Scholar
  29. Zoeteman A, 2003. Life Cycle Management Plus. In Innovations for a cost effective Railway Track. www.promain.org/images/publications/Innovations-LCC.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jørn Vatn
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Norway

Personalised recommendations