Advertisement

A Reasoning Approach for Conflict Dealing in Collaborative Design

  • Moisés Dutra
  • Parisa Ghodous

Abstract

In collaborative design process, multidisciplinary virtual teams’ integration — involving exchange and sharing of knowledge and expertise — frequently generate a lot of conflicting situations. Different experts’ point of views and perspectives, in addition to several ways of communicating and collaborating in knowledge level, make all this process very hard to tackle. Aiming to minimize the appearance of early design conflicts and to solve the rest of them, this paper presents an approach to represent knowledge in design process based on Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL is structured to be a major formalism for the design and dissemination of ontology information. The use of OWL reasoning is intended to be a consistent way to verify the information given by several experts, trying to avoid redundancies, contradictions and misunderstoods. A prototype, based on the Function-Behavior-Structure design framework, that uses OWL to input data, was built up to validate this approach.

Keywords

Collaborative design ontology integration reasoning conflict resolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  1. [1]
    Cerebra. Available at: http://www.semtalk.com/cerebra_construct.htm. Accessed on: March, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dutra M, Slimani K, Ghodous P (2007) A Distributed and Synchronous Environment for Collaborative Work, submitted to the Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering journal (ICAE), ISSN 1069-2509, vol. 14, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Euler proof mechanism. Available at: http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/. Accessed on: March 2007.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Ferreira da Silva C, Médini L, Ghodous L (2004) Atténuation de conflits en conception coopérative [in french]. In 15èmes journées francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC’2004), Nada Matta ed. Lyon. pp. 127–138. University Press of Grenoble, Grenoble, France, ISBN 2 7061 1221 2, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F-OWL. Available at: http://fowl.sourceforge.net. Accessed on: March 2007.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ghodous P (2002) Modèles et Architectures pour l’Ingénierie Coopérative [in french]. Habilitation Thesis, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hoolet. Available at: http://owl.man.ac.uk/hoolet/. Accessed on: March 2007.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Klein M (2000) Towards a systematic repository of knowledge about managing collaborative design conflicts. In Gero J (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design’ 00, Boston. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 129–146, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kalyanpur A (2006) Debugging and Repair of OWL Ontologies. PhD Thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Matta N, Corby O (1996) Conflict Management in Concurrent Engineering: Modelling Guides. Proceedings of the European Conference in Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Conflict Management, Budapest, Hungary, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Mei J, Bontas EP (2004) Reasoning Paradigms for OWL Ontologies. Technical Report B-04-12, Institut für Informatik, Freue Universität Berlin, Germany, November 2004.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures/. Accessed on: March 2007.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Sirin E, Parsia B, Grau BC (2004) Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November 2004.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Slimani K (2006) Système d’échange et de partage de connaissances pour l’aide à la Conception Collaborative [in french]. PhD Thesis, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France, September 2006.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sriram RD (2002) Distributed and Integrated Collaborative Engineering Design. Savren, 2002. ISBN 0-9725064-0-3.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Xie H, Neelamkavil J, Wang L, Shen W and Pardasani A (2002) Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends. Proceedings of Computer-Aided Design, vol. 34, pp. 981–996, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moisés Dutra
    • 1
  • Parisa Ghodous
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Lyon 1Lyon
  2. 2.Images and Information SystemsLIRIS — Laboratory of Computer GraphicsVilleurabanne cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations