Development of a Management Tool for Assessing Environmental Performance in SMEs’ Design and Production

  • Tim Woolman
  • Alireza Veshagh


Small and medium sized manufacturers offer opportunities in reducing life cycle impacts, as green demand cascades through supply chains, and challenges due to their lack of environmental management and life cycle engineering skills. This research explored existing management tools to meet manufacturing SMEs reported need for self assessment. Drawing on the principles of environmental performance evaluation, this paper presents the development and application of a spreadsheet tool for diagnosing environmental performance in SMEs’ product design and production and relates it to the tools used recently in the UK by Perform and Benchmark Index and the ecoBiz assessment used in Australia.


Manufacturing SME Environmental Performance Management Tool 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    NetRegs, 2005, SME-nvironment 2005, London, UK, Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Eagan, P.D. and Joeres, E., 1997. Development of a facility-based environmental performance indicator related to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 5(4), pp. 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Small Business Service, 2005, Annual Small Business Survey 2004, London, UK, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Woolman, T.C., Veshagh, A., 2006 Designing Support for Manufacturing SMEs Approaching Eco Design & Cleaner Production — Learning from UK Survey Results, 13th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Olsthoorn, X., Tyteca, D., Wehrmeyer, W. and Wagner, M., 2001. Environmental indicators for business: a review of the literature and standardisation methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5), pp. 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wells, R.H., Hockman, M. N., Hockman, S.D., and O’Connell, P.A., 1992, Total Quality Environmental Management, 1(4), pp. 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lewis, H. & Gertsakis, J., 2001, Design + Environment, Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Technical Committee 207, 1999. ISO 14031: Environmental management-Environmental performance evaluation-Guidelines. Geneva: International Standards Organisation.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Sorrell, S., Hertin, J. and Cirillo, M., 2005. Statistical analysis of the PERFORM dataset. Brighton UK: SPRU-University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Neely, A. and Adams, C., 2002. Manufacturing-a sector study: The performance of manufacturing companies within Benchmark Index. Benchmark Index.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kanduri, K. and Cole, J., 2006. State government initiative to promote eco-efficiency in industry-an Australian experience, G. Huppes, J. Guinée and M. Ishikawa, eds. In: 2nd Quantified Eco-efficiency for Sustainable Development Conference, 29–30 June 2006, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Woolman
    • 1
  • Alireza Veshagh
    • 1
  1. 1.Warwick Manufacturing GroupUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations