Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics pp 197-211

Part of the Computational Biology book series (COBO, volume 6)

Anatomical Ontologies: Linking Names to Places in Biology

  • Richard A. Baldock
  • Albert Burger

Summary

An ontology captures knowledge of a domain in a structured and well-defined way. Anatomy provides a conceptual framework for the parts and tissues of an organism including structural (parts and sub-parts), functional (system elements), developmental (change of structure during embryogenesis) and derivation. Anatomy is also used to define place or spatial location. This can be in the form of topological relationships, e.g. adjacency or connectedness, or geometric, e.g. distance and direction. Atlases provide a direct or iconic framework to describe the spatial organisation of an organism with no reference to the conceptual anatomical framework. In this chapter we discuss how anatomical and atlas frameworks can be used to provide a rich ontology encompassing both conceptual, topological and geometric spaces. We also introduce the notion of a natural coordinate system both as a robust tool for navigation within an organism (e.g. the mouse embryo) and as a mechanism for cross-atlas interoperability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.A. Baldock, J. Bard, M.H. Kaufman, and D Davidson. A real mouse for your computer.BioEssays, 14:501–502, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richard Baldock, Jonathan Bard, Albert Burger, Nicolas Burton, Jeff Christiansen,Guangjie Feng, Bill Hill, Derek Houghton, Mathew Kaufman, Jianguo Rao, JamesSharpe, Allyson Ross, Peter Stevenson, Shanmugasundaram Venkataraman, AndrewWaterhouse,Yiya Yang, and Duncan Davidson. Emap and emage: A framework for understandingspatially organised data. Neuroinformatics, pages 309–325, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. W. Ballard. Comparative Anatomy and Embryology. Ronald Press, USA, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American,May 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albert Burger, Duncan Davidson, and Richard Baldock. Formalization of mouse embryoanatomy. Bioinformatics, 20:259–267, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Casati and A.C. Varzi. Parts and Places, The Structures of Spatial Representation. TheMIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duncan Davidson and Richard Baldock. Bioinformatics beyond sequence: Mapping genefunction in the embryo. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2:409–418, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. de Roure, N.R. Jennings, and N. Shadbolt. The semantic grid: A future e-scienceinfrastructure. In F. Berman, G. Fox, and A.J.G. Hey, editors, Grid Computing - Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, pages 437–470. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5:199–220, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isam Hilal, Serge van Sint Jan, Alberto Leardini, and Ugo Della Croce. D3.2 final reporton data collection procedure - annex 1. Technical report, University of Brussels, 2002.Report from EU project 10954 Virtual Animation of the Kinematics of the Human forIndustrial Educational and Research Purposes.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janet Kerwin, Mark Scott, James Sharpe, Luis Puelles, Stephen C Robson, Margaret Martinezde-la Torre, Jose Luis Ferran, Guangjie Feng, Richard Baldock, Tom Strachan, DuncanDavidson, and Susan Lindsay. 3 dimensional modelling of early human brain developmentusing optical projection tomography. BMC Neuroscience, 5:27, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson Maciel, Luciana Porcher Nedel, and Carla Maria Dal Sasso Freitas. Anatomybasedjoint models for virtual human skeletons. In Computer Animation 2002 (CA 2002), 19-21 June 2002, Geneva, Switzerland, pages 220–224. IEEE Computer Society, 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allan MacKenzie-Graham, Erh-Fang Lee, Ivo D Dinov, Mihail Bota, David W Shattuck,Seth Ruffins, Heng Yuan, Fotios Konstantinidis, Alain Pitiot, Yi Ding, Guogang Hu, RussellE Jacobs, and Arthur W Toga. A multimodal, multidimensional atlas of the c57bl/6jmouse brain. J Anat, 204(2):93–102, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    George Paxinos and Keith B. J. Franklin. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates.Academic Press, San Diego, 2nd edition, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Rosse and J.L.V. Mejino. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the foundationalmodel of anatomy. Biomedical Informatics, 36:478–500, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.J. Surma, J.T. Srzednicki, D.I. Barnett, and F.V. Rickey, editors. Stanislaw Le’sniewski: Collected Works. Kluwer Academic Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karl Theiler. The House Mouse. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. L. Williams, R. Warwick, M. Dyson, and L. H. Bannister, editors. Gray’s Anatomy.Churchill Livingstone, London, 37 edition, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morton E. Winston, Roger Chaffin, and Douglas Herrmann. A taxonomy of part-wholerelations. Cognitive Science, 11:417–444, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Albert Burger, Duncan Davidson, Richard Baldock 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Baldock
  • Albert Burger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations