Access and Semantic Level Integration of Building Models for Cooperative Fire Protection Planning

  • M. Lange
  • U Rüppel


Planning processes in civil engineering are characterized by a large number of participants and a high amount of planning information stored in distributed and heterogeneous partial models. A main goal of the presented project is to provide engineers with integrated views on the relevant technical planning information. To realise this, two aspects have to be considered: access level integration and semantic level integration. For the integration of partial models on the access level, different approaches like Web Services and mobile agents have been developed in the last several years. An agent-based approach for model integration is presented in the first part of the paper. However, in this context the core problem is the implicit and frequently inconsistent semantics of the information. Thus, the second focus of the paper is on the interoperability on the semantic level. To provide engineers with integrated transparent views on the model data, domain specific ontologies and mappings between these ontologies and different database schemas have been developed. A combined approach for the integration of distributed heterogeneous partial models in civil engineering planning processes on the access level and the semantic level is presented in this paper.


building models heterogeneity software agents semantic integration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. Barrett T, Jones D, Yuan J, Sawaya J, Uschold M, Adams T, Folger D (2002) RDF Representation of Metadata for Semantic Integration of Corporate Information Resources. International Workshop, Real World RDF and Semantic Web Applications, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  2. Bellifemine F (2006) Jade-Java Agent Development Framework, TiLab, Turin, Italia. ( Scholar
  3. Bilek J, Hartmann D (2003) Development of an Agent-based Workbench supporting Collaborative Structural Design. In: The 20th CIB W78 Conference on Information Technology in Construction. New Zealand.Google Scholar
  4. de Bruijn J (2004) Semantic Integration of Disparate Data Sources in the COG Project. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  5. Busse S, Kutsche RD, Leser U, Weber H (1999) Federated Information Systems: Concepts, Terminology and Architectures. Forschungsberichte des Fachbereichs Informatik, Bericht Nr. 99-9, Technische Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Dou D, LePendu P (2006) Ontology-based Integration for Relational Databases. Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, DBTTA Track, Dijon, France.Google Scholar
  7. FIPA (2006) Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. ( Scholar
  8. Hartmann D, Meißner UF, Rüppel U, Bilek J, Theiss M (2004) Integration of Product Model Databases into Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of the Xth International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE-X).Google Scholar
  9. IAI-International Alliance for Interoperability (2002) ifcXML-Schema Definition-Version 1.02. ( Scholar
  10. Katzenbach R, Meißner UF, Rüppel U, Giere J, Greb S (2002) Process-oriented Network-based Collaboration in Geotechnical Engineering. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering Vol. II, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  11. Löbbert A, Pohl KD, Thomas KW (2000) Brandschutzplanung für Architekten und Ingenieure. Köln: Verlag Rudolf Müller.Google Scholar
  12. Meißner UF, Rüppel U, Theiß M (2002) Verteilte Brandschutzmodellierung auf der Basis von Software-Agenten. In Bauen mit Computern-Kooperation in IT-Netzwerken, Bonn, Fortschritt-Bericht VDI, 557–569.Google Scholar
  13. Protégé (2006) Ontology Editor and Knowledge-base Framework. Stanford Medical Informatics ( Scholar
  14. Rüppel U, Meißner UF, Theiss M (2002) Fire Protection Concepts With Mobile Agents. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop of the European Group for Intelligent Computing in Engineering (EG-ICE), Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  15. Rüppel U, Meißner UF, Lange M (2006a) Kooperative Brandschutzplanung mit Software-Agenten. In: Internationales Kolloquium über Anwendungen der Informatik und der Mathematik in Architektur und Bauwesen, Weimar.Google Scholar
  16. Rüppel U, Lange M (2006) Network-based Agent-and Process Modelling-Methods for Cooperation Support in Civil Engineering Applications on Example of Fire Protection Engineering. In: Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction. ( Scholar
  17. Rüppel U, Lange M, Wagenknecht A (2006b) Semantic Integration of Product Model Data in Fire Protection Engineering. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Product and Process Modelling (ECPPM), e-Business and e-work in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. Rüppel U, Theiß M, Lange M (2005) Agent-enabled Model Integration in a Knowledgebased Environment. In Scherer, R. J.; Katranuschkov, P.; Schapke, S.-E. (ed.), The CIB W78 22 nd Conference on Information Technology in Construction, Dresden, July 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Schneider U, Lebeda C (2000) Baulicher Brandschutz. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Lange
    • 1
  • U Rüppel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Numerical Methods and Informatics in Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and GeodesyDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations