Advertisement

Activity Diagram Based Process Family Architectures for Enterprise Application Families

  • Arnd Schnieders
  • Mathias Weske

Keywords

Process Family Engineering Business Process Variability Process Configuration Software Product Lines Variability Mechanisms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  1. [1].
    Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  2. [2].
    Puhlmann, F., Richter, E., Schnieders, A., Weiland: Variability Mechanisms for Process Models. PESOA-Report No. 17/2005. Technical report, Daimler-Chrysler Research and Technology, Hasso-Plattner-Institute for IT Systems Engineering (June 2005)Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    Schnieders, A.: Variability Mechanism Centric Process Family Architectures. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems ECBS 2006 (to appear), IEEE Computer Society Press (2006)Google Scholar
  4. [4].
    OMG: UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. (2003)Google Scholar
  5. [5].
    Pender, T.: UML Bible. Wiley Publishing Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana (2003)Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software Product-line Engineering: a Family-based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  7. [7].
    Gomaa, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML: From Use Cases to Pattern-based Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley Professional (2005)Google Scholar
  8. [8].
    Gomaa, H., Webber, D.: Modeling Adaptive and Evolvable Software Product Lines Using the Variation Point Model. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press (2004)Google Scholar
  9. [9].
    Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley (2001)Google Scholar
  10. [10].
    Bosch, J.: Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England et al. (2000)Google Scholar
  11. [11].
    Jacobson, I., Griss, M., Jonsson, P.: Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, England et al. (1997)Google Scholar
  12. [12].
    Svahnberg, M., Bosch, J.: Issues Concerning Variability in Software Product Lines. Volume June of 146. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2003)Google Scholar
  13. [13].
    Bachmann, F., Bass, L.: Managing Variability in Software Architectures. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Software Reusability, ACM Press (2001)Google Scholar
  14. [14].
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns — Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley (1995)Google Scholar
  15. [15].
    Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Activity Diagram Inheritance. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems BIS. (2005)Google Scholar
  16. [16].
    Plötner, D., Kose, M., Hering, T., Werner, A.: Prozesse im E-Business am Beispiel ausgewählter Geschäftsprozesse des Partners ehotel AG. PESOA-Report No. 20/2005. Technical report, ehotel AG, Universität Leipzig (June 2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnd Schnieders
    • 1
  • Mathias Weske
    • 1
  1. 1.Hasso-Plattner-Institute for IT Systems EngineeringUniversity PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations