Advertisement

Robotic Surgical Systems

  • Vimal K. Narula
  • W. Scott Melvin

Abstract

Surgery has evolved from the 19th century through the introduction of ether anesthesia, principles of antisepsis, and the formalization of surgical training.1 In the late 20th century, the introduction of laparoscopy and robotics has continued to evolve the practice of surgery. The computer revolution has affected all of our lives. Computers affect the surgeon’s interaction with the patient and the mechanics of tissue manipulation.2 At present time, a multitude of devices are available to assist, to interact, and to perform tasks in concert with the surgeon to complete the operation. The computer revolution compliments, and has added to, the development of robotic technology. This chapter will review the development of robotic surgical systems and instrumentation, the benefits they offer over conventional laparoscopic surgery, and the future of robotic technology.

Keywords

Robotic Surgery Laparoscopic Colectomy Heller Myotomy Leave Internal Mammary Artery Robotic Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Halstead WS. The training of the surgeon. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull 1904;15:267–275.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazey JW, Melvin WS. Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004;11(2):107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided sterotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988;35:153–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2000;214:129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickman JEA. A surgeon robot prostectomy—a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 1989;13:273–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J, et al. Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:784–795.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer A, Borner M, Lahmer A. Clinical experience with a medical robotic system for total hip replacement. In: Nolte LP, Ganz R, eds. Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999:128–133.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telemonitoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389–1402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sackier JM, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery: from concept to development. Surg Endosc 1994;8:63–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 1997;11:54–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johanet H. Voice-controlled robot: new surgical aide? Thought of a user. Ann Chir 1998;52:918–921.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, et al. Laparoscopic visual field: voice vs pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1415–1418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams J, Partin AW. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 1995;154:2134–2136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kondraske GV, Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, et al. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1523–1527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1995;181:552–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams J, Partin AW. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 1995;154:2134–2136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice controlled optic hold AESOP) in gynecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 1998;3: 2748–2750.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geis WP, Kim HC, Brennan EJ Jr, McAfee PC, Wang Y. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgery procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996; 29:471–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hubens G, Ysebaert D, Vaneerdewerg W, Chapelle T, Eyskens E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot. Acta Chir Belg 1999;99:125–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M, et al. Laparoscopic robot assisted adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 1999;51: 456–466.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, Wasielewski A. Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 2001;7:405–412.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telemonitoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389–1402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rininsland HH. Basics of robotics and manipulators in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1993;1: 154–159.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jensen JH, Hill JW. Advanced telepresence surgery system development. Stud Health Technol Inform 1996;29:107–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Green PE, Piantanida TA, Hill JW, Simon IB, Satava RM. Telepresence: dexterous procedures in a virtual operating field [abstract]. Am Surg 1991;57:192.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telemonitoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389–1402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marescaux J, Rubino F. The ZEUS® robotic system: experimental clinical applications. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kiaii B, Boyd WD, Rayman R, et al. Robot assisted computer enhanced closed chest coronary surgery: preliminary experience using a harmonic scalpel and Zeus®. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:194–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyd WD, Kiaii B, Novick RJ, et al. RAVECAB: improving outcome in off pump minimal access surgery with robotic assistance and video enhancement. Can J Surg 2001;44:45–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gulbins H, Boehn DH, Reichenspurner H, Arnold M, Ellgass R. 3D visualization improves the dry lab coronary anastomosis using the Zeus® robotic system. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:318–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tabaie HA, Reinbolt JA, Graper WP, Kelly TF, Connor MA. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft (ECABG) procedure with robotic assistance. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:310–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, et al. Use of voice controlled and computer assisted surgical system ZEUS® for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:11–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boehn DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, et al. Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68: 1542–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boehn DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, et al. Clinical use of a computer enhanced surgical robotic system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kappert U, Cichon R, Guiliemos V, et al. Robotic enhanced Dresden technique for minimally invasive bilateral mammary artery grafting. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:319–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carpentier A, Louimel D, Aupacie B, Berrebi A, Reiland J. Computer assisted cardiac surgery [letter]. Lancet 1999;353:379–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegler A, et al. Computer enhanced “robotic” cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121: 842–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Autschbach R, Onnasch JF, Falk V, et al. The Leipzig experience with robotic surgery. J Card Surg2000;15:82–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW. Minimally invasive videoscopic mitral valve surgery: the current role of surgical robots. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2000;15:61–75.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Himpens J, Leman G, Cardiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy [letter]. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cardiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Faveretti F. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg 1999;9:206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cardiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Fourtanier G. Nissen fundoplication done by remotely controlled robotic technician. Ann Chir 1999;53:137–141.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cardiere GB, Himpens J. Nissen fundoplication with a robot. Osp Ital Chir 2001;7:385–392.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cardiere GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a feasibility study. Fert Steril 2000;74:1020–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, Kim VB, et al. Computer enhanced robotically assisted telemanipulative cholecytectomy [abstract]. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:S175.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Young JA, Chapman WHH, Albrecht RJ, et al. Initial patient series with robotic assisted Nissen fundoplication [abstract]. Surg Endosc 2001;15: S175.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer assisted “robotic” telesurgery: initial experience in foregut surgery [abstract]. Surg Endosc 2001;15:S148.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer assisted robotic Heller Myotomy: initial case report. J Laproendosc Adv Surg Tech 2001;11: 251–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cecconi S, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Clinical experience using robotics in a large community hospital. Osp Ital Chir 2001;7:379–384.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Gulbins H, et al. Early experience with robotic technology for coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68: 1542–1546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gyung TS, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus® systems. Urology 2001;58:893–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D, et al. Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health 2001;7:341–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:379–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57. National Aueronautics and Space Agency. NEEMO 7 project: Doctor 1300 miles away assists in underwater surgery. Available at: http://www.nasa. gov/vision/space/preparingtravel/underwatersurgery.html. Accessed April 15, 2006.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fabrizio MD, Lee BR, Chan DY, et al. Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation. J Endourol 2000;14:133–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59. ProMIS surgical simulator. Available at: http://www.haptica.com/idll.htm, Accessed April 15, 2006.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Narula VK, Watson W, Davis SS, et al. A new objective skills assessment system for telerobotic surgery [abstract]. First Worldwide MIRA Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vimal K. Narula
    • 1
  • W. Scott Melvin
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Minimally Invasive SurgeryThe Ohio Sate UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations