Use of Biotechnology to Increase Food Production and Nutritional Value

  • Scott P. Segal
  • Travis J. Knight
  • Donald C. Beitz
Chapter
Part of the Nutrition and Health book series (NH)

Abstract

The term biotechnology is often used synonymously with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture to produce plants and animals that will either increase the efficiency of food production or increase the nutritional content. Biotechnology uses a number of different genetic tools, beyond modification, including the use of antisense technology, and the exogenous synthesis of important enzymes. This chapter describes the use of biotechnology by the food industry with its main focus towards genetic modification, although other forms of biotechnology will also be described.

Keywords

Biotechnology Genetically modified organisms Food safety Genetically modified plants Genetically modified animals Food production 

References

  1. 1.
    Madden D. Food biotechnology: an introduction. Washington, DC: ILSI; 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Research Council and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Safety of genetically engineered foods—approaches to assessing unintended health effects. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science; 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foods D. Animal product options in the marketplace. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helm RM. Food biotechnology: is this good or bad? Implication to allergic disease. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;90:90–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chong M. Acceptance of golden rice in the Philippine ‘rice bowl’. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:971–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huffman WE, Rousu M, Shogren JF, Tegene A. Controversies over the adoption of genetically modified organisms. J Agric Food Ind Organ. 2004;2(8).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein TM, Fromm M, Weissinger A, Tomes D, Schaaf S, Sletten M, Sanford JC. Transfer of foreign genes into intact maize cells with high-velocity microprojectiles. PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 1988;85:4305–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein TM, Harper EC, Svab Z, Sanford JC, Fromm ME, Maliga P. Stable genetic transformation of intact Nicotiana cells by the particle bombardment process. PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 1988;85:8502–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bevan M. Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:8711–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birch RG. Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Bio. 1997;48:297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of T-DNA. The Plant J. 1994;6:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng XY, Sardana R, Kaplan H, Altosaar I. Agrobacterium-transformed rice expressing synthetic cry1ab and cry1ac genes are highly toxic to striped stem borer and yellow stem borer. PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 1998;95:2767–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mayz L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature Biotechnol. 1996;4:745–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de la Riva GA, Gonzalez-Cabrera J, Vazquez-Padron R, Ayra-Parda C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens: a natural tool for plant transformation. Electronic J Biochem. 1998;1:118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruane J, Sonnino A. Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries and their possible contribution to food security. J Biotechnol. 2011;156(4):356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malik J, Barry G, Kishore G. The herbicide glyphosate. Biofactors. 1998;2:17–25.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Padgette SR, Kolacz KH, Delannay X, et al. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosphate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 1995;35:1461–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brooks G, Barfoot P. Global impact of biotech crops: socio-economic and environmental effect in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum. 2006;9:139–51.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lynch RE. European corn borer: yield losses in relation to hybrid and stage of corn development. J Econ Entomol. 1980;73:159–64.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qiam M, Zilberman D. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science. 2003;299:900–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor N, Chavarriaga P, Raemakers K, Siritunga D, Zhang P. Development and application of transgenic technologies in cassava. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56:671–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DellaPenna D. Nutritional genomics: Manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health. Science. 1999;285:375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Forkmann G, Martens S. Metabolic engineering and applications of flavonoids. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001;12:155–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I. Engineering of provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Science. 2000;287:303–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dixon R, Steele C. Flavonoids and isoflavonoids—a gold mine for metabolic engineering. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4:394–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lucca P, Hurrell R, Potrykus I. Genetic engineering to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102:392–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norris SR, Shen X, DellaPenna D. Complementation of the Arabidopsis pds1 mutation with the gene encoding p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Plant Physiol. 1998;117:1317–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baldet P, Alban C, Douce R. Biotin synthesis in higher plants: purification and characterization of bioB gene product equivalent from Arabidopsis thaliana overexpressed in Escherichia coli and its subcellular localization in pea leaf cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;419:206–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Belanger FC, Leustek T, Chu B, Kriz AL. Evidence for the thiamine biosynthetic pathway in higher-plant plastids and its developmental regulation. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;29:809–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gura T. New genes boost rice nutrients Science. 1999;285:994–5.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burkhardt P, Beyer P, Wunn J, et al. Transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) endosperm expressing daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus) phytoene synthase accumulates phytoene, a key intermediate of provitamin a biosynthesis. The Plant J. 1997;11:1071–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dobson R. Royalty-free licenses for genetically modified rice made available to developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:1281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hellewege E, Czapla S, Jahnke A, Willmitzer L, Heyer A. Transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers synthesize the full spectrum of inulin molecules naturally occurring in globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:8699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. Bioengineering nitrogen acquisition in rice: can novel initiatives in rice genomics and physiology contribute to global food security? BioEssays. 2004;26:683–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moffatt AS. Engineering plants to cope with metals. Science. 1999;285:369–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Capell T, Bassie L, Christou P. Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 2004;101:9909–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hodges K, Gill R. Infectious diarrhea cellular and molecular mechanisms. Gut Microbes. 2010;1:4–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hidetoshi S, Pokorny J. The development and application of novel vegetable oils tailor-made for specific human dietary needs. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2003;105:769–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Broun P, Gettner S, Somerville C. Genetic engineering of plant lipids. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:197–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hitz WD, Yadav NS, Reiter RS, Mauvais CJ, Kinney AJ. Reducing polyunsaturation in oils of transgenic canola and soybean. In: Kader J, Mazliak P, editors. Plant lipid metabolism. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1995. p. 506–8.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wheeler M. Production of transgenic livestock: promise fulfilled. J Animal Sci. 2003;81 Suppl 3:32–7.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hammer RE, Pursel VG, et al. Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep, and pigs by microinjection. Nature. 1985;315:680–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilmut I. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997;385:810–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wilmut I, Schnieke E, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Colman A, Campbell KHS. Nuclear transfer in the production of transgenic farm animals. New York: CABI; 1999.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilmut I, Schnieke A, McWhir J, Kind A, Campbell K. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997;385:810–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faber DC, Molina JA, Ohlrichs CL, Vander Zwaag DF, Ferre LB. Commercialization of animal biotechnology. Theriogenology. 2003;59:125–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on a National Strategy for Biotechnology in Agriculture. Agricultural biotechnology: strategies for national competitiveness. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schnieke AE. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei form transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science. 1997;278:2130–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Russell JB, Wilson DB. Potential opportunities and problems for genetically altered rumen microorganisms. J Nutr. 1988;118:274–9.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lazarev VN, Stipkovits L, Biro J, et al. Induced expression of the antimicrobial peptide melittin inhibits experimental infection by Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chickens. Microbes Infect. 2004;6:536–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nandiwada LS, Schamberger GP, Schafer HW, Diez-Gonzalez F. Characterisation of an E2-type colicin and its application to treat alfalfa seeds to reduce Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;93:267–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Swaggerty D, Walling A, Klein R. Lactose intolerance. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65:1845–60.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jost B, Vilotte JL, Duluc I, Rodeau JL, Freund JN. Production of low-lactose milk by ectopic expression of intestinal lactase in the mouse mammary gland. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:180–4.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Baguisi A. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:456–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bauman DE, Eppard PJ, DeGeeter MJ, Lanza GM. Response of high producing dairy cows to long-term treatment with pituitary somatotropin and recombinant somatotropin. J Dairy Sci 1985; 1352–62.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bauman DE, Everett RW, Weiland WH, Collier RJ. Production responses to bovine somatotropin in Northeast dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2564–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    McGuffy RK, Green HB, Easson RP, Ferguson TH. Lactation response of dairy cows receiving bovine somatotropin via daily injections or in a sustained-release vehicle. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73:763–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Soderholm CG, Otterby DE, Ehle FR, Linn JG, Hansen WR, Annerstad RJ. Effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin on milk production, body composition, and physiological parameters. J Dairy Sci. 1988;71:355–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Juskevich JC, Guyer CG. Bovine growth hormone: human food safety evaluation. Science. 1990;249:875–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Etherton TD, Wiggins JP, Chung CS, Evock CM, Rebhun JF, Walton PE. Stimulation of pig growth performance by porcine somatotropin and growth hormone releasing factor. J Anim Sci. 1986;63:1389–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Petty J. The rapid emergence of genetic modification in world agriculture: contested risks and benefits. Environ Conserv. 2001;28:248–62.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Poppy G. GM crops: environmental risks and non-target effects. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:4–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F. Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysolperla carnea. Environmen Entomology. 1998;27:480–7.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Birch ANE, Geoghegan IE, Majerus MEN, McNicol JW, Hackett CA, Gatehouse AMR, Gatehouse JA. Tri-trophic interactions involving pest aphids, predatory 2-spot ladybirds and transgenic potatoes expressing snowdrop lectin for aphid resistance. Molecular Breeding. 1999;5:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Eghball B, Gilley JE, Baltensperger DD, Blumenthal JM. Long-term manure and fertilizer application effects on phosphorus and nitrogen in runoff. Transactions ASAE. 2002;45:687–94.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science. 2008;321:926–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT. Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science. 2002;296:2386–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Millstone E, Brunner E. Mayer S. Beyond substantial equivalence Nature. 1999;401:525–6.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    van der Voet H, Perry J, Paoletti C. A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties. BMC Biotech. 2011;11:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rischer H, Oksman-Caldentey K. Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics? Trends Biotech. 2006;3:102–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jenkins H, Hardy N, Beckmann M, et al. A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results. Nature Biotech. 2004;22:1601–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Davies H, Shepherd LV, Steward D, Frank T, Rohlig R, Engel K. Metabolome variability in crop plant species-when, where, how much and so what? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010;58(3 Suppl):S54–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hug K. Genetically modified organisms: do the benefits outweigh the risks? Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44:87–99.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Committee on Identifying and Assessing Unintended Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods on Human Health, Board of Life Sciences, Food and Nutrition Board, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of the National Academies. Safety of genetically engineered foods; approaches to assessing unintended health effects. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    James D, Schmidt AM, Wall E, Green M, Masri S. Reliable detection and identification of genetically modified maize, soybean, and canola by multiplex PCR analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:5829–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Miraglia M, Berdal KG, Brera C, et al. Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42:1157–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jorgensen RB. The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature. 1996;380:31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Chevre AM, Eber F, Baranger A, Renard M. Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature. 1997;389:924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    De Vries J, Wackernagel W. Detection of nptII (kanamycin resistance) in genomes of transgenic plants by marker-rescue transformation. Mol Gen Genetics. 1998;257:606–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    van den Eede G, Aarts H, Buhk H, et al. The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42:1127–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott P. Segal
    • 1
  • Travis J. Knight
    • 2
  • Donald C. Beitz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWinona State UniversityWinonaUSA
  2. 2.Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land StewardshipAnkenyUSA
  3. 3.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations