Advertisement

The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

  • Jonathan ShedlerEmail author
Part of the Current Clinical Psychiatry book series (CCPSY)

Abstract

Empirical evidence supports the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Effect sizes for psychodynamic psychotherapy are as large as those reported for other therapies that have been actively promoted as “empirically supported” and “evidence based.” Additionally, patients who receive psychodynamic therapy maintain therapeutic gains and appear to continue to improve after treatment ends. Finally, nonpsychodynamic therapies may be effective in part because the more skilled practitioners utilize techniques that have long been central to psychodynamic theory and practice. The perception that psychodynamic approaches lack empirical support does not accord with available scientific evidence and may reflect selective dissemination of research findings.

Keywords

Meta-analysis psychoanalysis psychodynamic psychotherapy psychotherapy ­outcome psychotherapy process 

References

  1. 1.
    Freud S. Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud 1917;16:241–463.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bornstein R. Psychoanalysis in the undergraduate curriculum: the treatment of psychoanalytic theory in abnormal psychology texts. Psychoanal Psychol. 1988;5:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bornstein R. Psychoanalysis in the undergraduate curriculum: an agenda for the psychoanalytic researcher. Accessed in 2010. Electronic publishing: http://www.columbia.edu/∼hc137/prs/v4n1/v4n1!2.htm, 1995.
  4. 4.
    Hansell J. Writing an undergraduate textbook: an analyst’s strange journey. Psychologist-Psychoanalyst. 2005;24(4):37–8. Electronic publishing: http://www.division39.org/pdfs/PsychPsychoanalyst1004c.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Redmond J, Shulman M. Access to psychoanalytic ideas in American undergraduate institutions. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2008;56:391–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blagys MD, Hilsenroth MJ. Distinctive activities of short-term psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy: a review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2000;7:167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shedler J. Why the scientist-practitioner schism won’t go away. The General Psychologist. 2006;41(2):9–10. Electronic publishing: http://www.apa.org/divisions/div1/archive.html.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McWilliams N. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy: a practitioner’s guide. NY: Guilford; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gabbard GO. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a basic text. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blagys MD, Hilsenroth MJ. Distinctive activities of cognitive–behavioral therapy: a review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22:671–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burum BA, Goldfried MR. The centrality of emotion to psychological change. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2007; 14:407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shedler J. That was then, this is now: psychoanalytic psychotherapy for the rest of us. Accessed in 2010. Electronic publishing: http://psychsystems.net/shedler.html, 2005.
  13. 13.
    Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenthal R, DiMatteo MR. Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:59–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL. Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith ML, Glass GV, Miller TI. The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: confirmation from meta-analysis. Am Psychol. 1993;48:1181–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson LA, Berman JS, Neimeyer RA. Psychotherapy for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review of controlled outcome research. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:30–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In: Lambert M, editor. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th ed. NY: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:252–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hedges LV. Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychol Bull. 1982;92:490–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moncrieff J, Wessely S, Hardy R. Active placebos versus antidepressants for depression (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD003012.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meyer GJ, Finn SE, Eyde LD, Kay GG, Moreland KL, Dies RR, Eisman EJ, Kubiszyn TW, Reed GM. Psychological testing and psychological assessment: a review of evidence and issues. Am Psychol. 2001; 56:128–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abbass AA, Hancock JT, Henderson J, Kisely S. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD004687.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leichsenring F, Rabung S, Leibing E. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:1208–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abbass A, Kisely S, Kroenke K. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78:265–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leichsenring F, Leibing E. The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1223–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Messer SB, Abbass AA. Evidence-based psychodynamic therapy with personality disorders. In: J. Magnavita, editor. Evidence-based treatment of personality dysfunction: principles, methods and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300:1551–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy reply. J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:932–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Maat S, de Jonghe F, Schoevers R, Dekker J. The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: a systematic review of empirical studies. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(1):1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson EM, Lambert MJ. Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: a review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 1995;15:503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gloaguen V, Cottraux J, Cucherat M, Blackburn I. A metaanalysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients. J Affect Disord. 1998;49:59–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ, Shelton RC, et al. Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:417–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maat S, Dekker J, Schoevers R, de Jonghe F. Relative efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression: a meta-analysis. Psychother Res. 2006;16:562–72.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Westen D, Novotny CM, Thompson-Brenner H. The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychol Bull. 2004;130:631–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leichsenring F. Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? Int J Psychoanal. 2005;86: 841–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Milrod B, Leon AC, Busch ZF, Rudden M, Schwalberg M, Clarkin J, Aronson A, Singer M, Turchin W, Klass ET, et al. A randomized control trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for panic disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164:265–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Clarkin JF, Levy KN, Lenzenweger MF, Kernberg OF. Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:922–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Linehan MM. Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford; 1993.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Levy KN, Meehan KB, Kelly KM, Reynoso JS, Weber M, Clarkin JF, Kernberg OF. Change in attachment ­patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1027–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bateman A, Fonagy P. 8-year follow-up of patients treated tor borderline personality disorder: mentalization-based treatment versus treatment as usual. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:631–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Blatt SJ, Zuroff DC. Empirical evaluation of the assumptions in identifying evidence based treatments in mental health. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25:459–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Westen D, Gabbard G, Blagov P. Back to the future: personality structure as a context for psychopathology. In: Krueger RF, Tackett JL, editors. Personality and psychopathology. New York: Guilford; 2006. p. 335–84.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G, van Oppen P. Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76:909–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leichsenring F. Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression: a meta-analytic approach. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:401–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:1–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Elkin I, Shea T, Watkins JT, Imber SD, Sotsky SM, Collins JF, Glass DR, Pilkonis PA, Leber WR, Docherty JP, Fiester SJ, Parloff MB. National institutes of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:971–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ablon JS, Jones EE. Validity of controlled clinical trials of psychotherapy: findings from the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:775–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Goldfried MR, Wolfe BE. Psychotherapy practice and research: repairing a strained alliance. Am Psychol. 1996;51:1007–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kazdin AE. Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. Am Psychol. 2008;63:146–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jones EE. Therapeutic action: a guide to psychoanalytic therapy. Northvale: Jason Aronson; 2000.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ablon JS, Jones EE. How expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Psychother Res. 1998;8:71–83.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jones EE, Pulos SM. Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive behavioral therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:306–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Castonguay LG, Goldfried MR, Wiser SL, Raue PJ, Hayes AM. Predicting the effect of cognitive therapy for depression: a study of unique and common factors. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emory G. Cognitive therapy of depression. NY: Guilford; 1979.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ, Evans MD, Wiemer MJ, Garvey MJ, Grove MW, Tuasn VB. Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression: singly and in combination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:774–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Greenson RR. The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press; 1967.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Horvath AO, Luborsky L. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 61:561–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Freud S. Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. 1896;3:157–185.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hayes AM, Castonguay LG, Goldfried MR. Effectiveness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:623–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Feeley M, DeRubeis RJ, Gelfand LA. The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:578–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Strunk DR, DeRubeis RJ, Chiu AW, Alvarez J. Patients’ competence in and performance of cognitive therapy skills: relation to the reduction of relapse risk following treatment for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75:523–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tang T, DeRubeis R. Sudden gains and critical session in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:894–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Barber J, Crits-Christoph P, Luborsky L. Effects of therapist adherence and competence on patient outcome in brief dynamic therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:619–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Diener MJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Weinberger J. Therapist affect focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:936–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gaston L, Thompson L, Gallagher D, Cournoyer L, Gagnon R. Alliance, technique, and their interactions in predicting outcome of behavioral, cognitive, and brief dynamic therapy. Psychother Res. 1998;8:190–209.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hayes A, Strauss J. Dynamic systems theory as a paradigm for the study of cognitive change in psychotherapy: an application of cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:939–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hilsenroth M, Ackerman S, Blagys M, Baity M, Mooney M. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: an evaluation of statistical, clinically significant, and technique specific change. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003;191:349–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Høglend P, Bøgwald KP, Amlo S, Marble A, Ulberg R, et al. Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: do they really yield sustained effects? Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:763–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Pos AE, Greenberg LS, Goldman RN, Korman LM. Emotional processing during experiential treatment of depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:1007–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vocisano C, Klein DN, Arnow B, Rivera C, Blalock JA, Rothbaum B, Vivian D, Markowitz JC, Kocsis JH, Manber R, Castonguay L, Rush AJ, Borian F, McCullough JP, Kornstein SG, Riso LP, Thase ME. Therapist variables that predict change in psychotherapy with chronically depressed outpatients. Psychotherapy. 2004;41: 255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rosenzweig S. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1936;6:412–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Luborsky L, Singer B, Luborsky L. Comparative studies of psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32: 995–1008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Luborsky L, Diguer L, Seligman DA, Rosenthal R, Krause ED, Johnson S, Halperin G, Bishop M, Berman JS, Schweizer E. The researcher’s own therapy allegiances: a “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 1999;6:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wampold BE, Minami T, Baskin TW, Callen ST. A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus “other therapies” for depression. J Affect Disord. 2002;68:159–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated treatments: report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist. 1995;48:3–23.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Chambless DL, Baker M, Baucom DH, Beutler LE, Calhoun KS, et al. Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist. 1998;51:3–16.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Barkham M, Rees A, Shapiro DA, Stiles WB, Agnew RM, Halstead J, Culverwell A, Harrington VMG. Outcomes of time-limited psychotherapy in applied settings: replication of the second Sheffield psychotherapy project. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:1079–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shapiro DA, Barkham M, Rees A, Hardy GE, Reynolds S, Startup M. Effects of treatment duration and severity of depression on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:522–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Norcross JC, Beutler LE, Levant RF, editors. Evidence based practices in mental health: debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hamilton MA. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Blatt SJ, Auerbach JS. Psychodynamic measures of therapeutic change. Psychoanal Inq. 2003;23:268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shedler J, Westen D. The Shedler–Westen assessment procedure (SWAP): making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful. J Pers Assess. 2007;89:41–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing axis II, part 1: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:258–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing axis II, part 2: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:273–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Westen D, Shedler J. Personality diagnosis with the Shedler–Westen assessment procedure (SWAP): integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:810–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Lingiardi V, Shedler J, Gazillo F. Assessing personality change in psychotherapy with the SWAP-200: a case study. J Pers Assess. 2006;86:23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Cogan R, Porcerelli JH. Clinician reports of personality pathology of patients beginning and patients ending psychoanalysis. Psychol Psychother Theor Res Pract. 2005;78(2):235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Norcross JC. The psychotherapist’s own psychotherapy: educating and developing psychologists. Am Psychol. 2005;60:840–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Westen D. The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychol Bull. 1998;124:333–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Barlow DH, Durand VM. Abnormal psychology: an integrative approach. 4th ed. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 2005.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Crews F. The verdict on Freud. Psychol Sci. 1996;7:63–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kihlstrom JF. A tumbling ground for whimsies? Contem Psychol. 1999;44:376–8.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Bornstein R. The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Psychol. 2001;18:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Westen D, Novotny CM, Thompson-Brenner H. EBP ≠ EST: Reply to Crits-Christoph et al. (2005) and Weisz et al. (2005). Psychol Bull. 131:427–433.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Haby MM, Donnely M, Corry J, Vos T. Cognitive behavioural therapy for depression, panic disorder and ­generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-regression of factors that may predict outcome. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40:9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Churchill R, Hunot V, Corney R, Knapp M, McGuire H, Tylee A, Wessely S. A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007;27:318–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Öst LG. Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46:296–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations