Advertisement

Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy

Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches
  • Kevin C. Zorn
  • Arieh L. Shalhav
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

Seventeen years after the first reported laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1990 by Clayman et al. (1) and over a decade since the first retroperitoneal approach using a dissecting balloon by Gaur et al. (2) minimally invasive approaches to renal pathology continue to prove as an effective alternative to traditional open nephrectomy. Wide dissemination of these surgical techniques and continued improvement in instrumentation has made laparoscopy the preferred approach for treating benign pathologic conditions of the kidney.

Keywords

Renal Artery Renal Vein Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Psoas Muscle Retroperitoneal Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991, 146: 278–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1993, 149:103–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liao JC, Breda A, Schulam PG. Laparoscopic Renal surgery for benign disease. Curr Urol Rep 2007, 8:12–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doehn C, Fornara P, Fricke L, Jocham D. Comparison of laparoscopic and open nephroureterectomy for benign disease. J Urol 1998, 159:732–734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doublet JD, Barreto HS, Degremont AC, et al. Retroperitoneal nephrectomy: Comparison of laparoscopy with open surgery. World J Surg 1996, 20:713–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta NP, Goel R, Hemal AK et al. Should retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy be the standard of care for benign nonfunctioning kidneys? An outcome analysis based on experience with 449 cases in a 5-year period. J Urol 2004, 172:1411–1413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, et al. Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: A comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology 1994, 43:607–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 1996, 10:45–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parra RO, Perez MG, Boullier JA, Cummings JM. Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol 1995, 153:1171–1173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, et al. Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 1998, 33:489–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Traxer O, Pearle MS. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease. Semin Laparosc Surg 2000, 7:176–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donovan JF, Cooper CS, Lund GO, Winfield HN. Laparoscopic nephrectomy of a horseshoe kidney. J Endourol 1997, 11:181–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saggar VR, Singh K, Sarangi R. Retroperitoneoscopic heminephrectomy of a horseshoe kidney for calculus disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004, 14:172–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yohannes P, Dinlenc C, Liatsikos E, et al. Laparoscopic heminephrectomy for benign disease of the horseshoe kidney. Jsls 2002, 6:381–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gupta N, Mandhani A, Sharma D, et al. Is laparoscopic approach safe for ectopic pelvic kidneys? Urol Int 2006, 77:118–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Loffer FD Pent D. Laparoscopy in the obese patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976, 125: 104–107.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winfield HN, Donovan JF, See WA, Loening SA, Williams RD. Urological laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 1991, 146: 941–948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fazeli-Matin S, Gill IS, Hsu TH, et al. Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in obese patients: Comparison to open surgery. J Urol 1999, 162:665–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Doublet J Belair G. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective in obese patients: A comparative study of 55 procedures. Urology 2000, 56: 63–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anast JW, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al.: Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy. J Urol 2004, 172:2287–2291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Marberger M: Benefits of laparoscopic renal surgery are more pronounced in patients with a high body mass index. Eur Urol 2003, 43:522–527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Bartlett ST, Flowers JL, Jarrell B. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in the markedly obese living renal donor. Urology 2000: 56: 926–929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keeley FX, Tolley DA: A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: Defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol 1998, 82:615–618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shekarriz B, Meng MV, Lu HF, et al.: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions. J Urol 2001, 166:2091–2094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manohar T, Desai M, Desai M. Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory conditions. J Endourol 2007, 21:1323–1328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: A multi-institutional review. J Urol 1995, 154: 479–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kabalin JN. Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneum, kidneys, and ureters. In: Campbell’s Urology vol. 1. (Wein AJ, ed.), W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1998, pp 49–88.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leder RA Nelson RC. Three-dimensional CT of the genitourinary tract. J Endourol 2001, 15: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar U, Albala DM. Simple nephrectomy: Transperitoneal approach. J Endourol 2000, 14: 779–785; discussion 785–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stifelman M, Andrade A, Sosa RE, Shichman S. Simple nephrectomy: Hand-assisted technique. J Endourol 2000, 10:793–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gaur DD. Simple nephrectomy: Retroperitoneal approach. J Endourol. 2000, 10:787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tan YH, Siddiqui K, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions. J Endourol 2004, 18:770–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kessler BD, Shichman SJ. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Hand-assisted. In Essential urologic laparoscopy: The complete clinical guide. Edited by Nakada SY. Totowa: Humana Press; 2003:143–156.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Albala DM, Kavoussi LR Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. Semin Urol 1992, 10: 146–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW. Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001, 192: 677–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Helal M, Albertini J, Lockhart J, Albrink M. Laparoscopic nephrectomy using the harmonic scalpel. J Endourol 1997, 11: 267–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Potter SR, Kavoussi LR, Jackman SV. Management of diaphragmatic injury during laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2001, 165: 1203–1204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Msezane LP, Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Schade GR, Shalhav AL. Conservative Management of a Large Capnothorax following Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: A Case Report. J Endourol 2007, 21: 1445–1447.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rapp DE, Orvieto MA, Gerber GS, Johnston WK 3rd, Wolf JS, Shalhav AL. En bloc stapling of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. Urology 2004, 64:655–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    White WM, Klein FA, Gash J, Waters WB. Prospective radiographic follow-up after en bloc ligation of the renal hilum. J Urol 2007, 178:1888–1891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: Early recognition and management. J Urol 2000, 164: 319–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schuster TG, Wolf JS, Jr. Use of bipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2001, 165: 1968–1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Orvieto M, Chien GW, Harland R, Garfinkel MR, Galocy M, Shalhav AL. Bipolar electrocoagulation for clipless division of left renal vein branches during laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc. 2004, 36: 2625–2627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baughman SM, Bishoff JT. Novel direct-vision renal morcellation with orthopedic rotary shaver-blade instrumentation. J Endourol 2005, 19:86–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Varkarakis JM, McAllister M, Ong AM, Solomon SB, Allaf ME, Inagaki T, Bhayani SB, Trock B, Jarrett TW. Evaluation of water jet morcellation as an alternative to hand morcellation of renal tissue during laparoscopic nephrectomy: An in vitro study.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Varkarakis I, Rha K, Hernandez F, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic specimen extraction: Morcellation. BJU Int 2005, 95 Suppl 2:27–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kerbl K, Figenshau RS, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Kavoussi LR, Albala DM, Stone AM. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Laboratory and clinical experience. J Endourol 1993, 7: 23–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy: Use of a new device. J Urol 1992, 148: 1137–1139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am 1998, 25: 343–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pearle MS, Nakada SY. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Retroperitoneal approach. Semin Laparosc Surg 1996, 3: 75–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chiu AW, Chen KK, Wang JH, Huang WJ, Chang LS. Direct needle insuffl ation for pneumoretroperitoneum: Anatomic confirmation and clinical experience. Urology 1995, 46: 432–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gill IS, Rassweiler JJ. Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: Our approach. Urology 1999, 54: 734–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hsu TH, Sung GT, Gill IS. Retroperitoneoscopic approach to nephrectomy. J Endourol 1999, 13: 713–718; discussion 718–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gill IS, Grune MT, Munch LC. Access technique for retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 1996, 156:1120–1124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Capelouto CC, Moore RG, Silverman SG, Kavoussi LR. Retro peritoneoscopy: Anatomical rationale for direct retroperitoneal access. J Urol 1994, 152: 2008–2010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Anhalt MA, Cawood CD, Scott R, Jr. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: A comprehensive review with report of 4 additional cases. J Urol 1971, 105: 10–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Petronic V, Buturovic J, Isvaneski M. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Br J Urol 1989, 64: 336–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chuang CK, Lai MK, Chang PL, Huang MH, Chu SH, Wu CJ, Wu HR. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: Experience in 36 cases. J Urol 1992, 147: 333–336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Eastham J, Ahlering T, Skinner E. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: Clinical fi ndings and surgical considerations. Urology 1994, 43: 295–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tolia BM, Newman HR, Fruchtman B, Bekirov H, Freed SZ. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: Segmental or generalized disease. J Urol 1980, 124: 122–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Malek RS, Greene LF, DeWeerd JH, Farrow GM. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Br J Urol 1972, 44: 296–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tolia BM, Iloreta A, Freed SZ, Fruchtman B, Bennett B, Newman HR. Xanthogranulomatouspyelonephritis: Detailed analysis of 29 cases and a brief discussion of atypical presentations. J Urol 1981, 126: 437–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nataluk EA, McCullough DL, Scharling EO. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, the gatekeeper’sdilemma: A contemporary look at an old problem. Urology 1995, 45: 377–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Anderson KR. Simple nephrectomy: Managing the difficult case: Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol 2000,10:799–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bercowsky E, Shalhav AL, Portis A, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Is the laparoscopicapproach justified in patients with xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis? Urology 1999, 54: 437–442; discussion 442–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Khaira HS, Shah RB, Wolf JS. Laparoscopic and open surgical nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. J Endourol 2005,19:813–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Davis SD, Yankelevitz DF, Williams T, Henschke CI. Pulmonary tuberculosis in immunocomprimised hosts: Epidemiological, clinical, and radiological assessment. Semin Roentgenol 1993, 28:119–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Harisinghani MG, McLoud TC, Shepard JO, Ko JP, Shroff MM, Mueller PR. Tuberculosis from head to toe. Radiographics 2000, 20:449–470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Premkumar A, Lattimer J, Newhouse JH. CT and sonography of advanced urinary tract tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987, 148:65–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ. CT features of genitourinary tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997, 21:254–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Brennan RE, Pollack HM. Nonvisualized (“phantom”) renal calyx: Causes and radiological approach to diagnosis. Urol Radiol 1979, 21:163–170.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Skutil V, Gow JG. Urogenital tuberculosis: The present state in Europe-the report of round table discussion. Eur Urol 1977, 3:257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gupta NP, Agrawal AK, Sood S. Tubercular pyelonephritic nonfunctioning kidney – another relative contraindication for laparoscopic nephrectomy: A case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997, 7: 131–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Flechner SM, Gow JG. Role of nephrectomy in the treatment of non-functioning or very poorly functioning unilateral tuberculous kidney. J Urol 1980, 123: 822–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kim HH, Lee KS, Park K, Ahn H. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for nonfunctioning tuberculous kidney. J Endourol, 2000, 14: 433–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Weber M, Janetschek G, Fahlenkamp D, Henkel T, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: The experience of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association. J Urol 1998, 160: 18–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hemal AK, Gupta NP, Kumar R. Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with open surgery for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys. J Urol 2000,164:32–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee KS, Kim HH, Byun SS, Kwak C, Park K, Ahn H. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculos nonfunctioning kidney: Comparison with laparoscopic simple nephrectomy for other diseases. Urology 2002, 60:411–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Arnaout MA. Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Annu Rev Med 2001, 52: 93–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wang D, Strandgaard S. The pathogenesis of hypertension in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Hypertens 1997, 15: 925–933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Steinman TI. Pain management in polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2000, 35: 770–772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bell PE, Hossack KF, Gabow PA, Durr JA, Johnson AM, Schrier RW. Hypertension in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int 1988, 34: 683–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Milutinovic J, Fialkow PJ, Agodoa LY, Phillips LA, Rudd TG, Sutherland S. Clinical manifestations of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in patients older than 50 years. Am J Kidney Dis 1990, 15: 237–243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gabow PA. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 1993, 329: 332–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    McNally ML, Erturk E, Oleyourryk G, Schoeniger L. Laparoscopic cyst decortication using the harmonic scalpel for symptomatic autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Endourol 2001, 15: 597–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, Jr., McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopy for adult polycystic kidney disease: A promising alternative. Am J Kidney Dis 1996, 27: 224–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hemal AK. Laparoscopic management of renal cystic disease. Urol Clin North Am 2001, 28:115–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bennett AH, Stewart W, Lazarus JM. Bilateral nephrectomy in patients with polycystic renal disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973, 137: 819–820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rayner BL, Cassidy MJ, Jacobsen JE, Pascoe MD, Pontin AR, van Zyl Smit R. Is preliminary binephrectomy necessary in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease undergoing renal transplantation? Clin Nephrol 1990. 34: 122–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Rothstein M, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with end-stage renal disease and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2000, 35: 720–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Elashry OM, Giusti G, Nadler RB, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Incisional hernia after laparoscopic nephrectomy with intact specimen removal: Caveat emptor. J Urol 1997, 158: 363–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Pace D, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Mamazza J. Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant polycystic kidneys: A case control study. Urology 2001, 58: 23–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: A multiinstitutional review. J Urol 1995, 154:479–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Matin SF, Abreu S, Ramani A, et al. Evaluation of age and comorbidity as risk factors after laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 2003, 170:1115–1120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Parsons JK, Varkarakis I, Rha KH, et al. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: Longitudinal five-year analysis. Urology 2004, 63:27–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Soulie M, Salomon L, Seguin P, et al.: Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology 2001, 58:899–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Soulie M, Seguin P, Richeux L, et al. Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: Experience with 350 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2001, 165:1960–1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, et al. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: Review of 1311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 2002, 168:23–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Pareek G, Hedican SP, Gee JR, et al. Meta-analysis of the complications of laparoscopic renal surgery: Comparison of procedures and techniques. J Urol 2006, 175:1208–1213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Sahashi M, Ohshima S. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: Nagoya experience. J Urol 1994, 152: 1962–1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Eraky I, el-Kappany H, Shamaa MA, Ghoneim MA. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: An established routine procedure. J Endourol 1994, 8: 275–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitenel approaches. J Endourol 1996,10:45–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Matsuura O, Ohshima S. Laparoscopic nephrectomy via the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 1996, 156: 1101–1104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Doublet JD, Peraldi MN, Monsaint H, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy of native kidneys in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1997, 64:89–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Hemal AK, Gupta NP, Wadhwa SN, Goel A, Kumar R. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: A single-center experience. Urology 2001, 57: 644–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Sebe P, de la Taille A, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC, Salomon L. Simple nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Prog Urol 2003, 13:577–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Poulsen EU, Eddy B, Poulsen J. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2005, 39:138–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wolf JS. Tips and tricks for hand-assisted surgery. AUA Update Series 2005,24:2Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rane A, Dasgupta P. Prospective experience with a second generation hand assisted laparoscopic device and comparison with first generation devices. J Endourol 2003,17:895–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rupa P, Stifelman MD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic devices: The second generation. J Endourol 2004,18:649–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic Surgery of the Kidney. (in Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th ed, Saunders, Elsevier, 2007, p1761.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin C. Zorn
    • 1
  • Arieh L. Shalhav
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Chicago Minimally Invasive Urology ProgramUniversity of Chicago Hospitals and Weiss Memorial HospitalChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Minimally Invasive UrologyUniversity of Chicago Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations