Abstract
An approach is offered here to assist the pathologist with the actual dissection of the operated heart at autopsy. The challenge to the pathologist is to define any underlying cardiac pathology, recognize changes in morphology brought about by prior surgical intervention, and correlate the gross cardiac findings with the hemodynamic status of the deceased prior to death. Even without detailed clinical records, one can still perform the dissection in a consistent and careful manner that allows an accurate assessment of the heart regardless of postoperative adhesions and complex surgical reconstructions. Developing the plane of dissection between the heart and adherent parietal pericardium should be done with a scalpel, using a methodical technique. As one examines the external surface of the heart, one may observe clues that the surgeon had used cardiopulmonary bypass to rest the heart during surgery and that specific surgical procedures had been performed. By removal of the coronary arteries with any bypass grafts off the heart and subsequent careful examination of the chambers and great vessels of the heart, the pathologist can then begin to understand the “real story.”
Keywords
Dissection Pericardium Heart surgery Coronary arteries Surgical footprints Cardiopulmonary bypass Sharp dissectionReferences
- 1.Field ML, Al-Alao B, Mediratta N, Sosnowski A. Open and closed chest extrathoracic cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal life support: methods, indications, and outcomes. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:323–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kamlot A, Bellows SD, Simkhovich BZ, Hale SL, Aoki A, Kloner RA, Kay GL. Is warm retrograde blood cardioplegia better than cold for myocardial protection? Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:98–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nerantzis CE, Lefkidis CA, Smirnoff TB, Agapitos EB, Davaris PS. Variations in the origin and course of the posterior interventricular artery in relation to the crux cordis and the posterior interventricular vein: an anatomical study. Anat Rec 1998;252:413–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Michalodimitrakis M, Mavroforou A, Giannoukas AD. Lessons learnt from the autopsies of 445 cases of sudden cardiac death in adults. Coron Artery Dis 2005;16:385–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Vargas SO, Sampson BA, Schoen FJ. Pathologic detection of early myocardial infarction: a critical review of the evolution and usefulness of modern techniques. Mod Pathol 1999;12:635–45. Review.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Nakagawa H, Lazzara R, Khastgir T, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Imai S, Pitha JV, Becker AE, Arruda M, Gonzalez MD, Widman LE, Rome M, Neuhauser J, Wang X, Calame JD, Goudeau MD, Jackman WM. Role of the tricuspid annulus and the eustachian valve/ridge on atrial flutter. Relevance to catheter ablation of the septal isthmus and a new technique for rapid identification of ablation success. Circulation 1996;94:407–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kirkeby-Garstad I, Tromsdal A, Sellevold OF, Bjorngaard M, Bjella LK, Berg EM, Karevold A, Haaverstad R, Wahba A, Tjomsland O, Astudillo R, Krogstad A, Stenseth R. Guiding surgical cannulation of the inferior vena cava with transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1288–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Vander Salm TJ. Coronary sinus cannulation: a technique to overcome an obstructing thebesian valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1441–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gillinov AM, Bhavani S, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Svensson LG, Navia JL, Pettersson BG, Sabik JF 3rd, Smedira NG, Mihaljevic T, McCarthy PM, Shewchik J, Natale A. Surgery for permanent atrial fibrillation: impact of patient factors and lesion set. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:502–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Solomon NA, Pranav SK, Naik D, Sukumaran S. Importance of preservation of chordal apparatus in mitral valve replacement. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2006;4:253–61. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Sherrid MV, Chaudhry FA, Swistel DG. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiography, pathophysiology, and the continuing evolution of surgery for obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2003 Feb;75(2):620–32. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tang GH, Rao V, Siu S, Butany J. Thrombosis of mechanical mitral valve prosthesis. J Card Surg 2005;20:481–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:384–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Zilla P, Human P, Bezuidenhout D. Bioprosthetic heart valves: the need for a quantum leap. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2004;40:57–66. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lund O, Bland M. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:20–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Machackova J, Barta J, Dhalla NS. Myofibrillar remodeling in cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure and cardiomyopathies. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:953–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar