Preeclampsia

  • Allison L. Cohen
  • S. Ananth Karumanchi
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Diabetes book series (CDI)

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a syndrome of new-onset hypertension and proteinuria after 20-weeks gestation in a previously normotensive woman. Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality throughout the world. There are multiple risk factors for preeclampsia, including pregestational diabetes and obesity. Women with preeclampsia have an increased risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies and have an increased long-term risk of cardiovascular disease.

Although the etiology of preeclampsia is still unclear, recent studies have elucidated the pathophysiology underlying the disease. All of the clinical features of preeclampsia can be explained as a maternal response to placental-derived toxic factors that lead to generalized endothelial dysfunction. Recent evidence has shown alterations in angiogenic factors, including an increase in soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), a naturally occurring circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonist, in women with preeclampsia. Soluble endoglin (sEng), a novel placenta-derived soluble anti-angiogenic protein appears to be another mediator of preeclampsia. Abnormalities in these circulating angiogenic proteins are not only present during clinical preeclampsia, but also antedate clinical symptoms by several weeks. There are also immunologic changes and changes in the renin-angiotensin system that may lead to the development of preeclampsia.

Women with pregestational diabetes have an increased risk of preeclampsia, especially those with underlying renal disease. It is especially difficult to diagnose preeclampsia in these women with underlying hypertension and proteinuria. In this chapter, we will discuss the epidemiology and the recent developments in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. We will also highlight the contribution of pregestational diabetes in preeclampsia and discuss the long term of implications for maternal health in women with a history of preeclampsia.

Key words

Preeclampsia Vascular endothelial growth factor Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 receptor Placental like growth factor Endoglin Diabetes Proteinuria Angiogenesis Gestational hypertension 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A.L.C. is funded by the Clinical Investigator Training Program: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard/MIT Health Sciences and Technology, in collaboration with Pfizer Inc., and Merck & Co. S.A.K. is funded by R01 grants from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 065997) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL079594).

References

  1. 1.
    ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;77:67–75Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cunningham FG, Lindheimer MD. Hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1992;326:927–932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saftlas AF, Olson DR, Franks AL, et al. Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979–1986. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:460–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Maternal mortality - United States, 1982–1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47:705Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sibai BM, Gordon T, Thorn E, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women; a prospective multicenter study. The National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:642–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sibai BM, Caritis S, Hauth J, et al. Risks of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:364–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moodley J. Maternal deaths due to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: saving Mothers report 2002–2004. Cardiovasc J Afr 2007;18:358–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duley L. Maternal mortality associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:547–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan SK, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066–1074PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mackay AP, Berg CJ, Atrash HK. Pregnancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:533–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, et al. The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ 2005;330:576–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sibai BM, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2005;365:785–799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for preeclampsia at antenatal booking: systemic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2005;330:565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dekker G, Sibai B. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of preeclampsia. Lancet 2001;357:209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Einarsson JI, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Gardner NO. Sperm exposure and the development of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1241–1243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dekker G, Robillary PY. The birth interval hypothesis - does it really indicate the end of the primipaternity hypothesis? J Reprod Immunol 2003;59:245–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Brien TE, Ray JG, Chan WS. Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview. Epidemiology 2003;14:368–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolf M, Sandler L, Munoz K, et al. First trimester insulin resistance and subsequent preeclampsia: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:1563–1568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bower S, Schuchter K, Campbell S. Doppler ultrasound screening as part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:989–994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brosens I, Dixon HG. The anatomy of the maternal side of the placenta. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1966;73:357–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah DM. Preeclampsia: new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2007;16:213–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cross JC, Werb Z, Fisher SJ. Implantation and the placenta: key pieces of the development puzzle. Science 1994;266:1508–1518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim KH, Zhou Y Janatpour M, et al. Human cytotrophoblast differentiation/invasion is abnormal in preeclampsia. Am J Pathol 1997;151:1809–1818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou Y, Damsky CH, Fisher SJ. Preeclampsia is associated with failure of human cytotrophoblasts to mimic a vascular adhesion phenotype. One cause of defective endovascular invasion in this syndrome? J Clin Invest 1997;99:2152–2164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts JM, Redman CW. Pre-eclampsia: more than pregnancy-induced hypertension. Lancet 1993;341:1447–1451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meekins JW, Pijnenborg R, Hanssens M, et al. A study of placental bed spiral arteries and trophoblast invasion in normal and severe pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:669–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhou Y, Damsky CH, Chiu K, et al. Preeclampsia is associated with abnormal expression of adhesion molecules by invasive cytorophoblasts. J Clin Invest 1993;91:950–960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karumanchi SA, Bdolah Y. Hypoxia and sFlt-1 in preeclampsia: the ‘chicken-and-egg’ question. Endocrinology 2004;145:4835–4837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Redman CW, Sacks GP, Sargent IL. Preeclampsia: an excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:499–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Goldfien A. Clinical and biochemical evidence of endothelial cell dysfunction in the pregnancy syndrome preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens 1991;4:700–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Levine RJ, Qian C, Maynard SE, et al. Serum sFlt1 concentration during preeclampsia and mid trimester blood pressure in healthy nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1034–1041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strevens H, Wide-Swensson D, Hansen A et al. Glomerular endotheliosis in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. BJOG 2003;110:831–836PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Calvin S, Corrigan J, Weinstein L. Factor VIII: von Willebrand factor patterns in the plasma of patients with pre-eclampsia. Am J Perinatol 1988;5:29–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lockwood CJ, Peters JH. Increased plasma levels of ED1+ cellular fibronectin precede the clinical signs of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:358–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nova A, Sibai BM, Barton JR, et al. Maternal plasma level of endothelin is increased in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:724–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Higgins JR, Papayianni A, Brady HR, et al. Circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and normal pregnancy: evidence of selective dysregulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 homeostasis in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:464–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davidge ST. Oxidative stress and altered endothelial cell function in preeclampsia. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1998;16:65–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hubel CA, McLaughlin MK, Evans RW, et al. Fasting serum trigylerides, free fatty acids, and malondialdehyde are increased in the preeclampsia, are positively correlated, and decrease within 48 hours postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:975–982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kolben M, Lopens A, Blaser J, et al. Measuring the concentration of various plasma and placenta extract proteolytic and vascular factors in pregnant patients with HELLP syndrome, pre-eclampsia, and highly pathologic Doppler flow values. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 1995;35(suppl 1):126–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chappell LC, Seed PT, Briley A, et al. A longitudinal study of biochemical variables in women at risk for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:127–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mills JL, DerSimonian R, Raymond E, et al. Prostacylin and thromboxane changes predating clinical onset of preeclampsia: a multicenter prospective study. JAMA 1999;282:356–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gant NF, Daley GL, Chand S, et al. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J Clin Invest 1973;52:2682–2689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Clark BA, Halvorson L, Sachs B, et al. Plasma endothelin levels in preeclampsia: elevation and correlation with uric acid levels and renal impairment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:962–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Knock GA, Poston L. Bradykinin-mediated relaxation of isolated maternal resistance arteries in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1668–1774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McCarthy AL, Woolfson RG, Raju SK, et al. Abnormal endothelial cell function of resistance arteries from women with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1323–1330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cockell AP, Posten L. Flow medicated vasodilation is enhanced in normal pregnancy but reduced in preeclampsia. Hypertension 1997;30:247–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Takase B, Hamabe A, Uehata A, et al. Flow-mediated dilation in brachial artery in the second half of pregnancy and prediction of pre-eclampsia. J Hum Hypertens 2003;17:697–704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Garcia RG, celadon J, Sierra-Laguado J, et al. Raised C-reactive protein and impaired vasodilation precede the development of preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:98–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chambers JC, Fusi L, Malik IS, et al. Association of maternal endothelial dysfunction with preeclampsia. JAMA 2001;285:1607–1612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kendall RL, Thomas KA. Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth factor activity by an endogenously encoded soluble receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:10705–10709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:649–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Koga K, Osuga Y, Yoshino O, et al. Elevated serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR-1) levels in women with preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:2348–2351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tsatsaris V, Goffin F, Munaut C, et al. Overexpression of the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in preeclamptic patients: pathophysiological consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5555–5563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Espinoza J, et al. Evidence supporting a role for blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor systerm in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Young Investigator Award. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1541–1547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Taylor RN, Grimwood J, Taylor RS, et al. Longitudinal serum concentrations of placental growth factor: evidence for abnormal placental angiogenesis in pathologic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:177–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk for preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:992–1005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med 2006;12:642–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Luft FC. Soluble endoglin (sEng) joins the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt) receptor as a preeclampsia molecule. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:3052–3054PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    AbdAlla S, Lother H, el Massiery A, et al. Increased AT(1) receptor heterodimers in preeclampsia mediate enhanced angiotensin II responsiveness. Nat Med 2001;7:1003–1009PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang JX, Knottnerus AM, Schui G, et al. Surgically obtained sperm ad risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2002;359:673–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Robillard PY, Hulsey TC, Perianin J, et al. Association of pregnancy-induced hypertension with duration of sexual cohabitation before conception. Lancet 1994;344:973–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Koelman CA, Coumans AB, Nijman HW, et al. Correlation between oral sex and low incidence of preeclampsia: a role for soluble HLA in seminal fluid. J Reprod Immunol 2000;46:155–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Saftlas AF, Beydoun H, Triche E. Immunogenetic determinants of preeclampsia and related pregnancy disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:162–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Skinner SL, Lumbers Er, Symonds EM. Analysis of changes in the rennin-angiotensin system during pregnancy. Clin Sci 1972;42:479–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brown MA, Zammit VC, Mitar DA, et al. Renin-aldosterone relationships in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:366–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Symonds EM, Broughton Pipkin F, Craven DJ. Changes in the renin-angiotensin system in primigravidae with hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:643–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Granger JP, Alexander BT, Bennett WA, et al. Pathophysiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2001;14:178S–185SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wallukat G, Homuth V, Fischer T, et al. Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor. J Clin Invest 1999;103:945–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Dechend R, Gratze P, Wallukat G, et al. Agonistic autoantibodies ot the AT1 receptor in a transgenic rat model of preeclmapsia. Hypertension 2005;45:742–746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mogren I, Hogberg U, Winkvist A, et al. Familial occurrence of preeclampsia. Epidemiology 1999;10:518–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cincotta RB, Brennecke SP. Family history of pre-eclampsia as a predictor for pre-eclampsia in primigravidas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;60:23–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Skjaerven R, Vatten LJ, Wilcox AJ, et al. Recurrence of pre-eclampsia across generations: exploring fetal and maternal genetic components in a population based cohort. BMJ 2005;331:877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Carr DB, Epplein M, Johnson CO, et al. A sister’s risk: family history as a predictor of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:965–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H, et al. Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study. BMJ 1998;316:1343–1347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Esplin MS, Fausett MB, Fraser A, et al. Paternal and maternal components of the predisposition to preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2001;344:867–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Arngrimsson R, Sigurard ttir S, Frigge ML, et al. A genome-wide scan reveals a maternal susceptibility locus for pre-eclampsia on chromosome 2p13. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:1799–1805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Tuohy Y, James DK. Pre-eclampsia and trisomy 13. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:891–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bdolah Y, Palomaki GE, Yaron Y, et al. Circulating angiogenic proteins in trisomy 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:239–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Posten L. Endothelial dysfunction in pre-eclampsia. Pharmacol Rep 2006;58:S69–S74Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Posten L, Raijmakers MT. Trophoblast oxidative stress, antioxidants, and pregnancy outcome - a review. Placenta 2004;25:S72–S78Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Barden A. Pre-eclampsia: contributions of maternal constitutional factors and the consequences for cardiovascular health. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2006;33:826–830PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cracowksi JL, Durand T, Bessard G. Isoprostanes as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation in humans: physiology, pharmacology, and clinical implications. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002;23:360–366Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Barden A, Ritchie J, Walters B, et al. Study of plasma factors associated with neutrophil activation and lipid peroxidation in pre-eclampsia. Hypertension 2001;38:803–808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Barden A, Beilin LJ, Ritchie J, et al. Plasma and urinary 8-iso-prostane as an indicator of lipid peroxidation in pre-eclampsia and normal pregnancy. Clin Sci 1996;91:711–718PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    McKinney ET, Shouri R, Hunt Rs, et al. Plasma, urinary, and salivary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2alpha levels in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:874–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Moretti M, Phillips M, Abouzeid A, et al. Increased breath markers of oxidative stress in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1184–1190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Posten L, Briley AL, Seed PT, et al. Vitamin C and vitamin E in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia (VIP trial): randomized placebo controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367:1145–1154Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Rumbold AR, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, et al. Vitamins C and E and the risk of preeclampsia and perinatal complications. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1796–1806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Barden A, Graham D, Beilin LJ, et al. Neutrophil CD11b expression and neutrophil activation in pre-eclampsia. Clin Sci 1997;92:37–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Saito S, Sakai M. Th1/Th2 balance in pre-eclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2003;59:161–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Conrad KP, Miles TM, Benyo DF. Circulating levels of immunoreactive cytokines in women with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol 1998;40:102–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Vince GS, Starkey PM, Austgulen R, et al. Interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptors in women with pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:20–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Benyo DF, Smarason A, Redman CW, et al. Expression of inflammatory cytokines in the placentas from women with pre-eclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:2505–2512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Heyl W, Handt S, Reister F, et al. Elevated soluble adhesion molecules in women with pre-eclampsia. Do Cytokines like tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta cause endothelial activation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;86:35–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Haig D. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Q Rev Biol 1993;68:495–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Trivers RL. Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 1974;14:249–264Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Yuan HT, Haig D, Karumanchi SA. Angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Curr Top Dev Biol 2005;71:297–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Salahuddin S, Lee Y, Vadnais M, et al. Diagnostic utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:28.e1–28.e6Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Buhimchi CS, Norwitz ER, Funai E, et al. Urinary angiogenic factors cluster hypertensive disorders and identify women with severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:734–741Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Cohen A, Lim KH, Lee Y, et al. Circulating levels of the antiangiogenic marker soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 are elevated in women with pregestational diabetes and preeclampsia: angiogenic markers in preeclampsia and preexisting diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:375–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Williams WW, Ecker JL, Thadhani RI, et al. A 29-year-old pregnant woman with nephritic syndrome and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2590–2600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lam C, Lim KH, Karumanchi SA. Circulating angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2005;46:1077–1085PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wolf M, Hubel CA, Lam C, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular disease: potential role of altered angiogenesis and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:6239–6243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim YM, et al. Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated prior to the clinical diagnosis of preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:3–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Levine RJ, Thadani R, Qian C, et al. Urinary placental growth factor and risk of preeclampsia. JAMA 2005;293:77–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Aggarwal PK, Jain V, Sakhuja V, et al. Low urinary placental growth factor is a marker of preeclampsia. Kidney Int 2006;69:621–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Buhimschi CS, Magloire L, Funai E, et al. Fractional excretion of angiogenic factors in women with severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1103–1113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Widmer M, Villar J, Benigni A, et al. Mapping the theories of preeclampsia and the role of angiogenic factors. A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:168–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ekbom P, Damm P, Feldt-Rasmussen B, et al. Pregnancy outcome in type 1 diabetic women with microalbuminuria. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1739–1744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Reece AE, Leguizaman G, Homko C. Stringent control in diabetic nephropathy associated with optimization of pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Med 1998;7:213–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Combs CA, Rosenn B, Kitzmiller JL, et al. Early-pregnancy proteinuria in diabetes related to preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:802–807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Ekbom P, and the Copenhagen Preeclampsia in Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group. Pre-pregnancy microalbuminuria predicts preeclampsia in diabetes mellitus (letter). Lancet 1999;353:377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Cundy T, Slee F, Gamble G, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2002;19:482–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Gordin D, Hiilesmaa V, Fagerudd J, et al. Pre-eclampsia but not pregnancy-induced hypertension is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic women. Diabetologia 2007;50:516–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Working group report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:S1–S22Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:181–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Hauth JC, Ewell MG, Levine RL, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparous women who subsequently developed hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:24–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Irgens LM. The medical birth registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:435–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, et al. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systemic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;335:974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Ivar T, et al. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of preeclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ 2007;335:978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Aagaard-Tillery KM, Stoddard GJ, Holmgren C, et al. Preeclampsia and subsequent risk of cancer in Utah. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:691–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Xue F, Michels KB. Intrauterine factors and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:1088–1100PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allison L. Cohen
    • 1
  • S. Ananth Karumanchi
  1. 1.Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin PlaceBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations