Differences and Disparities in Cardiovascular Medicine Related to Gender, Race, and Ethnicity: The Role of Cardiac CT

  • John W. NanceEmail author
Part of the Contemporary Medical Imaging book series (CMI)


Knowledge of demographic differences in physiology, pathology, and therapeutic response is necessary for optimal patient diagnosis and treatment. However, there are demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic differences in healthcare access, disease occurrence, and resultant morbidity/mortality that transcend biology; these differences constitute healthcare and health status disparities. Some differences in healthcare quality are due to clinical appropriateness/need and patient preferences, which may be appropriate, but there is also well-established discrimination as well as differences in the operation of healthcare systems leading to unnecessary, unjust, and avoidable inequities. An understanding of both unavoidable biological differences and avoidable disparities in cardiovascular health and care is necessary to appropriately select patients for cardiac CT, interpret the findings, and guide further management. Differences and disparities, as defined above, will be discussed concurrently.


Cardiovascular medicine related to gender, race, and ethnicity Cardiac CT and gender, race, and ethnicity Gender and cardiovascular imaging Gender in cardiac care Race and ethnicity in cardiac care 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Clark LT. Issues in minority health: atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in African Americans. Med Clin North Am. 2005;89(5):977–1001, 994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Savage DD. Highlights from the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Black and Minority Health. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 1986;1(2):16–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Ethnic disparities in health. In: Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, editors. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mozaffarian D, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shah T, Palaskas N, Ahmed A. An update on gender disparities in coronary heart disease care. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18(5):28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liao Y, et al. The relative effects of left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, and ventricular dysfunction on survival among black adults. JAMA. 1995;273(20):1592–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bild DE, et al. Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2005;111(10):1313–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nance JW Jr, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis in African American and white patients with acute chest pain: characterization with coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2011;260(2):373–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Detrano R, et al. Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1336–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doherty TM, Tang W, Detrano RC. Racial differences in the significance of coronary calcium in asymptomatic black and white subjects with coronary risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(3):787–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hulten E, et al. Usefulness of coronary computed tomography angiography to predict mortality and myocardial infarction among Caucasian, African and East Asian ethnicities (from the CONFIRM [Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter] Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(4):479–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardin JM, et al. Do differences in subclinical cardiovascular disease in Mexican Americans versus European Americans help explain the Hispanic paradox? Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(2):205–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graham G. Racial and ethnic differences in acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarction within the United States: from demographics to outcomes. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39(5):299–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallo LC, et al. Do socioeconomic gradients in subclinical atherosclerosis vary according to acculturation level? Analyses of Mexican-Americans in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Psychosom Med. 2009;71(7):756–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jug B, et al. Influence of race and ethnicity on diagnostic performance of 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1521–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gholizadeh L, Davidson P. More similarities than differences: an international comparison of CVD mortality and risk factors in women. Health Care Women Int. 2008;29(1):3–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mosca L, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1404–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mieres JH, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;130(4):350–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fihn SD, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44–e164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor AJ, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(22):1864–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jespersen L, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(6):734–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Min JK, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(8):849–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pepine CJ, et al. Emergence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a woman's problem and need for change in definition on angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(17):1918–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations