Application of Covalently Modified Glass Fibre Supports to Microsequence Analysis

  • Rainer Frank
  • Keith Ashman
Chapter
Part of the Experimental Biology and Medicine book series (EBAM, volume 14)

Abstract

Polybrene, is generally accepted as a protein carrier in gas-liquid phase sequencing [1]. The modifier covers the negatively charged glass surface with a polymeric matrix of quaternary ammonium ions bridged by hydrophobic hexamethylene and trimethylene groups. This may give the support the potential of binding basic proteins as well as acidic and SDS-treated proteins by enabling multiple ionic and hydrophobic interactions. Although the problem of protein immobilisation seemed to be solved with the introduction of polybrene there are a number of serious drawbacks. The polybrene coated glass fibre filter has to be purified before sample application by performing 3 to 5 degradation cycles. This precycling procedure normally reduces the major background peaks (DPTU, DMPTU) to a practicable level but the remaining UV-absorbing contaminants often interfere when detecting PTH-amino acids at high sensitivity. This is illustrated in Fig. 1A, where the UV-traces of the third precycling step of a polybrene coated glass fiber filter with no added polypeptide are shown. Both DPTU and DMPTU are still giving signals equivalent to about 20–100 picomoles of PTH-amino acid. Another drawback is the unpredictable and relatively low initial yield which is reported for sperm whale myoglobin between 25% [2] and 78% [3].

Keywords

Glass Fibre Methyl Iodide Initial Yield Trimethylammonium Chloride Propyl Trimethoxysilane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hewick, R. M., Hunkapiller, M. W., Hood, L. E., and Dreyer, W. J (1981). Biol. Chem. 256, 7990–7997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esch, F. S. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 136, 39–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hawke, D. H., Harris, D. C., and Shively, J. E. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 147, 315–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aebersold, R. H., Teplow, D. B., Hood, L. E., and Kent, S. B. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4229–4238.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gausepohl, H., Trosin, M. and Frank, R. (1986) in Advanced Methods in Protein Microsequence Analysis (eds. Wittmann-Liebold et al.) pp. 149–160 Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lottspeich, F. (1980) Hoppe-Seyler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 361, 1829–1834.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Frank
    • 1
  • Keith Ashman
    • 1
  1. 1.European Molecular Biology LaboratoryHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations