Additional Applications

  • Michael D. Collins
  • William L. Siegmann


The parabolic equation method is widely used in ocean acoustics and seismology. There are many additional applications, including a few that are covered in this chapter. The acoustic wave equation is derived from the equations of fluid mechanics by considering a small amplitude perturbation of a steady state [1]. The same approach may be used to derive linear wave equations that account for the effects of ambient flow and buoyancy. Wind often has significant effects in atmospheric acoustics. A generalization of the adiabatic mode solution is applicable to the case of small Mach number in which the effects of advection can be treated as a perturbation [2]. Internal gravity waves and acousto-gravity waves exist when the effects of buoyancy are significant [3]. A poro-elastic medium is a porous solid with fluid-filled pore spaces. The poro-elastic wave equation was originally derived by Biot using a macroscopic approach [4–7], but it has also been derived as a limiting case of the elastic wave equation for a fluid-solid conglomerate [8]. Poro-elastic media support fast compressional, slow compressional, shear, boundary, and interface waves. The fast wave corresponds to motions of the solid frame and the fluid that are in phase with each other. The slow wave, which corresponds to motions that are out of phase, is strongly attenuated by viscous effects but has been observed experimentally [9]. One of the applications of the poro-elastic parabolic equation is ocean acoustics problems involving interactions with porous sediments [10].


  1. 1.
    A.E. Gill, Ocean-Atmosphere Dynamics (Academic, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.D. Collins, B.E. McDonald, W.A. Kuperman, and W.L. Siegmann, “Jovian acoustics and Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2147–2158 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.F. Lingevitch, M.D. Collins, and W.L. Siegmann, “Parabolic equations for gravity and acousto-gravity waves,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3049–3056 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.A. Biot, “General theory of three-dimensional consolidation,” J. Appl. Phys. 12, 155–164 (1941).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Biot, “Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 168–191 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.A. Biot, “Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media,” J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1482–1498 (1962).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.A. Biot, “Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1254–1264 (1962).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Burridge and J.B. Keller, “Poroelasticity equations derived from microstructure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70, 1140–1146 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.J. Plona, “Observation of a second bulk compressional wave in a porous medium at ultrasonic frequencies,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 259–261 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.D. Collins, W.A. Kuperman, and W.L. Siegmann, “A parabolic equation for poro-elastic media,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1645–1656 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.D. Pierce, “Wave equation for sound in fluids with unsteady inhomogeneous flow,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2292–2299 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.H. Nayfeh, Introduction to Perturbation Techniques (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981), pp. 412–414.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.F. Lindal, G.E. Wood, G.S. Levy, J.D. Anderson, D.N. Sweetnam, H.B. Hotz, B.J. Buckles, D.P. Holmes, P.E. Doms, V.R. Eshleman, G.L. Tyler, and T.A. Croft, “The atmosphere of Jupiter: An analysis of the Voyager Radio Occultation Measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 86, 8721–8727 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.S. Limaye, “Jupiter: New estimates of the mean zonal flow at the cloud level,” Icarus 65, 335–352 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.A. Colosi, S.M. Flatté, and C. Bracher, “Internal-wave effects on 1000-km oceanic acoustic pulse propagation: Simulation and comparison with experiment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 452–468 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Garrett and W. Munk, “Space-time scales of internal waves: A progress report,” J. Geophys. Res. 80, 291–297 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Standard Atmosphere (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, Third Edition (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970), pp. 39–40.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Collins
    • 1
  • William L. Siegmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Naval Research LaboratoryWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations