Advertisement

Respiratory Viral Infections in Transplant Recipients

  • Catherine LiuEmail author
  • Dora Y. Ho
  • Michael Boeckh
Chapter
  • 416 Downloads

Abstract

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are common among the general population; however, these often mild viral illnesses can lead to serious morbidity and mortality among recipients of hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation. The disease spectrum ranges from asymptomatic or mild infections to life-threatening lower respiratory tract infection or long-term airflow obstruction syndromes. Progression to lower respiratory tract infection or to respiratory failure is determined by the intrinsic virulence of the specific viral pathogen as well as various host factors, including the type of transplantation, status of the host’s immune dysfunction, the underlying disease, and other comorbidities. This chapter focuses on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of RVIs in this susceptible population and includes respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, human metapneumovirus, influenza virus, human coronavirus, and human rhinovirus. The optimal management of these infections is limited by the overall paucity of available treatment, highlighting the need for new antiviral drug or immunotherapies.

Keywords

Transplantation Respiratory syncytial virus Parainfluenza virus Human metapneumovirus Influenza virus Human coronavirus Human rhinovirus 

Introduction

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are common causes of illness in humans. While such infections tend to be mild and self-limiting in healthy individuals, severe or even life-threatening disease can be seen in immunocompromised hosts, as well as the very young and the elderly. In particular, RVIs are frequently associated with significant morbidity following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT). A number of RNA and DNA viruses can cause respiratory tract infections. This chapter focuses on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza viruses (PIVs), human metapneumovirus (HMPV), influenza viruses, human coronaviruses (HCoV), and human rhinoviruses (HRV).

The respiratory viruses are associated with a wide range of clinical syndromes in the general population, including the common cold, pharyngitis, tracheobronchitis, laryngotracheobronchitis (croup), bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. For transplant recipients, disease spectrum similarly spans from asymptomatic or mild infections to life-threatening lower respiratory tract involvement, although severe complications tend to be more frequent. The severity and outcome of infection largely depend on the type of virus as well as host factors, including the type of transplantation and the degree of immunosuppression at the time of infection. Coinfections with other pulmonary pathogens including bacteria or fungi, e.g., Aspergillus species, Pneumocystis jiroveci, or other viruses like CMV or more than one respiratory viruses, are also common and can further complicate treatment and lead to poorer outcomes [1, 2, 3]. For HSCT recipients, most RVIs occur in 1–10% of the patients during the first 100 days post-transplantation [1, 4, 5], with cumulative incidence varying from a few percent (e.g., HMPV, influenza, RSV, PIVs) to 11–22% such as HCoV and HRV [5]. Infections with RSV, influenza, HMPV, PIVs, and adenovirus have a higher risk of progression from upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and tend to cause the most serious disease, with mortality rate of up to 40–60% among those with LRTI [6, 7, 8, 9]; HRV and HCoV infections tend to be mild, but severe LRTI from these viruses can rarely occur [10]. Risk factors for disease progression to LRTI include pre-engraftment status, allogeneic transplant, myeloablative conditioning, graft-versus host disease, and lymphopenia [1, 2, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15].

SOT recipients can also suffer from severe disease and complications from RVI. Risk factors for disease progression are not as well defined, but those with lung and heart-lung transplant are particularly vulnerable. Cumulative rates of RVIs in lung transplant recipients range from 8% to 21% in retrospective studies of 5–7 years [16, 17], and a high incidence of progression to LRTI up to 26% has been reported [18]. In contrast, the incidence of RVIs among heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients is similar to that of the general population, although complications are more frequent [19].

In addition to direct effects from viral infection, RVIs may promote immunologically mediated lung injury in HSCT or lung transplant recipients, potentially leading to acute allograft rejection in the case of lung transplant recipients and/or the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), which is characterized by progressive circumferential fibrosis of the small terminal airways histopathologically, resulting in fixed airflow obstruction [20, 21]. BOS is the major limiting factor for long-term survival after lung transplantation [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. The reported incidence of BOS associated with RVIs ranges from 6% to 42% [17, 23], while the incidence of acute rejection associated with RVIs varies from 16% to as high as 82% [25, 28, 29, 30]. For HSCT, BOS is often observed in the setting of chronic graft-versus-host disease, but it has also been associated with RVIs [31, 32, 33, 34]. Among the respiratory viruses, RSV, PIV, HMPV, and influenza have all been associated with BOS [30, 35, 36], and mortality associated with these viruses can be up to 20% in lung transplant patients [37]. For heart, liver, or kidney transplantation, no relationship between RVI and rejection has been noted [19].

Paramyxoviruses

RSV, PIVs, and HMPV are members of the Paramyxoviridae family. The epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of each of these viruses are discussed separately.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations

RSV has two subtypes, A and B, with the former typically causing more severe disease. While both subtypes can simultaneously circulate during outbreaks, a few distinct genotypes of each subtype can predominate within a community. The dominant strains can also shift yearly. This shifting of viral strains, along with the waning protective immunity from natural infection, might account for frequent re-infections throughout life [38].

RSV usually causes mild and self-limited URTI in healthy older children and nonelderly adults, but certain patient populations are at risk for developing severe RSV infection, including premature or very young infants, elderly patients with comorbidities, or immunocompromised hosts [39, 40, 41]. RSV has been associated with apnea in young or preterm infants [42] and can cause severe LRTI in children including bronchiolitis, pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure [42]. Among adults infected with RSV, more than 80% are symptomatic, and lower respiratory tract signs and symptoms can occur in a quarter of the patients [43]. Signs of URTI include cough, rhinorrhea, and conjunctivitis, and compared to influenza, RSV is more frequently associated with nasal congestion, ear and sinus involvement, productive cough, and longer duration of illness [43].

RSV Infection in Transplantation

For transplant patients, RSV is a leading cause of viral respiratory tract infections [44, 45]. Among HSCT recipients, the incidence may be as high as 10% during winter months [6]. URTI precedes pneumonia in 80–90% of patients, and approximately 30–40% of patients with URTI progress to pneumonia after a median of 7 days [46]. Attributable mortality among HSCT patients ranges from 7% to 83% [47, 48], with more recent studies showing mortality rates of about 20–35% [49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54]. Risk factors for the development of LRTI include allogeneic transplant, mismatched or unrelated transplant, presence of graft versus host disease, myeloablative regimens, advanced age, prolonged lymphopenia, relapse of malignancy, and lack of engraftment [1, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 55, 56].

For SOT recipients, RSV-associated mortality rate is significantly lower than that experienced in HSCT [57] although mortality rates among lung transplant patients of up to 20% have been reported [17, 37]. While there have been some reports of favorable outcomes in lung transplant recipients even in the absence of specific antiviral treatment [58], other studies suggest that up to 33% of RSV-infected patients develop long-term pulmonary dysfunction [23, 24, 37] and up to 60% have worsening of BOS stage [58].

Treatment of RSV

Available Agents for RSV Treatment

Treatment modalities for RSV are limited to ribavirin with or without the addition of immunomodulatory agents and/or corticosteroids. Currently, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapy for RSV is aerosolized ribavirin (1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboximide) , which was licensed in 1986 for the treatment of RSV LRTI in hospitalized high-risk infants and young children [59]. Ribavirin is a synthetic nucleoside analog with a broad spectrum of activities against many RNA and DNA viruses in vitro and in vivo. It competitively inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase and can be incorporated into the viral genome, leading to lethal mutagenesis [60]. The drug also has immunomodulatory properties that might contribute to its efficacy in vivo [61, 62].

The standard regimen of aerosolized ribavirin consists of a daily dose of 6 g delivered at a concentration of 20 mg/ml of sterile water for 18 h/day. Due to potential teratogenicity, the drug is usually administered to patients within a scavenging tent and preferably in a negative pressure room to prevent environmental contamination. After administration, the room needs to be cleaned to minimize secondary exposure to health care workers and visitors [48]. Women of childbearing potential should not care for or visit patients receiving aerosolized ribavirin. For ease of administration and improved compliance, the drug is often delivered with an intermittent dosing schedule at 2 g administered for 2–3 h every 8 h [63, 64]. In a randomized trial of 50 subjects, patients receiving intermittent vs continuous dosing had a lower incidence of progression from URTI to LRTI [65]. The reported duration of treatment is variable in the literature; the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4) guidelines recommend a duration of 7–10 days [66].

Side effects of aerosolized ribavirin treatment include cough, dyspnea, bronchospasm, rash, nausea, headache, and conjunctival irritation. Patients can also experience claustrophobia and deterioration of pulmonary function. Ribavirin can also be administered intravenously or orally, with major side effects including hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, and hyperbilirubinemia [47].

Intravenous RSV-specific immunoglobulin (RSV-IVIG and palivizumab [PVZ]) were licensed initially for prevention of serious complications from RSV infection in high-risk children (refer to section “Immunoprophylaxis”) [67], but they have also been employed for RSV treatment [68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG ) is also frequently used for the treatment of RSV and other severe viral infections in transplant recipients. The efficacy of these agents for prophylaxis or treatment among transplant patients has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials although in an observational study of HSCT patients with RSV LRTI, multivariate analysis did not find any effect of antibody-based therapies on treatment outcomes [73].

Treatment of RSV in HSCT

The evaluation of any treatment modalities for RSV, or any other respiratory viruses, has been limited by the fact that most published studies are small observational studies which lack standardized definitions of URTI and LRTI, use different dosages and duration of therapy, and are subject to selection and publication bias. Among dozens of reports on the treatment of RSV in HSCT patients, there have only been two small randomized clinical trials. One study of aerosolized ribavirin was discontinued due to slow accrual, after enrollment of 14 patients in 5 years [69]. The other trial enrolled 50 patients and found that an intermittent dosing schedule of aerosolized ribavirin for treatment of RSV URTI was more effective than a continuous dosing schedule for prevention of progression to LRTI [64].

Two pooled analyses of published studies between 1980 and 2010 suggest that treatment of RSV URTI and LRTI with aerosolized ribavirin and IVIG reduces the risk of progression to LRTI in individuals with URTI and reduces mortality [47, 48]. When compared to no treatment, aerosolized ribavirin decreased the rate of progression to LRTI and mortality with the greatest impact observed when aerosolized ribavirin was given in combination with an immunomodulator. Specifically, when comparing aerosolized ribavirin treatment alone with no treatment, progression to LRTI was decreased from 47% to 25% and the mortality rate was reduced from 89% to 50% [47]. The addition of immunomodulators such as PVZ, IVIG, and/or RSV-IVIG to ribavirin compared to no treatment decreased progression to LTRI from 45% to 12% and mortality rate from 77% to 24%. There are paucity of reports on the use of intravenous or oral ribavirin, but the combined data suggest a benefit compared to no treatment. It is important to recognize that neither of these systematic reviews represented formal meta-analyses; there was no adjustment for confounders, and thus, results should be interpreted with caution. The only trial to date that evaluated PVZ as monotherapy for the treatment of RSV infection in HSCT recipients showed no benefit in prevention of progression to LRTI or mortality [74].

Overall, these analyses show a trend toward improved outcomes with regard to progression to LRTI and mortality among HSCT recipients treated with a combination of aerosolized ribavirin and immunomodulators than those treated with aerosolized ribavirin alone or with intravenous/oral ribavirin, or those given no treatment. However, the use of aerosolized ribavirin is cumbersome and very costly with the price increase in 2015 to $30,000 per day [75]. In addition, the aerosolized form of ribavirin is not available in all countries, and the intravenous form is not commercially available in the United States. The experience with oral ribavirin in HSCT is limited and warrants further evaluation, but some studies suggest that it may be a safe and effective alternative to aerosolized ribavirin for the treatment of RSV [51, 76, 77, 78]. In a retrospective study of 124 HSCT recipients with RSV infection, there was no difference in rates of progression to LRTI and mortality among patients receiving oral compared to aerosolized ribavirin [51]. The optimal dose of oral ribavirin for treatment of RSV is unclear and quite variable in the literature [79]. Commonly described dosing strategies include a fixed dose of 600–800 mg two or three times a day or a loading dose of 10 mg/kg followed by 20 mg/kg/day divided into three doses, adjusted for renal failure [51, 77, 79].

Treatment of RSV in SOT

Similar to the HSCT population, the mainstay of treatment for paramyxoviral infections in SOT populations has been aerosolized ribavirin [37, 80]. In an observational study, a combination of aerosolized ribavirin, IVIG, and corticosteroids was found to be safe and effective in preserving lung function in lung transplant recipients after RSV or PIV infections 29. Few studies have examined the role of oral ribavirin. Pelaez et al. [81] reported treatment of five lung transplant patients with RSV infection using oral ribavirin in combination with methylprednisolone and found this regimen well tolerated and effective with mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) returning to baseline with treatment. In a prospective observational study, oral ribavirin treatment in 38 patients with RSV, PIV, or HMPV infection was associated with earlier recovery of graft function and prevention of BOS as compared to 29 patients with only supportive care including corticosteroids [82]. In one study that evaluated lung transplant patients who received either aerosolized or oral ribavirin for RSV infection, no significant differences in 6-month outcomes were noted between the two groups, but variations in their adjunctive therapies, e.g., use of corticosteroids, IVIG, and/or montelukast, might have altered the patients’ clinical response [83]. Intravenous ribavirin was also found to be a safe and cost-effective treatment among 18 patients with RSV after lung transplantation [84].

Overall, these studies support the use of ribavirin in treating RSV infection among SOT recipients although it is important to recognize that the evidence is limited to small, uncontrolled studies. There are significant variabilities among these studies regarding the dose and duration of treatment as well as the use of immunomodulating agents such as corticosteroids, IVIG, or PVZ as adjunctive measures.

More recently, a new agent presatovir (GS-5806), an orally bioavailable antiviral agent that inhibits fusion of RSV with host cell membranes, is being developed for treatment of RSV infection. Phase II clinical trials studying HSCT and lung transplant recipients were completed, and the data on lung transplant recipients has been published [85]. In this Phase 2b randomized controlled trial that enrolled a total of 61 lung transplant patients with RSV, presatovir was apparently well tolerated, but its use did not result in improved viral or clinical or outcomes.

Parainfluenza Viruses (PIVs)

Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations

There are four distinct serotypes of PIVs, namely, PIV-1 to -4. These viruses can circulate throughout the year in most communities, although PIV-3, the dominant serotype affecting transplant populations, seems to have the highest prevalence during spring and summer seasons [38]. PIVs cause a spectrum of respiratory tract infections similar to RSV, but most are URTIs and result in fewer hospitalizations. PIV-1 and, to a lesser extent, PIV-2 are the principal causative agents of croup or laryngotracheobronchitis, primarily in children between the ages of 6 and 48 months. PIV-3 is most frequently associated with pneumonia and bronchiolitis; neonates, immunocompromised, and the elderly are at particular risk for severe disease. PIV-4 is infrequently detected and is thought to cause mostly asymptomatic or mild infections.

PIV Infection in Transplantation

Symptomatic PIV infection affects about 3–7% of HSCT recipients [2, 64, 86, 87] and approximately 3–5% of lung transplant recipients [28, 88]. LRTI can develop in up to 50% of PIV-infected HSCT patients, with associated mortality rate ranging from 12% to 57% [2, 8, 64, 86, 87, 89, 90]. Two large retrospective studies have evaluated PIV infections in HSCT and found that most patients (70–87%) presented with URTI, but 13–24% subsequently progressed to LRTI [2, 64]. Among those with LRTI, overall mortality at 30 days was 17–35% [2, 64]. Independent risk factors for progression to LRTI included receipt of corticosteroids at the time of URTI diagnosis, neutropenia, an APACHE II score >15, and respiratory coinfections. Independent predictors of death included relapsed or refractory underlying cancer, APACHE II score >15, and high-dose corticosteroid use considered in patients given cumulative dose of prednisolone >600 mg within 4 weeks of PIV diagnosis [2, 14]. Whether steroids are still important if adjusted for lymphopenia requires further study. While RSV infections are always symptomatic, asymptomatic shedding is present in about 1/3 of PIV-infected HSCT patients [91]. In a surveillance study of lung transplant recipients, asymptomatic PIV infection was present in 70% of patients [28].

PIV LRTI has also been associated with a significantly increased risk of severe airflow decline after HSCT when compared to RSV 31. For lung transplant patients, PIV has been associated with acute rejection and BOS [18, 28, 88, 92, 93].

Treatment of PIV

A number of studies reported treatment of PIV with ribavirin (see section “Treatment of RSV”), but most are limited to case reports or small series. For HSCT, both aerosolized [2, 86, 87, 94, 95] and oral ribavirin [96, 97] have been employed, although some patients received intravenous ribavirin when they did not respond to aerosolized or oral treatment [86, 98]. In a series that included 55 patients with PIV-3 LRTI, 31 were treated with aerosolized ribavirin with or without IVIG in a nonrandomized fashion. Such therapy did not appear to alter mortality from PIV-3 pneumonia or decrease the duration of viral shedding [2]. A more recent retrospective study evaluated 173 HSCT recipients with PIV infection [90]. Forty-one patients with LRTI were treated with aerosolized ribavirin with or without IVIG, but 100-day mortality of this group was similar to those with LRTI not treated with ribavirin. Overall, there is no convincing evidence that ribavirin is effective for treatment of PIV upper or lower tract disease in HCT recipients. Effective prophylaxis and treatment for PIV in HSCT population are desperately needed.

Successful treatment of PIV LRTI has been reported in heart transplant recipients with aerosolized ribavirin or with intravenous ribavirin plus methylprednisolone [99, 100] as well as in a kidney transplant recipients with aerosolized ribavirin and IVIG [101] although none of these studies included controls.

DAS181 is a novel sialidase fusion protein with activities against multiple strains of influenza and PIVs. It has been used for PIV treatment in a small number of HSCT and lung transplant recipients. The drug was found effective in most of these cases and was well tolerated [102, 103, 104, 105, 106]. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effects of DAS181 in immunocompromised hosts with LRTI by PIV has been completed, but no results have been published to date.

Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV)

Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations

HMPV was first described in 2001 among Dutch children with bronchitis [107], although serological studies indicate that it has been a cause of human infection since 1958 [108]. There are two subgroups of HMPV , A and B, and each with two clades, A1, A2, B1, and B2. All four subtypes co-circulate, while a single subtype tends to dominate each year [109]. HMPV has a worldwide distribution; it circulates in late winter to early spring in temperate climates and in late spring to summer in tropical regions [108].

HMPV may contribute to 12–20% of all previously virus-negative LRTI [110]. When compared to RSV, infection with HMPV tends to occur in slightly older children and cause milder symptoms, but severe disease can occur among small children, elderly, and those with immunosuppression or chronic medical conditions [111]. Clinical manifestations range from mild URTIs to severe pneumonia. Elderly patients are much more likely to experience dyspnea and wheezing than young adults, and hoarseness is a more common complaint when compared to other paramyxoviruses [112]. Among hospitalized patients and recipients of HSCT, wheezing is prominent and noted in up to 80–90% of patients [113, 114].

HMPV Infection in Transplantation

For patients with hematologic malignancies or HSCT, HMPV is responsible for approximately 3–14% of RVIs [114, 115, 116, 117]. A systematic review of HMPV infections among HSCT recipients and hematologic malignancy patients found that despite lack of directed antiviral therapy, overall mortality rates are low (6%) unless patients progress to LRTI (27%) [118]. Approximately one-third of patients with HMPV URTI develop LRTI [119].

In lung transplant recipients, HMPV is responsible for 14–30% of RVIs with a similar morbidity when compared to other community-acquired respiratory viruses [3, 35, 36, 120]. Acute HPMV infection has been associated with allograft rejection [36]. In a study [120] of 89 lung transplant patients who presented with RVIs, HMPV and RSV were equally prevalent and had similar clinical manifestations, although severe bronchospasm was less common with HMPV. A significant number of patients with either HMPV or RSV infection developed graft dysfunction (63% and 72%, respectively), but onset or progression of BOS occurred only in patients with RSV (38%) at 6 months and in none with HMPV. Another study of 60 lung transplant patients also showed that HMPV infection increased the risk of acute graft rejection without associated chronic rejection or BOS [3, 120].

Treatment of HMPV

Treatment for HMPV is largely supportive, as there is currently no antiviral therapy licensed for this virus. Ribavirin is active against HMPV in vitro and in animal models [121, 122]. In clinical settings, there have been scattered reports in the literature describing HMPV cases treated successfully using aerosolized, oral, or intravenous ribavirin given with or without IVIG [3, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126]. However, these studies did not include any untreated control groups, and the efficacy of these regimens cannot be determined. Some have suggested that ribavirin with IVIG may be considered as a treatment option for patients with severe disease [125], but this approach is not routinely used.

Several new approaches for treatment of HMPV are in development, including monoclonal antibodies against the fusion protein [127, 128] or synthetic peptides with antiviral activities [129]. Their efficacies against HMPV have been demonstrated in vitro and in animal models, but studies in human have not been reported.

Diagnosis of Paramyxoviruses

Radiographic Evaluation

LRTI by respiratory viruses produces a spectrum of imaging findings; with the most common high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) scan, observations include small, poorly defined centrilobular nodules or tree-in-bud opacities, ground-glass opacities, bronchial wall thickening, and air-space consolidations, which may be difficult to differentiate from other causes of pulmonary consolidation [130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137]. There is considerable overlap in the imaging appearance of viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal respiratory tract infections in transplant population. The findings such as tree-in-bud opacities, bronchial wall thickening, and peribronchiolar consolidation may suggest a viral etiology [138]. HRCT findings between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients are relatively similar [139], but infection with co-pathogens is common among transplant recipients, thus complicating interpretation of radiographic findings. Correlation with patient immune status, recent treatment, and exposure history, as well as epidemiologic factors, are essential to help narrow the list of possible etiologies both infectious and noninfectious and to guide diagnostic testing and appropriate therapy [130].

Laboratory Diagnosis of Paramyxoviruses

Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viruses is usually made by analysis of respiratory secretions. Samples can be obtained as a nasal wash, nasopharyngeal or throat swab, bronchoalveolar lavage, or, for those incubated, tracheal aspirate. Detection of the virus in the respiratory samples can be performed by cell culture, antigen testing, and PCR.

Viral isolation by cell culture used to be the gold standard for diagnosis but has largely been replaced by molecular studies. Reverse transcriptase (RT)–PCR is now routinely used for respiratory viral diagnosis for the detection of RNA viruses in respiratory secretions [140] and has higher sensitivity than either viral culture or antigen detection assays, particularly in immunocompromised patients [91, 140]. Compared with culture, the sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR techniques can reach 100% and 95–98%, respectively [141, 142, 143]. PCR-based tests for respiratory viral detection are often designed as part of a multiplex PCR assay that can allow detection of multiple respiratory pathogens simultaneously [144], and rapid point-of-care tests are being developed as well [145, 146].

Transmission and Prevention of Paramyxovirus Infection

The modes of transmission of PIVs and HMPV are not as well studied as RSV, but these respiratory viruses are mostly transmitted by direct person-to-person contact, through exposure to nasopharyngeal secretions from infected individuals such as respiratory droplets or by self-inoculation after touching contaminated surfaces has also been described [147, 148]. Outbreaks of RSV, PIVs, or HMPV have been reported in outpatient clinics, in long-term care facilities, and in hospitals, including hematology and HSCT units [94, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153]. To prevent transmission of respiratory viruses in health care setting, policies and procedures regarding patients with respiratory viruses should be formulated; in particular, compliance with proper hand hygiene and contact precautions are of paramount importance. Other infection control measures include isolating infected patients in private room, cohorting patients, and/or limiting transport of patients from their rooms. During a nosocomial outbreak, personnel caring for infected patients should be restricted from caring for uninfected high-risk patients if possible [154, 155, 156].

Immunoprophylaxis

PVZ is a RSV-specific humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the F glycoprotein of RSV and is FDA approved for immunoprophylaxis against RSV in high-risk children. Data for its use in immunocompromised adult patients are limited [48, 68], with only one uncontrolled study in the literature reporting the use of PVZ as immunoprophylaxis during an RSV outbreak in an adult HSCT unit [150]. RSV-IVIG prophylaxis has also been studied in high-risk adult HSCT recipients; an increase in antibody titers against RSV was demonstrated, but the study was underpowered to evaluate its efficacy [157]. There are several monoclonal antibodies against RSV under development.

Vaccines

Despite the major clinical importance of paramyxoviruses, there is currently no vaccine approved for these viruses in humans. Using various strategies for vaccine development, those tested in animal models include live-attenuated virus vaccines including chimeric and recombinant variety, inactivated virus vaccines, and subunit vaccines. A number of them are currently in phase I–II clinical trials [158, 159, 160, 161].

Other Strategies

In a retrospective study of 37 HSCT patients with pretransplant RSV URTI, 34 patients had their transplant delayed or conditioning aborted [162]. Overall, RSV pneumonia occurred in 1 of 34 patients for whom HSCT was delayed, compared with two of three patients for whom there was no delay. This study suggested that for HSCT candidates with pretransplant RSV URTI, a delay of HSCT might reduce the risk of developing RSV pneumonia. Thus, the strategy of delaying transplantation to prevent progression of a viral URTI to LRTI is recommended unless precluded by progression of underlying malignancy. There are limited data for other respiratory viruses [66, 147] although some proposed guidance is available (Table 40.1) [163].
Table 40.1

Recommendations for respiratory viral infections prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Virus

Recommendation for URTI

Recommendation for LRTI

RSV

Delay transplant if possible

If not possible to delay, consider oral ribavirin

Delay transplant; consider ribavirin if delay is not feasible (anecdotal data)

Influenza virus

Delay transplant if possible and treat

If not possible to delay, treat

Delay transplant and treat

Parainfluenza virus

Delay transplant if possible

If not possible to delay, supportive care

Delay transplant; consider ribavirin if delay is not feasible (anecdotal data)

Metapneumovirus

Delay transplant if possible

Delay transplant; no data on ribavirin

Rhinovirus

No delay needed for URTI

Delay transplant for allogeneic transplant if feasible

Coronavirus

No data

No data

Bocavirus

No data

No data

Adapted from Waghmare et al. [163]

Orthomyxovirus: Influenza

Influenza belongs to the family Orthomyxoviridae with three types, influenza A, influenza, B, and influenza C virus. Influenza A viruses are further classified into subtypes based on their hemagglutinins (HA) and neuraminidases (NA). One of the unique features of influenza virus is the frequency by which antigenic variation occurs which is the reason that influenza continues to be a cause of major epidemics. Annual variation of the influenza virus is due to relatively minor antigenic changes within the HA and/or NA and is known as antigenic drift. Major changes in HA or NA through genetic reassortment or a major mutation are known as antigenic shift and occur once every 10–30 years. This results in an entirely novel strain to which the population has no immunity, leading to an unhindered global spread; the last pandemic occurred in 2009 with the emergence of a novel strain of influenza A/H1N1.

Epidemiology

Influenza is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients. In recipients of solid organ transplantation, up to 42% of URTIs and 48% of LRTIs may be due to influenza infection and the annual between 1% and 4% [164]. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, mortality rates ranged from 0 to 8% in most case series [4] although one study reported a mortality rate of 21% among lung transplant recipients [165]. Of the organ transplants, lung transplant recipients appear to be at the highest risk; in one study, the incidence of influenza was 10–15 times higher in recipients of lung transplantation compared with recipients of other solid organs such as kidney or liver [166].

The incidence of influenza among HSCT ranges between 1% and 4% with 7–44% of such patients may develop LRTI. Death rates associated with influenza in HSCT recipients are higher than in SOT. Among patients with LRTI, mortality rates ranged from 15% to 28% and case fatality rates during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic ranged from 0 to 38% [4]. The main risk factor for disease progression to LRTI was lymphopenia; allogeneic HSCT, infection during early post-transplant period, presence of graft-versus-host disease, myeloablative preparatory regimen, and delayed initiation of antiviral therapy were other risk factors [1, 11, 12, 167]. Of interest, concomitant corticosteroid use has not been associated with an increased risk for progression to LRTI, a need for mechanical ventilation, or infection associated death; however, patients given systemic higher doses (≥1 mg/kg) of corticosteroids may be predisposed to prolonged viral shedding [11, 168]. The potential role of corticosteroids in influencing risk of progression to LRTI and mortality of influenza and other respiratory viral infections is summarized in Table 40.2 [163].
Table 40.2

Role of corticosteroid treatment in progression of respiratory viral illnesses

 

Progression

Mortality

Virus

Steroid dose per day

 

HR (95% CI)

P-value

Steroid dose per day

 

HR (95% CI)

P-value

RSV

>2 mg/kg

+

1.4 (0.4–5.2)

0.193

>2 mg/kg

+ + +

3.3 (1.7–6.3)

<0.00111

Influenza

≥1 mg/kg

+/−

0.8 (0.2–2.4)

0.6046

≥1 mg/kg

+/−

1.1 (0.3–3.5)

0.8746

PIV

>2 mg/kg

+ + +

4.6 (1.2–17.0)

0.0274

>2 mg/kg

+ + +

3.2 (1.5–7.2)

0.00413

HMPV or RSV

No data

Any steroid

+ + +

5.0 (1.8–14)

0.00216

≥1 mg/kg

+ + + +

7.1 (2.3–22)

<0.00116

Adapted from Waghmare et al. [163]

RSV respiratory syncytial virus, PIV parainfluenza virus, HMPV human metapneumovirus, HR hazard ratio

Clinical Manifestations

Clinical manifestations of influenza are similar to those in immunocompetent patients. In a multicenter cohort study of 242 organ transplant patients during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, the most common presenting symptoms were cough (91%), fever (85%), myalgias (51%), gastrointestinal symptoms (44%), rhinorrhea (43%), and sore throat (43%) [169]. In a multicenter cohort study of 286 HSCT recipients during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, the most common presenting symptoms were cough (85%), fever (81%), rhinorrhea (49%), myalgias (29%), and sore throat (23%) [170]. However, atypical presentations may occur in those with significant immunosuppression, which may include fever as the only presenting symptom or afebrile patient with rhinorrhea alone. It is speculated that corticosteroid use and blunting of the cytokine response associated with acute influenza infection in these patients may contribute to the reduction or absence of systemic symptoms in selected patients.

The primary complication of influenza infection in transplant patients is progression from URTI to LRTI which can lead to acute lung injury and death. Morbidity and mortality appear to be greatest among HSCT and lung transplant recipients. While diffuse or peribronchial ground-glass opacity is the typical radiographic appearance in patients with LRTI, centrilobular nodules and frank lower lobe consolidation can also be observed [171]. Coinfection with other viral, bacterial, or fungal pathogens may occur and was reported in 29% of patients in a multicenter study of SOT recipients with pandemic influenza A/H1N1 [172]. Compared to those with viral co-pathogens, patients with bacterial or fungal coinfections had worse outcomes [11, 172]. Although uncommon, influenza can also a cause a variety of extrapulmonary complications including myocarditis, myositis, encephalopathy, renal failure, severe diarrhea, and pneumomediastinum [166, 173, 174]. Virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome has been reported as a severe complication of pandemic H1N1 leading to multiorgan failure [175]. As discussed previously, several studies suggest an association between RVIs including influenza and allograft rejection/BOS in the case of lung transplants, while others have not; a prospective study is needed to better characterize the impact of these infections on long-term sequelae [19, 44, 172, 176].

In healthy adults, seasonal influenza virus shedding ranges from 5 to 7 days and may extend beyond 1 week in hospitalized patients [177, 178] and even longer in transplant recipients. The median duration of viral shedding among allogeneic HSCT recipients was between 11 and 12 days compared to 1 week among recipients of autologous transplants [11, 179]. Prolonged viral shedding beyond 2 weeks and, in some cases, for months has been described in HSCT recipient. Risk factors for prolonged viral shedding include the use of corticosteroids at dosages ≥1 mg/kg per day and use of bone marrow and cord blood versus peripheral blood stem cell.

Diagnosis

There are several methods available for detection of influenza including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence antibody (DFA), viral culture, and PCR. As for other respiratory viruses, molecular tests have largely replaced these other testing modalities. In a study evaluating test characteristics of four different diagnostic assays during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, PCR was found to have the greatest sensitivity and specificity. Given their improved sensitivity and specificity over other methods, PCR or other nucleic acid-based detection assays are preferred for the diagnosis of influenza infection in this susceptible patient population. Multiplex PCRs have the added advantage of identifying other causes of respiratory viral infections as well.

Treatment

Currently, there are two major classes of antiviral agents with activity against influenza: adamantanes which block the viral M2 protein ion channel, thereby preventing fusion of the virus with host cell membranes, and neuraminidase inhibitors which prevent the release of progeny virus from infected cells. While the adamantanes, amantadine, and rimantadine are only active against influenza A, the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir are active against both influenza A and B viruses, although reduced effectiveness of oseltamivir has occasionally been reported for influenza B virus [180]. The development of resistance to the adamantanes among influenza A virus has substantially limited their utility in clinical practice. Although 2008–2009 seasonal H1N1 remained susceptible to the adamantanes, resistance emerged among seasonal H3N2 in 2003 and was widespread among 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses. Oseltamivir resistance first emerged in 2007 among seasonal H1N1 viruses and was described during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [181]. Oseltamivir resistance is primarily conferred by the H275Y mutation which does not result in cross-resistance to zanamivir. PCR testing is available for the detection of the H275Y mutation. In 2010, the S247 N mutation was detected in strains of 2009 pandemic H1N1 collected in Asia and was found to confer low to moderate oseltamivir and zanamivir resistance [182]. Otherwise, there has been very little zanamivir resistance reported to date, and thus, it is recommended for the treatment of oseltamivir-resistant influenza infection.

Because resistance patterns evolve over time, clinicians should become familiar with local patterns of influenza circulation in their communities throughout each influenza season and refer to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) influenza website (http://www.cdc.gov/flu) [183] for updated information regarding antiviral resistance and recommendations regarding antiviral use. In addition, antiviral resistance appears to occur more commonly among severely immunocompromised patients likely due to prolonged viral shedding [184, 185]. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, the majority of patients with oseltamivir-resistant virus reported to the CDC were HSCT recipients or patients who had a hematologic malignancy receiving chemo- or immunosuppressive therapy [186].

There have been no randomized clinical trials of antiviral therapy for influenza in transplant patients. All randomized trials have included healthy adult outpatients who were treated within 48 h after symptom onset and, in aggregate, demonstrate a reduction in duration of symptoms by ~1 day and time to return to normal activity [180]. Although further study is needed regarding the role of antiviral therapy >48 h of symptom onset, the 2009 IDSA guidelines for management of seasonal influenza suggest that antiviral therapy initiated >48 h after symptom onset may be beneficial in hospitalized patients based on a prospective cohort study [167, 180, 187]. Observational studies suggest that early antiviral therapy of HSCT recipients with influenza URTI is effective in preventing progression to LRTI [8, 11, 168, 179, 188]. Among SOT recipients, a multicenter study found that early antiviral therapy was associated with a lower incidence of hospitalization and likelihood of ICU admission as compared to delayed (>48 h after symptom onset) therapy [169]. Although antiviral therapy may have its greatest value when initiated early, it is felt that symptomatic transplant patients may benefit even beyond 48 h if they have evidence of viral replication, and in general, treatment of all symptomatic transplant patients is recommended regardless of the duration of symptoms [189, 190, 191].

The optimal dose and duration of antiviral therapy in transplant patients has not been established. Oseltamivir has been studied at doses of 75 mg or 150 mg twice daily in immunocompetent patients with seasonal influenza; there was no significant advantage of the higher dose although a slightly higher rate of adverse effects was observed [192, 193]. However, due to concerns over higher viral loads, prolonged viral shedding, and uncertain drug absorption particularly in those patients undergoing chemotherapy or with gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, some experts suggest using the higher dose in transplant patients particularly if absorption is uncertain, in those patients with severe LRTI or who are critically ill [189, 190, 191]. Based on clinical studies in healthy adults, the recommended duration of treatment of influenza in immunocompetent patients is 5 days [180]. However, transplant patients may need longer durations of therapy due to prolonged viral shedding. Some experts recommend treating all SOT recipients until viral replication has ceased; authors recommend checking PCR once a week and treat until negative [190, 191]. Others have suggested a 10-day course for HSCT recipients and extending treatment in those patients with pneumonia, ongoing symptoms, or viral shedding [189]. Resistance testing should be considered in those patients with persistent viral shedding or who progress despite antiviral therapy.

While most literature in transplant recipients has focused on oseltamivir, inhaled zanamivir appears to be a reasonable alternative. IV zanamivir is currently available for compassionate use, and there is limited published experience among transplant recipients where it has been used with some benefit among patients with oseltamivir-resistant influenza or severe disease [194].

Peramivir, a parenteral neuraminidase inhibitor, was FDA approved in 2014 for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza infection in adults who have been ill for ≤2 days. There are limited data regarding the use of peramivir in transplant recipients. Of note, the H275Y mutation which confers oseltamivir resistance also confers cross-resistance to peramivir.

There are currently no data that indicates a clear clinical benefit of combination antiviral therapy over single drug therapy. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial found that combination antiviral therapy with oseltamivir, amantadine and ribavirin reduced day 3 viral shedding compared to oseltamivir monotherapy, but there was no difference in clinical outcomes including resolution of symptoms or fever or time to recovery after illness [195].

Table 40.3 summarizes antiviral options for treatment of influenza.
Table 40.3

Antiviral options for the treatment of influenza

Antiviral agent

Dose

Parenteral formulation?

Side effects

Remarks

Oseltamivir

75 mg PO twice daily

Yes, investigational

Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea

Neurologic: confusion, delirium, depressed consciousness (mostly reported among Japanese adolescents and adults)

Some experts recommend higher doses (150 mg PO BID) in transplant patients who are critically ill with LRTI

Zanamivir

2 puffs (10 mg) inhaled twice daily

Yes, investigational

Bronchospasm, cough, headache, dizziness, sinusitis, nausea, diarrhea

Little cross-resistance with oseltamivir

Peramivir

600 mg IV once daily

Yes (only available as parenteral formulation)

Gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea

Neutropenia

Cross-resistance with oseltamivir exists.

Amantadine

100 mg PO twice daily

No

Neurologic: insomnia, lethargy, inability to concentrate, dizziness

Gastrointestinal: nausea

No longer routinely recommended due to high incidence of resistant influenza unless circulating strain known to be susceptible

Rimantadine

100 mg PO twice daily

No

Gastrointestinal

Neurologic (less common than amantadine): lightheadedness, insomnia, inability to concentrate, nervousness

No longer routinely recommended due to high incidence of resistant influenza unless circulating strain known to be susceptible

Prevention

Annual influenza vaccination is a key component of infection prevention among HSCT and SOT recipients. There are several types of influenza vaccines: standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV), available either as a trivalent or quadrivalent injection, high-dose IIV (available as a trivalent injection), live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), intradermal IIV, and recombinant egg-free IIV. All vaccines are modified annually based on the anticipated circulating strains during the upcoming influenza season. The LAIV is contraindicated in immunocompromised patients and should not be used in transplant recipients. The intradermal IIV has not been evaluated in transplant recipients.

For HSCT recipients, influenza vaccination is recommended ≥6 months post-transplant and beginning 4 months following transplant if there is a community influenza outbreak [196]. If the vaccine is administered earlier than 6 months after HSCT, a second dose should be considered. The timing of vaccine administration appears to predict response with one study demonstrating that influenza immunization at least 6 months after HCT was 80% effective in preventing influenza [197]. The high-dose trivalent IIV is FDA approved for individuals ≥65 years of age and was found in a multicenter randomized clinical trial to induce higher antibody responses and improved protection against influenza compared to standard dose IIV [198]. In a phase I trial, HSCT recipients randomized to receive high-dose trivalent IIV had evidence of greater immunogenicity when compared to those receiving standard-dose trivalent IIV [199]. There was a higher frequency of injection site reactions, but most were mild. There are ongoing studies to further evaluate the role of high-dose IIV in HSCT.

For SOT recipients, influenza vaccination is recommended 3–6 months after transplant [164]. The immunogenicity of influenza vaccine following SOT is variable depending on the type of transplant, time from transplant, and immunosuppressive regimens. Among SOT recipients, overall responses based on seroprotection or seroconversion have ranged from 15% to 93% with greater responses observed several years after kidney transplant and lower responses seen in lung transplant [164]. Although there is a theoretical concern that influenza immunization may be associated with early allograft rejection or allosensitization of patients after transplant, this has not been observed in clinical trials [200]. In a randomized, double-blind trial of 172 SOT recipients, high-dose influenza vaccine demonstrated significantly better immunogenicity than the standard-dose vaccine [201]; no increased risk of rejection was reported although the study was not powered to address this outcome.

Immunization of health care workers and household contacts of transplant recipients is a critical component of influenza prevention and is strongly recommended in published guidelines [147, 164]. A systematic review suggests that vaccination of healthcare workers reduces influenza-like illness and all-cause mortality in the elderly [202]. Due to the theoretical risk of transmission of LAIV, the CDC recommends that IIV not be used for household members and health care workers who have close contact with severely immunosuppressed patients such as recipient of hematopoietic stem cell allograft transplantation during those periods in which the patient requires care in a protective environment. Those persons who receive LAIV should avoid providing care for and contact with such patients for 7 days after vaccination.

Although influenza vaccination is the primary tool for influenza prevention, antiviral chemoprophylaxis may be considered as a prevention strategy in selected situations. The 2009 IDSA Guidelines for Management of Seasonal Influenza recommends consideration of antiviral chemoprophylaxis in high-risk patients during the 2 weeks after vaccination before an adequate immune response develops if influenza is circulating in the community [180]. It should also be considered among transplant recipients following exposure within the previous 48 h to an individual with influenza, particularly among those for whom the vaccine is contraindicated, unavailable, or expected to have low effectiveness such as patients with severe immune suppression. The choice of chemoprophylactic agent depends on the susceptibility pattern of the circulating influenza strain.

Human Coronaviruses (HCoV) and Human Rhinoviruses (HRV)

Epidemiology

HRVs and HCoVs are also common causes of RVIs in human, classified into the Picornaviridiae family (genus Enterovirus) and the Coronaviriae family, respectively. Approximately 100 serotypes of HRV have been identified. In comparison, HCoV-229E and HCoV-OC43 were the only two known HCoVs for >40 years. In 2004, a new HCoV was identified as the causative agent of the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and was named SARS-CoV. Subsequently, two other new HCoVs, NL63 and HKU1, were discovered in 2004 and 2005, respectively. In the latter part of 2012, another novel CoV was identified as the cause of severe respiratory illness in two adults from the Middle East [203] and was termed Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Similar to SARS-CoV, this virus can also cause severe, life-threatening disease. The ability of these emerging HCoVs to cause major outbreaks can be a potential threat to global public health and economy [204].

HCoV and HRV in Transplantation

In immunocompetent hosts, HRVs and HCoVs usually cause URTIs, but HCoVs can also cause croup, wheezing, as well as pneumonia, which can be severe with significant mortality, as in the case of SARS. The significance of HRV and HCoV in transplant populations has not been well established. According to a prospective study of HSCT recipients [5], infection with these viruses appears common in the first 100 days after allogeneic transplant, with day 100 cumulative incidence estimated as 22% for HRV and 11% for HCoV. HRV infection was associated with URTI signs and symptoms, but HCoV infection was asymptomatic. More than half of the infected patients had prolonged viral shedding for more than 3 weeks, and about 13% shed virus for more than 3 months [5]; only a few patients developed LRTI in that study. Fatal pneumonia associated with HRV and HCoV have been reported among HSCT recipients [205, 206, 207]. Recent studies suggested that HRV and HCoV LRTI with viral detection in the BAL are associated with mortality rates similar to those seen with RSV, PIV, or influenza viruses [10, 208].

For SOT, HRV and HCoV are frequently isolated among lung transplant patients [23, 25, 28], but a majority of these patients can be asymptomatic, according to a prospective surveillance study [28]. As discussed previously, RVI can increase the risk for developing acute rejection and/or BOS even with asymptomatic infections [23, 25, 28], but whether HRV or HCoV infection confer the same level of risk as compared to the paramyxoviruses or influenza cannot be delineated from these studies.

Currently, there are no specific agents licensed for the treatment of HRV and HCoV, but antiviral therapy for enteroviruses is under intense research.

Conclusions and Future Directions

Respiratory viral infections are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cells and solid organ transplantation. The optimal management of these infections is limited by insufficient randomized treatment data as well as a limited new and novel antiviral drugs being investigated for potential clinical use. Large, preferably multicenter prospective, randomized trials are essential to (1) assess preferred therapy for life-threatening infections such as RSV, (2) define the role of combination antivirals for influenza virus infections, and (3) determine the use of adjunctive immunomodulatory therapy and/or corticosteroids in the management of these infections among the highly susceptible transplant population. The evaluation of novel long-lasting potent monoclonal antibodies for prevention may be warranted.

References

  1. 1.
    Schiffer JT, Kirby K, Sandmaier B, Storb R, Corey L, Boeckh M. Timing and severity of community acquired respiratory virus infections after myeloablative versus non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2009;94:1101–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T, Davis C, Boeckh M. Parainfluenza virus infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, response to antiviral therapy, and effect on transplant outcome. Blood. 2001;98:573–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weinberg A, Lyu DM, Li S, Marquesen J, Zamora MR. Incidence and morbidity of human metapneumovirus and other community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12:330–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renaud C, Campbell AP. Changing epidemiology of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:333–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milano F, Campbell AP, Guthrie KA, et al. Human rhinovirus and coronavirus detection among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Blood. 2010;115:2088–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nichols WG, Gooley T, Boeckh M. Community-acquired respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(Suppl):11S–5S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champlin RE, Whimbey E. Community respiratory virus infections in bone marrow transplant recipients: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(Suppl):8S–10S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chemaly RF, Ghosh S, Bodey GP, et al. Respiratory viral infections in adults with hematologic malignancies and human stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study at a major cancer center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85:278–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whimbey E, Champlin RE, Couch RB, et al. Community respiratory virus infections among hospitalized adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:778–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seo S, Waghmare A, Scott EM, et al. Human rhinovirus detection in the lower respiratory tract of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: association with mortality. Haematologica. 2017;102:1120–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, mortality, and the effect of antiviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1300–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ljungman P, Ward KN, Crooks BN, et al. Respiratory virus infections after stem cell transplantation: a prospective study from the infectious diseases working party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28:479–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim YJ, Guthrie KA, Waghmare A, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: factors determining progression to lower respiratory tract disease. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:1195–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seo S, Xie H, Leisenring WM, et al. Risk factors for parainfluenza virus lower respiratory tract disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(1):163–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Ariza-Heredia EJ, et al. Immunodeficiency scoring index to predict poor outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with RSV infections. Blood. 2014;123:3263–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Billings JL, Hertz MI, Wendt CH. Community respiratory virus infections following lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2001;3:138–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palmer SM Jr, Henshaw NG, Howell DN, Miller SE, Davis RD, Tapson VF. Community respiratory viral infection in adult lung transplant recipients. Chest. 1998;113:944–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vilchez R, McCurry K, Dauber J, et al. Influenza and parainfluenza respiratory viral infection requiring admission in adult lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2002;73:1075–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopez-Medrano F, Aguado JM, Lizasoain M, et al. Clinical implications of respiratory virus infections in solid organ transplant recipients: a prospective study. Transplantation. 2007;84:851–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dudek AZ, Mahaseth H, DeFor TE, Weisdorf DJ. Bronchiolitis obliterans in chronic graft-versus-host disease: analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:657–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belperio JA, Lake K, Tazelaar H, Keane MP, Strieter RM, Lynch JP 3rd. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome complicating lung or heart-lung transplantation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;24:499–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fishman JA. Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2601–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gottlieb J, Schulz TF, Welte T, et al. Community-acquired respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipients: a single season cohort study. Transplantation. 2009;87:1530–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khalifah AP, Hachem RR, Chakinala MM, et al. Respiratory viral infections are a distinct risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and death. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:181–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar D, Erdman D, Keshavjee S, et al. Clinical impact of community-acquired respiratory viruses on bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplant. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2031–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Milstone AP, Brumble LM, Barnes J, et al. A single-season prospective study of respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipients. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:131–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Husain S, Singh N. Bronchiolitis obliterans and lung transplantation: evidence for an infectious etiology. Semin Respir Infect. 2002;17:310–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar D, Husain S, Chen MH, et al. A prospective molecular surveillance study evaluating the clinical impact of community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2010;89:1028–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu V, Dhillon GS, Weill D. A multi-drug regimen for respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus infections in adult lung and heart-lung transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12:38–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fisher CE, Preiksaitis CM, Lease ED, et al. Symptomatic respiratory virus infection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:313–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Erard V, Chien JW, Kim HW, et al. Airflow decline after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: the role of community respiratory viruses. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1619–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Versluys AB, Rossen JW, van Ewijk B, Schuurman R, Bierings MB, Boelens JJ. Strong association between respiratory viral infection early after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the development of life-threatening acute and chronic alloimmune lung syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:782–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Au BK, Au MA, Chien JW. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome epidemiology after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1072–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chien JW, Duncan S, Williams KM, Pavletic SZ. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-an increasingly recognized manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:S106–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gerna G, Vitulo P, Rovida F, et al. Impact of human metapneumovirus and human cytomegalovirus versus other respiratory viruses on the lower respiratory tract infections of lung transplant recipients. J Med Virol. 2006;78:408–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Larcher C, Geltner C, Fischer H, Nachbaur D, Muller LC, Huemer HP. Human metapneumovirus infection in lung transplant recipients: clinical presentation and epidemiology. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1891–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McCurdy LH, Milstone A, Dummer S. Clinical features and outcomes of paramyxoviral infection in lung transplant recipients treated with ribavirin. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22:745–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hall CB. Respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1917–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boyce TG, Mellen BG, Mitchel EF Jr, Wright PF, Griffin MR. Rates of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection among children in medicaid. J Pediatr. 2000;137:865–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Duncan CB, Walsh EE, Peterson DR, Lee FE, Falsey AR. Risk factors for respiratory failure associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1242–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walsh EE, Peterson DR, Falsey AR. Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly persons. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:233–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    CDC. Respiratory syncytial virus activity – United States, July 2008-December 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:230–3.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hall CB, Long CE, Schnabel KC. Respiratory syncytial virus infections in previously healthy working adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:792–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kim YJ, Boeckh M, Englund JA. Community respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients: hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, and individuals with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;28:222–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weigt SS, Gregson AL, Deng JC, Lynch JP 3rd, Belperio JA. Respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32:471–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boeckh M. The challenge of respiratory virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Br J Haematol. 2008;143:455–67.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shah JN, Chemaly RF. Management of RSV infections in adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2011;117:2755–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hynicka LM, Ensor CR. Prophylaxis and treatment of respiratory syncytial virus in adult immunocompromised patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46:558–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waghmare A, Xie H, Kimball L, et al. Supplemental oxygen-free days in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:1235–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anderson NW, Binnicker MJ, Harris DM, et al. Morbidity and mortality among patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection: a 2-year retrospective review. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:367–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Foolad F, Aitken SL, Shigle TL, et al. Oral versus aerosolized ribavirin for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy760. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pilie P, Werbel WA, Riddell J, Shu X, Schaubel D, Gregg KS. Adult patients with respiratory syncytial virus infection: impact of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on outcomes. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17:551–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Waghmare A, Campbell AP, Xie H, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: viral RNA detection in blood, antiviral treatment, and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1731–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shah DP, Ghantoji SS, Shah JN, et al. Impact of aerosolized ribavirin on mortality in 280 allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1872–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Martino R, Porras RP, Rabella N, et al. Prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and outcome of symptomatic upper and lower respiratory tract infections by respiratory viruses in adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:781–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ghosh S, Champlin RE, Englund J, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract illnesses in adult blood and marrow transplant recipients: combination therapy with aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25:751–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ariza-Heredia EJ, Fishman JE, Cleary T, Smith L, Razonable RR, Abbo L. Clinical and radiological features of respiratory syncytial virus in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14:64–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Uckay I, Gasche-Soccal PM, Kaiser L, et al. Low incidence of severe respiratory syncytial virus infections in lung transplant recipients despite the absence of specific therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:299–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hall CB, McBride JT, Walsh EE, et al. Aerosolized ribavirin treatment of infants with respiratory syncytial viral infection. A randomized double-blind study. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1443–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Graci JD, Cameron CE. Quasispecies, error catastrophe, and the antiviral activity of ribavirin. Virology. 2002;298:175–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tam RC, Lau JY, Hong Z. Mechanisms of action of ribavirin in antiviral therapies. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2001;12:261–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sookoian S, Castano G, Flichman D, Cello J. Effects of ribavirin on cytokine production of recall antigens and phytohemaglutinin-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. (Inhibitory effects of ribavirin on cytokine production). Ann Hepatol. 2004;3:104–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Englund JA, Piedra PA, Ahn YM, Gilbert BE, Hiatt P. High-dose, short-duration ribavirin aerosol therapy compared with standard ribavirin therapy in children with suspected respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Pediatr. 1994;125:635–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chemaly RF, Hanmod SS, Rathod DB, et al. The characteristics and outcomes of parainfluenza virus infections in 200 patients with leukemia or recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119:2738–45; quiz 969.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chemaly RF, Torres HA, Munsell MF, et al. An adaptive randomized trial of an Intermittent Dosing Schedule of Aerosolized Ribavirin in patients with cancer and respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:1367–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hirsch HH, Martino R, Ward KN, Boeckh M, Einsele H, Ljungman P. Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4): guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of human respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:258–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Newborn AAoPCoIDaCoFa. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections: indications for the use of palivizumab and update on the use of RSV-IGIV. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee of Fetus and Newborn. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1211–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Boeckh M, Berrey MM, Bowden RA, Crawford SW, Balsley J, Corey L. Phase 1 evaluation of the respiratory syncytial virus-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:350–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Boeckh M, Englund J, Li Y, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter trial of aerosolized ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract infection in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:245–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Small TN, Casson A, Malak SF, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29:321–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    McCoy D, Wong E, Kuyumjian AG, Wynd MA, Sebti R, Munk GB. Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adult patients with hematologic malignancies based on an institution-specific guideline. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13:117–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tsitsikas DA, Oakervee H, Cavenagh JD, Gribben J, Agrawal SG, Mattes FM. Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection in haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with aerosolized ribavirin and the humanized monoclonal antibody palivizumab: a single centre experience. Br J Haematol. 2009;146:574–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Seo S, Campbell AP, Xie H, et al. Outcome of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients receiving aerosolized ribavirin: significance of stem cell source and oxygen requirement. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:589–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    de Fontbrune FS, Robin M, Porcher R, et al. Palivizumab treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1019–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Chemaly RF, Aitken SL, Wolfe CR, Jain R, Boeckh MJ. Aerosolized ribavirin: the most expensive drug for pneumonia. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016;18:634–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Khanna N, Widmer AF, Decker M, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients with hematological diseases: single-center study and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:402–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Marcelin JR, Wilson JW, Razonable RR, Mayo Clinic HO. Transplant Infectious Diseases S. Oral ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infections in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16:242–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Trang TP, Whalen M, Hilts-Horeczko A, Doernberg SB, Liu C. Comparative effectiveness of aerosolized versus oral ribavirin for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infections: a single-center retrospective cohort study and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:e12844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Beaird OE, Freifeld A, Ison MG, et al. Current practices for treatment of respiratory syncytial virus and other non-influenza respiratory viruses in high-risk patient populations: a survey of institutions in the Midwestern Respiratory Virus Collaborative. Transpl Infect Dis. 2016;18:210–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Luo YH, Huang CY, Yang KY, Lee YC. Inhaled ribavirin therapy in adult respiratory syncytial virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47:315–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pelaez A, Lyon GM, Force SD, et al. Efficacy of oral ribavirin in lung transplant patients with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:67–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Fuehner T, Dierich M, Duesberg C, et al. Single-centre experience with oral ribavirin in lung transplant recipients with paramyxovirus infections. Antivir Ther. 2011;16:733–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Li L, Avery R, Budev M, Mossad S, Danziger-Isakov L. Oral versus inhaled ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infection after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31(8):839–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Glanville AR, Scott AI, Morton JM, et al. Intravenous ribavirin is a safe and cost-effective treatment for respiratory syncytial virus infection after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:2114–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gottlieb J, Torres F, Haddad T, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in lung transplant (LT) recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:S155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Elizaga J, Olavarria E, Apperley J, Goldman J, Ward K. Parainfluenza virus 3 infection after stem cell transplant: relevance to outcome of rapid diagnosis and ribavirin treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:413–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lewis VA, Champlin R, Englund J, et al. Respiratory disease due to parainfluenza virus in adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1033–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Vilchez RA, Dauber J, McCurry K, Iacono A, Kusne S. Parainfluenza virus infection in adult lung transplant recipients: an emergent clinical syndrome with implications on allograft function. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:116–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Whimbey E, Vartivarian SE, Champlin RE, Elting LS, Luna M, Bodey GP. Parainfluenza virus infection in adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12:699–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Ustun C, Slaby J, Shanley RM, et al. Human parainfluenza virus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, management, mortality, and changes over time. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:1580–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Peck AJ, Englund JA, Kuypers J, et al. Respiratory virus infection among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: evidence for asymptomatic parainfluenza virus infection. Blood. 2007;110:1681–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Billings JL, Hertz MI, Savik K, Wendt CH. Respiratory viruses and chronic rejection in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21:559–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Garbino J, Gerbase MW, Wunderli W, et al. Respiratory viruses and severe lower respiratory tract complications in hospitalized patients. Chest. 2004;125:1033–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Maziarz RT, Sridharan P, Slater S, et al. Control of an outbreak of human parainfluenza virus 3 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:192–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wendt CH, Weisdorf DJ, Jordan MC, Balfour HH Jr, Hertz MI. Parainfluenza virus respiratory infection after bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:921–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chakrabarti S, Collingham KE, Holder K, Fegan CD, Osman H, Milligan DW. Pre-emptive oral ribavirin therapy of paramyxovirus infections after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a pilot study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28:759–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Shima T, Yoshimoto G, Nonami A, et al. Successful treatment of parainfluenza virus 3 pneumonia with oral ribavirin and methylprednisolone in a bone marrow transplant recipient. Int J Hematol. 2008;88:336–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Chakrabarti S, Collingham KE, Holder K, Oyaide S, Pillay D, Milligan DW. Parainfluenza virus type 3 infections in hematopoetic stem cell transplant recipients: response to ribavirin therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1516–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Cobian L, Houston S, Greene J, Sinnott JT. Parainfluenza virus respiratory infection after heart transplantation: successful treatment with ribavirin. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:1040–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wright JJ, O'Driscoll G. Treatment of parainfluenza virus 3 pneumonia in a cardiac transplant recipient with intravenous ribavirin and methylprednisolone. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:343–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Park SY, Sung H, Park KT, et al. Parainfluenza virus 3 pneumonia in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11:333–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Chen YB, Driscoll JP, McAfee SL, et al. Treatment of parainfluenza 3 infection with DAS181 in a patient after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:e77–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Guzman-Suarez BB, Buckley MW, Gilmore ET, et al. Clinical potential of DAS181 for treatment of parainfluenza-3 infections in transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(4):427–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Drozd DR, Limaye AP, Moss RB, et al. DAS181 treatment of severe parainfluenza type 3 pneumonia in a lung transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15:E28–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Chalkias S, Mackenzie MR, Gay C, et al. DAS181 treatment of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with parainfluenza virus lung disease requiring mechanical ventilation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16:141–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Salvatore M, Satlin MJ, Jacobs SE, et al. DAS181 for treatment of Parainfluenza virus infections in Hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients at a single center. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:965–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    van den Hoogen BG, de Jong JC, Groen J, et al. A newly discovered human pneumovirus isolated from young children with respiratory tract disease. Nat Med. 2001;7:719–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kroll JL, Weinberg A. Human metapneumovirus. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32:447–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Biacchesi S, Skiadopoulos MH, Boivin G, et al. Genetic diversity between human metapneumovirus subgroups. Virology. 2003;315:1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Williams JV, Harris PA, Tollefson SJ, et al. Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:443–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Falsey AR. Human metapneumovirus infection in adults. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:S80–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Falsey AR, Erdman D, Anderson LJ, Walsh EE. Human metapneumovirus infections in young and elderly adults. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:785–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Walsh EE, Peterson DR, Falsey AR. Human metapneumovirus infections in adults: another piece of the puzzle. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2489–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Debur MC, Vidal LR, Stroparo E, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12:173–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Englund JA, Boeckh M, Kuypers J, et al. Brief communication: fatal human metapneumovirus infection in stem-cell transplant recipients. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:344–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Williams JV, Martino R, Rabella N, et al. A prospective study comparing human metapneumovirus with other respiratory viruses in adults with hematologic malignancies and respiratory tract infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1061–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Oliveira R, Machado A, Tateno A, Boas LV, Pannuti C, Machado C. Frequency of human metapneumovirus infection in hematopoietic SCT recipients during 3 consecutive years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;42:265–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Shah DP, Shah PK, Azzi JM, El Chaer F, Chemaly RF. Human metapneumovirus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and hematologic malignancy patients: A systematic review. Cancer Lett. 2016;379:100–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Seo S, Gooley TA, Kuypers JM, et al. Human metapneumovirus infections following hematopoietic cell transplantation: Factors associated with disease progression. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:178–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Hopkins P, McNeil K, Kermeen F, et al. Human metapneumovirus in lung transplant recipients and comparison to respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:876–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Wyde PR, Chetty SN, Jewell AM, Boivin G, Piedra PA. Comparison of the inhibition of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus by ribavirin and immune serum globulin in vitro. Antivir Res. 2003;60:51–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Hamelin ME, Prince GA, Boivin G. Effect of ribavirin and glucocorticoid treatment in a mouse model of human metapneumovirus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:774–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Bonney D, Razali H, Turner A, Will A. Successful treatment of human metapneumovirus pneumonia using combination therapy with intravenous ribavirin and immune globulin. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:667–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Shachor-Meyouhas Y, Ben-Barak A, Kassis I. Treatment with oral ribavirin and IVIG of severe human metapneumovirus pneumonia (HMPV) in immune compromised child. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:350–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Shahda S, Carlos WG, Kiel PJ, Khan BA, Hage CA. The human metapneumovirus: a case series and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2011;13:324–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Raza K, Ismailjee SB, Crespo M, et al. Successful outcome of human metapneumovirus (hMPV) pneumonia in a lung transplant recipient treated with intravenous ribavirin. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26:862–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Williams JV, Chen Z, Cseke G, et al. A recombinant human monoclonal antibody to human metapneumovirus fusion protein that neutralizes virus in vitro and is effective therapeutically in vivo. J Virol. 2007;81:8315–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Ulbrandt ND, Ji H, Patel NK, et al. Isolation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies which neutralize human metapneumovirus in vitro and in vivo. J Virol. 2006;80:7799–806.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Deffrasnes C, Hamelin ME, Prince GA, Boivin G. Identification and evaluation of a highly effective fusion inhibitor for human metapneumovirus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:279–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Kanne JP, Godwin JD, Franquet T, Escuissato DL, Muller NL. Viral pneumonia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: high-resolution CT findings. J Thorac Imaging. 2007;22:292–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Ko JP, Shepard JA, Sproule MW, et al. CT manifestations of respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant recipients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:235–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Ferguson PE, Sorrell TC, Bradstock KF, Carr P, Gilroy NM. Parainfluenza virus type 3 Pneumonia in bone marrow transplant recipients: multiple small nodules in high-resolution lung computed tomography scans provide a radiological clue to diagnosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(7):905–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Franquet T, Rodriguez S, Martino R, Salinas T, Gimenez A, Hidalgo A. Human metapneumovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: high-resolution computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:223–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Franquet T, Rodriguez S, Martino R, Gimenez A, Salinas T, Hidalgo A. Thin-section CT findings in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with respiratory virus pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1085–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Escuissato DL, Gasparetto EL, Marchiori E, et al. Pulmonary infections after bone marrow transplantation: high-resolution CT findings in 111 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:608–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Gasparetto EL, Escuissato DL, Marchiori E, Ono S, Frare e Silva RL, Muller NL. High-resolution CT findings of respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia after bone marrow transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1133–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kamboj M, Gerbin M, Huang CK, et al. Clinical characterization of human metapneumovirus infection among patients with cancer. J Infect. 2008;57:464–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Miller WT Jr, Barbosa E Jr, Mickus TJ, Mullin C, Van Deerlin VM, Shiley KT. Chest computed tomographic imaging characteristics of viral acute lower respiratory tract illnesses: a case-control study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35:524–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Shiley KT, Van Deerlin VM, Miller WT Jr. Chest CT features of community-acquired respiratory viral infections in adult inpatients with lower respiratory tract infections. J Thorac Imaging. 2010;25:68–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Mahony JB. Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:716–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Fan J, Henrickson KJ. Rapid diagnosis of human parainfluenza virus type 1 infection by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR-enzyme hybridization assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1914–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Fan J, Henrickson KJ, Savatski LL. Rapid simultaneous diagnosis of infections with respiratory syncytial viruses A and B, influenza viruses A and B, and human parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3 by multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-enzyme hybridization assay (Hexaplex). Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1397–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Kuypers J, Campbell AP, Cent A, Corey L, Boeckh M. Comparison of conventional and molecular detection of respiratory viruses in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11:298–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Mahony JB, Petrich A, Smieja M. Molecular diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011;48:217–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Hammond SP, Gagne LS, Stock SR, et al. Respiratory virus detection in immunocompromised patients with FilmArray respiratory panel compared to conventional methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3216–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Poritz MA, Blaschke AJ, Byington CL, et al. FilmArray, an automated nested multiplex PCR system for multi-pathogen detection: development and application to respiratory tract infection. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26047.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Tomblyn M, Chiller T, Einsele H, et al. Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a global perspective. Preface. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44:453–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr, Schnabel KC, Geiman JM. Infectivity of respiratory syncytial virus by various routes of inoculation. Infect Immun. 1981;33:779–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Jalal H, Bibby DF, Bennett J, et al. Molecular investigations of an outbreak of parainfluenza virus type 3 and respiratory syncytial virus infections in a hematology unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1690–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Kassis C, Champlin RE, Hachem RY, et al. Detection and control of a nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a stem cell transplantation unit: the role of palivizumab. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:1265–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Sydnor ER, Greer A, Budd AP, et al. An outbreak of human parainfluenza virus 3 infection in an outpatient hematopoietic stem cell transplantation clinic. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40(7):601–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Tu CC, Chen LK, Lee YS, et al. An outbreak of human metapneumovirus infection in hospitalized psychiatric adult patients in Taiwan. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41:363–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Nichols WG, Erdman DD, Han A, Zukerman C, Corey L, Boeckh M. Prolonged outbreak of human parainfluenza virus 3 infection in a stem cell transplant outpatient department: insights from molecular epidemiologic analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004;10:58–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, Bridges C, Hajjeh R. Guidelines for preventing health-care--associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53:1–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Yokoe D, Casper C, Dubberke E, et al. Infection prevention and control in health-care facilities in which hematopoietic cell transplant recipients are treated. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44:495–507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
  157. 157.
    Cortez K, Murphy BR, Almeida KN, et al. Immune-globulin prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients undergoing stem-cell transplantation. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:834–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Le Bayon JC, Lina B, Rosa-Calatrava M, Boivin G. Recent developments with live-attenuated recombinant paramyxovirus vaccines. Rev Med Virol. 2013;23(1):15–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Graham BS. Vaccine development for respiratory syncytial virus. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;23:107–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Marquez-Escobar VA. Current developments and prospects on human metapneumovirus vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16:419–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Pawelczyk M, Kowalski ML. The role of human Parainfluenza virus infections in the immunopathology of the respiratory tract. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17:16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Peck AJ, Corey L, Boeckh M. Pretransplantation respiratory syncytial virus infection: impact of a strategy to delay transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:673–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Waghmare A, Englund JA, Boeckh M. How I treat respiratory viral infections in the setting of intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2016;127:2682–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Kumar D, Blumberg EA, Danziger-Isakov L, et al. Influenza vaccination in the organ transplant recipient: review and summary recommendations. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2020–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Ng BJ, Glanville AR, Snell G, et al. The impact of pandemic influenza A H1N1 2009 on Australian lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:568–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Vilchez RA, McCurry K, Dauber J, et al. Influenza virus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:287–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Choi SM, Boudreault AA, Xie H, Englund JA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Differences in clinical outcomes after 2009 influenza A/H1N1 and seasonal influenza among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Blood. 2011;117:5050–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Boudreault AA, Xie H, Leisenring W, Englund J, Corey L, Boeckh M. Impact of corticosteroid treatment and antiviral therapy on clinical outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant patients infected with influenza virus. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:979–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, et al. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:521–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Ljungman P, de la Camara R, Perez-Bercoff L, et al. Outcome of pandemic H1N1 infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Haematologica. 2011;96:1231–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Elicker BM, Schwartz BS, Liu C, et al. Thoracic CT findings of novel influenza A (H1N1) infection in immunocompromised patients. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:299–307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Cordero E, Perez-Romero P, Moreno A, et al. Pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: impact of viral and non-viral co-infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:67–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Lee N, Chan PK, Lui GC, et al. Complications and outcomes of pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in hospitalized adults: how do they differ from those in seasonal influenza? J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1739–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Liu C, Schwartz BS, Vallabhaneni S, et al. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection in patients with hematologic malignancy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1910–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Beutel G, Wiesner O, Eder M, et al. Virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome as a major contributor to death in patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) infection. Crit Care. 2011;15:R80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Vu DL, Bridevaux PO, Aubert JD, Soccal PM, Kaiser L. Respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients: a critical review and pooled analysis of clinical studies. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1071–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Lee N, Chan PK, Hui DS, et al. Viral loads and duration of viral shedding in adult patients hospitalized with influenza. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:492–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Ng S, Cowling BJ, Fang VJ, et al. Effects of oseltamivir treatment on duration of clinical illness and viral shedding and household transmission of influenza virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:707–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Khanna N, Steffen I, Studt JD, et al. Outcome of influenza infections in outpatients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11:100–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Harper SA, Bradley JS, Englund JA, et al. Seasonal influenza in adults and children--diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1003–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Moscona A. Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:953–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Hurt AC, Lee RT, Leang SK, et al. Increased detection in Australia and Singapore of a novel influenza A(H1N1)2009 variant with reduced oseltamivir and zanamivir sensitivity due to a S247N neuraminidase mutation. Euro surveillance: bulletin europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin 2011;16.Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Centers for Disease Control. Flu. www.cdc.gov/flu. Accessed Sept 2018.
  184. 184.
    Ison MG, Gubareva LV, Atmar RL, Treanor J, Hayden FG. Recovery of drug-resistant influenza virus from immunocompromised patients: a case series. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:760–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Weinstock DM, Gubareva LV, Zuccotti G. Prolonged shedding of multidrug-resistant influenza A virus in an immunocompromised patient. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:867–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Graitcer SB, Gubareva L, Kamimoto L, et al. Characteristics of patients with oseltamivir-resistant pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:255–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    McGeer A, Green KA, Plevneshi A, et al. Antiviral therapy and outcomes of influenza requiring hospitalization in Ontario, Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1568–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Machado CM. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:273–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Casper C, Englund J, Boeckh M. How I treat influenza in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2010;115:1331–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Ison MG, Michaels MG. RNA respiratory viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(Suppl 4):S166–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Kumar D, Morris MI, Kotton CN, et al. Guidance on novel influenza A/H1N1 in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:18–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Nicholson KG, Aoki FY, Osterhaus AD, et al. Efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in treatment of acute influenza: a randomised controlled trial. Neuraminidase Inhibitor Flu Treatment Investigator Group. Lancet. 2000;355:1845–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Treanor JJ, Hayden FG, Vrooman PS, et al. Efficacy and safety of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in treating acute influenza: a randomized controlled trial. US Oral Neuraminidase Study Group. JAMA. 2000;283:1016–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Ison MG. Influenza prevention and treatment in transplant recipients and immunocompromised hosts. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013;7(Suppl 3):60–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Beigel JH, Bao Y, Beeler J, et al. Oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin combination antiviral therapy versus oseltamivir monotherapy for the treatment of influenza: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:1255–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:e44–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Machado CM, Cardoso MR, da Rocha IF, Boas LS, Dulley FL, Pannuti CS. The benefit of influenza vaccination after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36:897–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:635–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Halasa NB, Savani BN, Asokan I, et al. Randomized double-blind study of the safety and immunogenicity of standard-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine versus high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22:528–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Chong PP, Handler L, Weber DJ. A systematic review of safety and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination strategies in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:1802–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Natori Y, Shiotsuka M, Slomovic J, et al. A double-blind, randomized trial of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccine in adult solid-organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:1698–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Thomas RE, Jefferson T, Lasserson TJ. Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005187.Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    Zaki AM, van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a man with Pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1814–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    de Wit E, van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:523–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Uhlenhaut C, Cohen JI, Pavletic S, et al. Use of a novel virus detection assay to identify coronavirus HKU1 in the lungs of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient with fatal pneumonia. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14:79–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Oosterhof L, Christensen CB, Sengelov H. Fatal lower respiratory tract disease with human corona virus NL63 in an adult haematopoietic cell transplant recipient. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1115–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Gutman JA, Peck AJ, Kuypers J, Boeckh M. Rhinovirus as a cause of fatal lower respiratory tract infection in adult stem cell transplantation patients: a report of two cases. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40:809–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Ogimi C, Waghmare AA, Kuypers JM, et al. Clinical significance of human coronavirus in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1532–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic MedicineStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations