Polymers as Biomaterials

  • Vasif Hasirci
  • Nesrin Hasirci


The chemical reaction in which high molecular weight molecules are formed from monomers is known as polymerization reaction. Polymerization can proceed according to two different mechanisms, chain growth (or addition) and step growth (or condensation) polymerization. A distinction can be made between condensation and addition mechanisms of polymerization; in condensation polymerization, two functional groups bond with each other, generally by releasing a small molecule such as H2O, while in addition polymerization, double bonds of monomers react without releasing any molecule. However, there are some condensation reactions where no molecule release occurs such as polyurethane polymerization. Meanwhile, these two methods are not exclusive; both approaches can be used in the polymerization of the same monomer, or the same polymer can be prepared by two or more different monomers through both of these approaches, as long as suitable groups are available for individual polymerizations. Nylon 6 is a polymer with repeating units ~NH(CH2)5CO- and can be synthesized either from 6-aminocaproic acid by condensation or from caprolactam by addition polymerization [1]. There are also some new polymerization techniques as click polymerization, atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) which became popular in the last decades. In these techniques, some special catalysts and agents are used to obtain specially designed polymers with controlled molecular weights (Fig. 5.1).


  1. 1.
    Helfferich FG (2001) Polymerization. In: Kinetics of homogeneous multistep reactions. Comprehensive chemical kinetics. Elsevier, p 299–354Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV, Sharpless KB (2002) A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective "ligation" of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2596–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pintauer T, Matyjaszewski K (2008) Atom transfer radical addition and polymerization reactions catalyzed by ppm amounts of copper complexes. Chem Soc Rev 37:1087–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowe B, McCormicka CL (2007) Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) radical polymerization and the synthesis of water-soluble (co)polymers under homogeneous conditions in organic and aqueous media. Prog Polym Sci 32:283–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chauvel-Lebret D, Auroy P, Bonnaure-Mallet M (2013) Biocompatibility of elastomers. In: Dumitriu S, Popa V (eds) Polymeric biomaterials, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 415–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grieshaber SE, Jha AK, Farran AJE, Jia X (2011) Hydrogels in tissue engineering. In: Burdick JA, Mauck RL (eds) Biomaterials for tissue engineering applications a review of the past and future trends. Springer, Wien, NewYork, pp 9–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ifkovits JL, Burdick JA (2007) Review: photopolymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng 13(10):2369–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bryant SJ, Nuttelman CR, Anseth KS (2000) Cytocompatibility of UVand visible light photoinitiating systems on cultured NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11:439–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu W, Merrett K, Griffith M, Fagerholm P, Dravida S, Heyne B, Scaiano JC, Watsky MA, Shinozaki N, Lagali N, Munger R, Li F (2008) Recombinant human collagen for tissue engineered corneal substitutes. Biomaterials 29(9):1147–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heeger J (2002) Semiconducting and metallic polymers: the fourth generation of polymeric materials. Synth Met 125:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo LG, Albertsson A-C (2013) Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 38(9):1263–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Subramanian UMK, Sethuraman S (2009) Development of biomaterial scaffold for nerve tissue engineering: Biomaterial mediated neural regeneration. J Biomed Sci 16:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rivers TJ, Hudson TW, Schmidt CE (2002) Synthesis of a novel, biodegradable electrically conducting polymer for biomedical applications. Adv Funct Mater 12(1):33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Z, Rouabhia M, Wang Z, Roberge C, Shi G, Roche P, Li J, Dao LH (2007) Electrically conductive biodegradable polymer composite for nerve regeneration: electricity-stimulated neurite outgrowth and axon regeneration. Artif Organs 31(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 32(8–9):762–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lloyd W (2002) Interfacial bioengineering to enhance surface biocompatibility. Med Device Technol 13:18–21Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li S (1999) Hydrolytic degradation characteristics of aliphatic polyesters derived from lactic and glycolic acids. J Biomed Mater Res 48(3):342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schroeter M, Wildemann B, Lendlein A (2011) Biodegradable materials from protocol to patient. In: Steinhoff G (ed) Regenerative medicine. Springer, New York, pp 469–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Domb J, Khan W (2013) Biodegradable polymers as drug carrier systems. In: Dumitriu S, Popa V (eds) Polymeric biomaterials, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 135–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vieira C, Vieira JC, Ferra JM, Magalhães FD, Guedes RM, Marques AT (2011) Mechanical study of PLA-PCL fibers during in vitro degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(3):451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katti DS, Lakshmi S, Langer R, Laurencin CT (2002) Toxicity, biodegradation and elimination of polyanhydrides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54(7):933–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Albertsson C, Karlsson S (1997) Controlled degradation by artificial and biological processes. In: Hatada K, Kitayama T, Vogl O (eds) Macromolecular design of polymeric materials. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York/Basel/Hong Kong, pp 739–780Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lam XF, Savalani MM, Teoh SH, Hutmacher DW (2008) Dynamics of in vitro polymer degradation of polycaprolactone-based scaffolds: accelerated versus simulated physiological conditions. Biomed Mater 3:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasif Hasirci
    • 1
  • Nesrin Hasirci
    • 2
  1. 1.BIOMATEN Center of Excellence in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, and Department of Biological SciencesMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.BIOMATEN Center of Excellence in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, and Department of ChemistryMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations