Advertisement

Sterilization of Biomaterials

  • Vasif Hasirci
  • Nesrin Hasirci
Chapter

Abstract

Sterilization is a necessary and an important part of the manufacture of any biomaterial because infection is the last thing a patient who has undergone an implant placement surgery needs. This would hamper the healing process, probably make the implant unsuccessful and make the patient incapable of dealing with this additional health problem, while the actual surgery might have been a very serious one such as a cardiovascular implantation. Sterilization is needed because the implants could be carrying harmful microorganisms due the implant production environment being not sufficiently sterile, the operating theater may not be microorganism-free, or the surgical instruments could be contaminated. The solution for the last problem is proper sterilization of the implant. Of course in the operating room, all the instruments used during the operation should also be sterilized. The selection of an appropriate sterilization method is an important issue. The goal of sterilization is to reduce the amount of microorganisms found in the surgical environment and on the devices to an internationally acceptable level. However, the methods used to achieve this could have a significant effect on the physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of a biomaterial and as a result on its performance; therefore care should be exercised in the selection of the correct method of sterilization.

References

  1. 1.
    Courtesy: Piroclave North AmericaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schneider PM (2013) New technologies and trends in sterilization and disinfection. Am J Infect Control 41:S81–S86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wei H, Ca Q, Rahn R, Zhang X, Wang Y, Lebwohl M (1998) DNA structural integrity and base composition affect ultraviolet light-induced oxidative DNA damage. Biochemistry 37:6485–6490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rai R, Tallawi M, Roether JA, Detsch R, Barbani N, Rosellini E, Kaschta J, Schubert DW, Boccaccini AR (2013) Sterilization effects on the physical properties and cytotoxicity of poly(glycerolsebacate). Mater Lett 105:32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xin H, Shepherd DET, Dearn KD (2013) Strength of poly-ether-ether-ketone: effects of sterilisation and thermal ageing. Polym Test 32:1001–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sefat F, McKean R, Deshpande P, Ramachandran C, Hill CJ, Sangwan VS, Ryan AJ, MacNeil S (2013) Production, sterilisation and storage of biodegradable electrospun PLGA membranes for delivery of limbal stem cells to the cornea. Procedia Eng 59:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vetten MA, Yah CS, Singh T, Gulumian M (2014) Challenges facing sterilization and depyrogenation of nanoparticles: effects on structural stability and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine 10(7):1391–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    George KA, Shadforth AMA, Chirila TV, Laurent MJ, Stephenson S-A, Edwards GA, Madden PW, Hutmacher DW, Harkin DG (2013) Effect of the sterilization method on the properties of Bombyx mori silk fibroin films. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manivasagam G, Dhinasekaran D, Rajamanickam A (2010) Biomedical implants: corrosion and its prevention – a review. Recent Pat Corros Sci 2:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korobeynikov MV, Bryazgin AA, Bezuglov VV, Shtarklev EA, Yu Vlasov A, Voronin LA, Tkachenko VO (2016) Radiation treatment of the ceramic and polymer implants. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 110:012108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nam KW, Yoo JJ, Koo K-H, Yoon KS, Kim HJ (2009) Clinical device-related article optimal sterilization method for the zirconia/alumina composites used for total hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90B:962–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell N, Rives A, Bertollo N, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR (2013) The effect of sterilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of paired rabbit cortical bone. J Biomech 46:1670–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghanaati S, Barbeck M, Booms P, Lorenz J, Kirkpatrick CJ, Sader RA (2014) Potential lack of “standardized” processing techniques for production of allogeneic and xenogeneic bone blocks for application in humans. Acta Biomater 10:3557–3562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toh M-R, Chiu GN (2013) Liposomes as sterile preparations and limitations of sterilisation techniques in liposomal manufacturing. Asian J Pharm Sci 8:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasif Hasirci
    • 1
  • Nesrin Hasirci
    • 2
  1. 1.BIOMATEN Center of Excellence in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, and Department of Biological SciencesMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.BIOMATEN Center of Excellence in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, and Department of ChemistryMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations