Instrumentation and Experimental Techniques

Chapter

Abstract

Many of the instrumental requirements for electron diffraction, particularly the needs for small electron probes, will be found to be similar to those for analytical electron microscopy.

Keywords

Magnetic Sector Convergence Angle Energy Filter Focus Probe Condenser Lens 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beche A, Rouviere JL, Clement L, Hartmann JM (2009) Improved precision in strain measurement using nanobeam electron diffraction. Appl Phys Lett 95:123114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benner G, Bihr J et al (1990) A new illumination system for an analytical transmission electron microscope using a condenser objective lens. In: Proceedings of XIIth ICEM Seattle. San Francisco Press, SanFrancisco, pp 138–139Google Scholar
  3. Benner G, Probst W (1994) Köhler illumination in the tem: fundamentals and advantages. J Microsc 174(3):133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger SD, Salisbury IG et al (1987) Electron energy-loss spectroscopy studies of nanometer-scale structures in alumina produced by intense electron-beam irradiation. Philos Mag B 55:341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackman M (1939) On the intensities of electron diffraction rings. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 173:68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botton G (ed) (2007) Analytical electron microscopy. Science of microscopy. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Castaing R, Hennequin JF et al (1967) The magnetic prism as an optical system. In: Septier (ed) Focussing of charged particles. Academic, New York, pp 265–293Google Scholar
  8. Chee SW, Sivaramakrishnan S, Sharma R, Zuo JM (2011) Electron-beam-induced growth of Tio2 nanostructures. Microsc Microanal 17:274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christenson KK, Eades JA (1988) Skew thoughts on parallelism. Ultramicroscopy 26:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowley JM (1993) Configured detectors for STEM imaging of thin specimens. Ultramicroscopy 49:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowley JM (1999) Electron nanodiffraction. Microsc Res Tech 46:75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowley JM (2004) Applications of electron nanodiffraction. Micron 35:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowley JM, Spence JCH (1981) Convergent beam electron microdiffraction from small crystals. Ultramicroscopy 6:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donev EU, Hastings JT (2009) Electron-beam-induced deposition of platinum from a liquid precursor. Nano Lett 9:2715–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorset DL, Zemlin F (1985) Structural changes in electron-irradiated paraffin crystals at < 15 K and their relevance to lattice imaging experiments. Ultramicroscopy 17(3):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downing KH, Glaeser RM (1986) Improvement in high-resolution image quality of radiation-sensitive specimens achieved with reduced spot size of the electron-beam. Ultramicroscopy 20:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duval P, Hoan N et al (1970) Réalisation d’un dispositif de filtrage en énergie des images de microdiffraction électronique. Nouv Rev d’Optique Appliquée 1:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eades JA (1980) Zone-axis patterns formed by a new double-rocking technique. Ultramicroscopy 5:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eades JA (1984) Zone-axis diffraction patterns by the Tanaka method. J Electron Microsc Tech 1:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eades A (2006) Obtaining TEM images with a uniform deviation parameter. Ultramicroscopy 106:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egerton RF (2005) Physical principles of electron microscopy: an introduction to TEM, SEM, and AEM. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Egerton RF (2011) Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the electron microscope, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Egerton RF, Li P et al (2004) Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron 35:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Egerton RF, Wang F et al (2006) Beam-induced damage to thin specimens in an intense electron probe. Microsc Microanal 12:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Enge HA (1967) Deflecting magnets. In: Septier A (ed) Focusing of charged particles. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans JE, Jungjohann KL et al (2011) Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 11:2809–2813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fujimoto F, Fujita H (1972) Radiation damage induced by channeling of high energy electrons. Phys Status Solidi A 11:K103–K104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fung KK (1984) Large-angle convergent-beam zone axis patterns. Ultramicroscopy 12:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giannuzzi LA, Stevie FA (eds) (2005) Introduction to focused ion beams: instrumentation, theory, techniques and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Gjonnes K (1997) On the integration of electron diffraction intensities in the Vincent-Midgley precession technique. Ultramicroscopy 69:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaeser RM, Taylor KA (1978) Radiation damage relative to transmission electron microscopy of biological specimens at low temperature: a review. J Microsc 112:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodhew PJ (1972) Specimen preparation in materials science, North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  33. Gubbens A, Barfels M, Trevor C, Twesten R, Mooney P, Thomas P, Menon N, Kraus B, Mao C, McGinn B (2010) The GIF quantum, a next generation post-column imaging energy filter. Ultramicroscopy 110:962–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henderson R (1995) The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic-resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules. Q Rev Biophys 28:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirsch P, Howie A, Nicolson RB, Pashley DW, Whelan MJ (1977) Electron microscopy of thin crystals. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, MalabaGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobbs LW (1978) Radiation damage in electron microscopy of inorganic solids. Ultramicroscopy 3:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobbs LW (1979) Radiation effects in analysis of inorganic specimens by TEM. In: Hren JJ, Goldstein JI, Joy DC (eds) Introduction to analytical electron microscopy. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Horstmann M, Meyer G (1965) Zeit Fur Physik 182:380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hwang J, Zhang JY, Son J, Stemmer S (2012) Nanoscale quantification of octahedral tilts in perovskite films. Appl Phys Lett 100:191909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1986) Structural instability of ultrafine particles of metals. Phys Rev Lett 56:616–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Isaacson M, Johnson D, Crewe AV (1973) Electron beam excitation and damage of biological molecules; its implications for specimen damage in electron microscopy. Radiat Res 55:205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeng T-W, Chiu W (1984) Quantitative assessment of radiation damage in a thin protein crystal. J Microsc 136:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang N (2016) Beam damage by the induced electric field in transmission electron microscopy. Micron 83:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jiang N, Spence JCH (2012) On the dose-rate threshold of beam damage in TEM. Ultramicroscopy 113:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jiang N, Hembree GG, Spence JCH, Qiu J, de Abajo FJG, Silcox J (2003) Nanoring formation by direct-write inorganic electron-beam lithography. Appl Phys Lett 83:551–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jordan IK, Rossouw CJ, Vincent R (1991) Effects of energy filtering in lacbed patterns. Ultramicroscopy 35(3–4):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jouffrey B (2009) On the high-voltage stem project in Toulouse. In: Advances in imaging and electron physics: cold field emission and the scanning transmission electron microscope. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Kelly PM, Wauchope CJ et al (1994) Calculation of overall tilt angles for a double tilt holder in a TEM. Microsc Res Tech 28:448–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim KH, Xing H, Zuo JM, Zhang P, Wang HF (2015) TEM based high resolution and low-dose scanning electron nanodiffraction technique for nanostructure imaging and analysis. Micron 71:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kolar HR, Spence JCH, Alexander H (1996) Observation of moving dislocation kinks and unpinning. Phys Rev Lett 77:4031–4034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kondo Y, Ito T et al (1984) New electron diffraction techniques using electronic hollow-cone illumination. Jpn J Appl Phys 23:L178–L180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krakow W, Howland LA (1976) A method for producing hollow cone illumination electronically in the conventional transmission microscope. Ultramicroscopy 2:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krivanek OL, Gubbens AJ, Dellby N, Meyer CE (1992) Design and 1st applications of a post column imaging filter. Microsc Microanal Microstruct 3:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krivanek OL, Ursin JP, Bacon NJ, Corbin GJ, Dellby N, Hrncirik P, Murfitt MF, Own CS, Szilagyi ZS (2009) High-energy-resolution monochromator for aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy/electron energy-loss spectroscopy. Philos T Roy Soc A367:3683–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lanio S (1986) High-resolution imaging magnetic energy filters with simple structure. Optik 73:99–107Google Scholar
  56. LeBeau JM, Findlay SD, Allen LJ, Stemmer S (2010) Position averaged convergent beam electron diffraction: theory and applications. Ultramicroscopy 110:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lichte H, Michael L (2008) Electron holography—basics and applications. Rep Prog Phys 71:016102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mayer J, Giannuzzi LA, Kamino T, Michael J (2007) TEM sample preparation and FIB-induced damage. MRS Bull 32:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McKeown J, Spence JCH (2009) The kinematic convergent beam method for solving nanocrystal structures. J Appl Phys 106:074309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morishita S, Yamasaki J, Nakamura K, Kato T, Tanaka N (2008) Diffractive imaging of the dumbbell structure in silicon by spherical-aberration-corrected electron diffraction. Appl Phys Lett 93:183103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morniroli JP (2003) CBED and LACBED analysis of stacking faults and antiphase boundaries. Mater Chem Phys 81:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morniroli JP, Gaillot F (2000) Trace analyses from LACBED patterns. Ultramicroscopy 83:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morniroli JP, Marceau RKW et al (2006) LACBED characterization of dislocation loops. Philos Mag 86:4883–4900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mory C, Colliex C, Cowley JM (1987) Optimum defocus for STEM imaging and microanalysis. Ultramicroscopy 21:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Munro E (1975) Design and optimization of magnetic lenses and deflector systems for electron beams. J Vac Sci Technol 12:1146–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Muray A, Scheinfein M, Isaacson M, Adesida I (1985) Radiolysis and resolution limits of inorganic halide resists. J Vac Sci Technol B 3:367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ou HJ, Cowley JM (1988) The surface-reaction of Pd/MgO studied by scanning reflection electron-microscopy. Phys Status Solidi A 107:719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Own CS, Marks LD, Sinkler W (2005) Electron precession: a guide for implementation. Rev Sci Instrum 76(3):033703Google Scholar
  69. Özdöl VB, Srot V, van Aken PA (2012) Sample preparation techniques for transmission electron microscopy. In: Handbook of nanoscopy. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & CoGoogle Scholar
  70. Perez JP, Sirven J, Sequela A, Lacaze JC (1984) Etude, au premier ordre, d’un systeme dispersif, magnetique, symetrique, de type alpha. J Phys (Paris) 45(C2):171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reimer L (ed) (1995) Energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Reimer L (ed) (1998) Scanning electron microscopy. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Reimer L, Kohl H (2008) Transmission electron microscopy (4th). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  74. Riecke WD, Ruska E (1966) A 100 kV transmission electron microscope with single-field condenser objective. In: 6th international congress for electron microscopy, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  75. Rose H (1978) Aberration correction of homogeneous magnetic deflection systems. Optik 51:15–38Google Scholar
  76. Rose H (1995) In energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy, Edited by L. Reimer. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  77. Rose H, Plies E (1974) Design of a magnetic energy analyzer with small aberrations. Optik 40(3):336–341Google Scholar
  78. Sinclair R, Ponce FA, Yamashita T, Smith DJ, Camps RA, Freeman LA, Erasmus SJ, Nixon WC, Smith KCA, Catto CJD (1982) Dynamic observation of defect annealing in cdte at lattice resolution. Nature 298:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spence JCH, Cowley JM (1978) Lattice imaging in STEM. Optik 50:129–142Google Scholar
  80. Spence JCH, Lynch J (1982) STEM microanalysis by transmission electron-energy loss spectroscopy in crystals. Ultramicroscopy 9:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tafto J, Zhu YM, Wu LJ (1998) A new approach towards measuring structure factors and valence-electron distribution in crystals with large unit cells. Acta Cryst A54:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tanaka M, Terauchi M (1985) Whole pattern in convergent-beam electron diffraction using the hollow-cone beam method. J Electron Microsc 34:52–55Google Scholar
  83. Tanaka M, Saito R, Ueno K, Harada Y (1980) Large-angle convergent-beam electron-diffraction. J Electron Microsc 29:408–412Google Scholar
  84. Tanaka M, Tsuda K, Terauchi M, Tsuno K, Kaneyama T, Honda T, Ishida M (1999) A new 200 kV Ω-filter electron microscope. J Microsc 194:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Terauchi M, Tanaka M (1985) Simultaneous observation of zone-axis pattern and ±g-dark-field pattern in convergent-beam electron-diffraction. J Electron Microsc 34:347–356Google Scholar
  86. Treacy MMJ, Gibson JM (1986) The effects of elastic relaxation on transmission electron-microscopy studies of thinned composition-modulated materials. J Vac Sci Technol B 4:1458–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tsuno K, Kaneyama T, Honda T, Tsuda K, Terauchi M, Tanaka M (1997) Design and testing of omega mode imaging energy filters at 200 kV. J Electron Microsc 46:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tsuno K, Kaneyama T, Honda T, Ishida Y (1999) Design of omega mode imaging energy filters. Nucl Instrum Meth A 427:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Uhlemann S, Rose H (1994) The mandoline filter—a new high-performance imaging filter for sub-eV EFTEM. Optik 96:163–178Google Scholar
  90. Uhlemann S, Rose H (1996) Acceptance of imaging energy filters. Ultramicroscopy 63:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Urban A (1980) Radiation damage in inorganic materials in the electron microscope. Electron Microsc 4:188Google Scholar
  92. Van der Mast KD, Rakels CJ, Le Poole JB (1980) A high quality multipurpose objective lens. In: Proceedings of European congress electron microscope, vol 1. The Hague, pp 72–73Google Scholar
  93. Venkatesan BM, Shah AB, Zuo JM, Bashir R (2010) DNA sensing using nanocrystalline surface-enhanced Al2O3 nanopore sensors. Adv Func Mater 20:1266–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vincent R (1989) Techniques of convergent beam electron-diffraction. J Electron Microsc Tech 13:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vincent R, Midgley PA (1994) Double conical beam-rocking system for measurement of integrated electron-diffraction intensities. Ultramicroscopy 53:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams DB, Carter BC (2009) Transmission electron microscopy, a textbook for materials science, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhu J, Cowley JM (1983) Micro-diffraction from stacking-faults and twin boundaries in fcc crystals. J Appl Crystallogr 16:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zuo JM, Tao J (2011) Scanning electron nanodiffraction and diffraction imaging. In: Pennycook S, Nellist P (eds) Scanning transmission electron microscopy. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Zuo JM, Vartanyants I, Gao M, Zhang R, Nagahara LA (2003) Atomic resolution imaging of a carbon nanotube from diffraction intensities. Science 300:1419–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zuo JM, Gao M, Tao J, Li BQ, Twesten R, Petrov I (2004) Coherent nano-area electron diffraction. Microsc Res Tech 64:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frederick-Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations