Advertisement

Recent Advances on 3D Video Coding Technology: HEVC Standardization Framework

  • Dragorad A. Milovanovic
  • Dragan KukoljEmail author
  • Zoran S. Bojkovic
Chapter

Abstract

3D video is emerging media extension of conventional 2D video into third dimension adding depth sensation and resolving 2D viewing ambiguity. Primary usage scenario for 3D video is to support 3D video applications, where 3D depth perception of a visual scene is provided by a 3D display system. Multiview-plus-depth (MVD) is visual representation and coding format which takes 3D geometry information of acquisition system in the form of distance information. Applications require transmission of jointly encoded multiple synchronized video signals that show the same 3D scene from different viewpoints. Advances in multi-camera arrays and display technology enable new applications for 3D video. It is clear that these applications need to be based on well-defined and -documented technical standards. Recent advances and challenges in development of the 3D video formats and associated coding technologies are summarized in this chapter with focus on undergoing MPEG/ITU standardization framework for 3D extensions of HEVC high-efficiency video encoder. Research on coding efficiency improvement and complexity reduction of 3D-HEVC reference encoder implementation are outlined.

Keywords

Video Code Code Unit Move Picture Expert Group Advanced Video Code Multiview Video 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

Books

  1. Assuncao P, Pinto L, Faria S (2014) Chapter 2: 3D media representation and coding. In: Kondoz A, Dagiuklas T (eds) 3D Future internet media, Springer, pp 9–38Google Scholar
  2. Faria SMM, Debono CJ, Nunes P, Rodrigues NMM (2015) Chapter3: 3D video representation and coding. In: Kondoz A, Dagiuklas T (eds) Novel 3D media technologies. Springer, pp. 25–48Google Scholar
  3. Kondoz A, Dagiuklas T (eds) (2016) Connected 3D media in the Internet era, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. Rao KR, Bojković Z, Milovanović D (2002) Multimedia communication systems: techniques, standards and networks. Prentice Hall PTR (Pearson Education)Google Scholar
  5. Rao KR, Bojković Z, Milovanović D (2005) Introduction to multimedia communication: applications, middleware, networking. WileyGoogle Scholar
  6. Leonardo C (ed) (2012) The MPEG representation of digital media. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. Wien M (2015) High efficiency video coding: coding tools and specification. Springer Signals Commun Technol. (Chapter 12 extensions to HEVC, pp 291–308)Google Scholar
  8. Möller S, Raake A (2014) Quality of experience: advanced concepts, applications and methods. Springer. (Lebreton P, Barkowsky M, Raake A, Le Callet P. Chapter 20: 3D video, pp 299–313)Google Scholar
  9. Zhu C, Zhao Y, Yu L, Tanimoto M (2013) 3D-TV system with depth-image-based rendering: architectures, techniques and challenges, Springer. (Müller K, Merkle P, Tech G. Chapter 8: 3D video compression, pp 223–248)Google Scholar
  10. Dufaux F, Pesquet-Popesu B, Cagnazzo M (eds) (2013) Emerging technologies for 3D video: creation, coding, transmission and rendering. Wiley. (Cagnazzo M, Pesquet-Popescu B, Dufaux F. Chapter 6: 3D video representation and formats, pp 102–120) (Vetro A, Müller K. Chapter 8: depth-based 3D video formats and coding technology, pp 139–161)Google Scholar
  11. Zatt B, Shafique M, Bampi S, Henkel J (2013) 3D video coding for embedded devices: energy efficient algorithms and architectures. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. Ozaktas HM, Onural L (eds) (2007) Three-dimensional television: capture, transmission, and display. Springer. (Smolic A, Merkle P, Müller K, Fehn C, Kauff P, Wiegand T. Chapter 9: compression of multi-view video and associated data, pp 313–350)Google Scholar
  13. Schreer O, Kauff P, Sikora T (eds) (2005) 3D video communication algorithms, concepts and real-time systems in human centered communication. Wiley. (Smolic A, Sikora T. Chapter 11: coding and standardization, pp 193–216)Google Scholar

Journals

  1. (2014) Advances in 3D video processing. J Vis Comm Image Represent 25(4)Google Scholar
  2. (2014) Special issue on QoE in 2D/3D video systems. J Vis Comm Image Represent 25(3)Google Scholar
  3. (2013) Special section on 3D video representation, compression, and rendering. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9)Google Scholar
  4. (2011) Special issue 3D media and displays. Proc IEEE 99(4)Google Scholar
  5. (2007) Special issue on 3DTV. Signal Process Image Comm. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  6. (2007) Special issue in Multiview imaging and 3DTV. IEEE Signal Process MagGoogle Scholar
  7. (2007) Special issue on Multiview video coding and 3DTV. IEEE Tran CSVTGoogle Scholar
  8. (2008) Special issue on 3DTV: capture, transmission and display of 3D video. EURASIP J Adv Signal ProcessGoogle Scholar

B1. Introduction

  1. Sullivan G, Wiegand T (2005) Video compression—from concepts to H.264/AVC standard. Proc IEEE 93(1):18–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 Doc. N13364 (2013) White paper on state of the art in compression and transmission of 3D video. MPEG 103. Meeting, Geneva CHGoogle Scholar

B2. Three-Dimensional Video Formats and Associated Compression Technology

  1. Müller K, Merkle P, Wiegand T (2011) 3-D video representation using depth maps. Proc IEEE 99(4):643–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Vetro A, Wiegand T, Sullivan G (2011) Overview of the stereo and multiview video coding extensions of the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC standard. Proc IEEE 99(4):626–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Wiegand T, Sullivan GJ, Bjøntegaard G, Luthra A (2003) Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 13(7):560–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Sullivan G, Ohm J-R, Han W-J, Wiegand T (2012) Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Trans CSVT 22(12):1649–1668Google Scholar
  5. Ohm JR, Sullivan GJ, Schwarz H, Tan TK, Wiegand T (2012) Comparison of the coding efficiency of video coding standards—including high efficiency video coding (HEVC). IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 22(12):1669–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossen F, Bros B, Suhring K, Flynn D (2012) HEVC complexity and implementation analysis. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 22(12):1685–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sullivan GJ, Boyce J, Chen Y, Ohm J-R (2013) Standardized extensions of high efficiency video coding (HEVC). IEEE J Selected Topics Signal Process 7:1001–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B3. HEVC Standardization Framework

  1. Chen Y, Vetro A (2014) Next-generation 3D formats with depth map support. IEEE Multimedia 21(2):90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hannuksela MM, Rusanovskyy D, Su W, Chen L, Li R, Aflaki P, Lan D, Joachimiak M, Li H, Gabbouj M (2013) Multiview-video-plus-depth coding based on the advanced video coding standard. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9):3449–3458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Müller K, Schwarz H, Marpe D, Bartnik C, Bosse S, Brust H, Hinz T, Lakshman H, Merkle P, Rhee FH, Tech G, Winken M, Wiegand T (2013) 3D high-efficiency video coding for multi-view video and depth data. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9):3366–3378MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Domanski M, Stankiewicz O, Wegner K, Kurc M, Konieczny J, Siast J, Stankowski J, Ratajczak R, Grajek T (2013) High efficiency 3D video coding using new tools based on view synthesis. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9):3517–3527CrossRefGoogle Scholar

B4. 3D-HEVC Efficiency in Joint Coding of Dependents View and Depth Data

  1. Müller K (2014) 3D extensions for high-efficiency video coding. IEEE Comsoc MMTC E-Lett 9(1)Google Scholar
  2. Zhang N, Zhao D, Chen Y-W, Lin J-L, Gao W (2014) Fast encoder decision for texture coding in 3D-HEVC. Signal Process Image Commun 29(9):951–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang Y, Kwong S, Xu L, Hu S, Jiang G, Kuo C-CJ (2013) Regional bit allocation and rate distortion optimization for multiview depth video coding with view synthesis distortion model. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(9):3497–3512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dragorad A. Milovanovic
    • 1
  • Dragan Kukolj
    • 2
    Email author
  • Zoran S. Bojkovic
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.University of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations