Chapter B2 Fibrocartilage

  • V. M. Gharpuray
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The human menisci and intervertebral discs perform several important mechanical functions in the human body. The ability to perform these functions and consequently their intrinsic biomechanical properties are dependent on the interaction of the constituents of these structures. Both the menisci and intervertebral discs have a fibrocartilaginous structure that consists of two distinct phases: a fluid phase consisting of mainly water and dissolved electrolytes, and a solid phase composed of highly oriented collagen fibers, cells, proteoglycans and other proteins. As with all other biological materials, both menisci and discs exhibit non-linear viscoelastic and anisotropic properties. The non-linear stiffness or elasticity of the structure is imparted by the collagen fibers and to a lesser extent by osmotic pressures within the tissue which are generated by the degree of hydration [1, 2]. The viscoelastic or energy dissipation properties are a result of fluid flow within and through the structures and also of molecular relaxation effects from the motion of long chains of collagen and proteoglycans [3]. Anisotropy is a consequence of the orientation and concentration of collagen fibers within the proteoglycan gel.

Keywords

Intervertebral Disc Lateral Meniscus Medial Meniscus Dynamic Modulus Discal Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong, C.G. and Mow, V.C. (1982) Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration and water content. J. Bone Joint Surg., 64A, 88–94.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mow, V.C., Holmes, M.H. and Lai, W.M. (1984) Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: A review. J. Biomech., 102, 73–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayes, W.C. and Bodine, A.J. (1978) Flow independent viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage matrix. J. Biomech., 11, 407–419.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathur, P.D., McDonald, J.R. and Ghormley, R.K. (1949) A study of the tensile strength of the menisci of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg., 32A, 650–654.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aspden, R.M., Yarker, Y.E. and Hukins, D.W.L. (1985) Collagen Orientations in the meniscus of the knee joint. J. Anat., 140, 371–380.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bullough, P.G., Munuera, L., Murphy, J. and Weinstein, A.M. (1970) The strength of the menisci of the knee as it relates to their fine structure. J. Bone Joint Surg., 52B, 564–570.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fithian, D.C., Kelly, M.A. and Mow, V.C. (1990) Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin. Orthop. Rei. Res., 252, 19–31.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mow, V.C., Zhu, W. and Ratcliffe, A. (1991) Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus, in Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, (eds V.C. Mow and W.C. Hayes), Raven Press, New York, pp. 143–198.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eyre, D.R. and Wu, J.J. (1983) Collagen of fibrocartilage: A distinctive molecular phenotype in bovine meniscus. F. E. B. S. Letters, 158, 265–270.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fithian, D.C., Zhu, W.B., Ratcliffe, A., Kelly, M.A. and Mow, V.C. (1989b) Exponential law representation of tensile properties of human meniscus. Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers. The Changing Role of Orthopaedics, Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, London. pp. 85–90Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghosh, P. and Taylor, T.K.F. (1987) The knee joint meniscus: A fibrocartilage of some distinction. Clin. Orthop. Rei. Res., 224, 52–63.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ingman, A.M., Ghosh, P. and Taylor, T.K.F. (1974) Variation of collagenous and non-collagenous proteins of human knee joint menisci with age and degeneration. Gerontology, 20, 212–223.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pooni, J.S., Hukins, D.W.L., Harris, P.F., Hilton, R.C. and Davies, K.E. (1986) Comparison of the structure of human intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine. Surg. Radiol. Anat., 8, 175–182.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirsch, C., Inglemark, B-H. and Miller, M. (1963) The anatomical basis of back pain. Acta Orthop. Scand., 33, 2–17.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, H.S., Liu, Y.K. and Adams, K.H. (1978) Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. J. Bone Joint Surg., 60A, 41–55.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin, H.S., Liu, Y.K., Ray, G. and Nikravesh, P. (1978) System identification for material properties of the intervertebral joint. J. Biomech., 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor, J.R. (1975) Growth of human intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies. J. Anat., 120, 49–68.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panjabi, M.M., Summers, D.J., Pelker, R.R., Videman, T., Friedlander, G.E. and Southwick, W.O. (1986) Three-dimensional load-displacement curves due to forces on the cervical spine. J. Ortho. Res., 4, 152–161.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Inoue, H. (1981) Three-dimensional architecture of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine, 6, 139–146.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Panagiotacopulos, N.D., Knauss, W.G. and Bloch, R. (1979) On the mechanical properties of human intervertebral disc materials. Biorheology, 16, 317–330.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marchand, F. and Ahmed, A.M. (1988) Investigation of the laminate structure of lumbar disc annulus fibrosus. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc., 13, 271.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Best B.A., Guilak, F., Setton, L.A., Zhu, W., Saed-Nejad, F., Ratcliffe, A., Weidenbaum, M. and Mow, V.C. (1994) Compressive mechanical properties of the human annulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. Spine, 19, 212–221.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gower, W.E. and Pedrini, V. (1969) Age-related variations in protein-polysaccharide from human nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus and costal cartilage. J. Bone Joint Surg., 51A, 1154–1162.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lyons, G., Eisenstein, S.M. and Sweet, M.B.E. (1981) Biochemical changes in intervertebral disc degeneration, Biophysics Acta, 673, 443.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lai, W.M. and Mow, V.C. (1980) Drag-induced compression of articular cartilage during a permeation experiment. Biorheology, 17, 111–123.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Proctor, C.S., Schmidt, M.B., Whipple, R.R., Kelly, M.A. and Mow, V.C. (1989) Material Properties of the normal medial bovine meniscus. J. Ortho. Res., 7, 771–782.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eberhardt, A.W., Keer, L.M., Lewis, J.L. and Vithoontien, V. (1990) An analytical model of joint contact. J. Biomech. Eng., 112, 407–413.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fithian D.C., Schmidt, M.B., Ratcliffe, A. and Mow, V.C. (1989a) Human meniscus tensile properties: Regional variation and biochemical correlation. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc., 14, 205.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brown, T., Hansen, R.J. and Torra, A.J. (1957) Some mechanical tests on the lumbosacral spine with particular reference to the intervertebral discs. J. Bone Joint Surg., 39A, 1135–1164.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hirsch, C. and Nachemson, A. (1954) New observations on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar discs. Acta Orthop. Scand., 23, 254–283.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schultz, A.B., Warwick, D.N., Berkson, M.H. and Nachemson, A.L. (1979) Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments Part I. J. Biomech. Eng., 101, 46–52.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berkson, M.H., Nachemson, A. and Schultz, A.B. (1979) Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments Part I. J. Biomech. Eng., 101,53–57.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marchand, F. and Ahmed, A.M. (1989) Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of the lumbar disc annulus. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc., 14, 355.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Galante, J.O. (1967) Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop. Scand., (Suppl. 100), 1–91.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chern, K.Y., Zhu, W.B. and Mow, V.C. (1989) Anisotropic viscoelastic shear properties of meniscus. Adv. Bioeng., BED-15, 105–106.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Burns, M.L. et al. (1984) Analysis of compressive creep behavior of the vertebral unit subjected to uniform axial loading using exact parametric solution equations of Kelvin solid models Part I. J. Biomech., 17, 113–130.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kazarian, L.E. and Kaleps, I. (1979) Mechanical and physical properties of the human intervertebral joint. Technical Report AMRL-TR-79-3, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Black, J. (1976) Dead or alive: The problem of in vitro tissue mechanics. J. Biomed. Mats. Res., 10, 377–389.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Black, J. (1984) Tissue properties: Relation of in vitro studies to in vivo behavior, in Natural and Living Biomaterials, Ed. G.W. Hastings and P. Ducheyne, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. M. Gharpuray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bioengineering 401 Rhodes Eng. Res. Ctr.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations