Effect of the Antioxidant Supplement Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Disodium Salt (BioPQQ™) on Cognitive Functions

  • Yuji Itoh
  • Kyoko Hine
  • Hiroshi Miura
  • Tatsuo Uetake
  • Masahiko Nakano
  • Naohiro Takemura
  • Kaoru Sakatani
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 876)

Abstract

Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) is a quinone compound first identified in 1979. It has been reported that rats fed a PQQ-supplemented diet showed better learning ability than controls, suggesting that PQQ may be useful for improving memory in humans. In the present study, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study to examine the effect of PQQ disodium salt (BioPQQ™) on cognitive functions was conducted with 41 elderly healthy subjects. Subjects were orally given 20 mg of BioPQQ™ per day or placebo, for 12 weeks. For cognitive functions, selective attention by the Stroop and reverse Stroop test, and visual-spatial cognitive function by the laptop tablet Touch M, were evaluated. In the Stroop test, the change of Stroop interference ratios (SIs) for the PQQ group was significantly smaller than for the placebo group. In the Touch M test, the stratification analyses dividing each group into two groups showed that only in the lower group of the PQQ group (initial score < 70), did the score significantly increase. Measurements of physiological parameters indicated no abnormal blood or urinary adverse events, nor adverse internal or physical examination findings at any point in the study. The preliminary experiment using near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS) suggests that cerebral blood flow in the prefrontal cortex was increased by the administration of PQQ. The results suggest that PQQ can prevent reduction of brain function in aged persons, especially in attention and working memory.

Keywords

PQQ Brain Memory Attention Supplement 

References

  1. 1.
    Salisbury SA, Forrest HS, Cruse WBT et al (1979) A novel coenzyme from bacterial primary alcohol dehydrogenase. Nature 280:843–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duine JA, Frank J, Van Zeeland JK (1979) Glucose dehydrogenase from acinetobacter calcoaceticus: a quinoprotein. FEBS Lett 108:443–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumazawa T, Sato K, Seno H et al (1995) Levels of pyrroloquinoline quinone in various foods. Biochem J 307:331–333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumazawa T, Seno H, Urakami T et al (1992) Trace levels of pyrroloquinoline quinone in human and rat samples detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1156:62–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitchell AE, Johnes AD, Mercer RS et al (1999) Characterization of pyrroloquinoline quinone amino acid derivatives by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and detection in human milk. Anal Biochem 269:317–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rucker R, Chowanadisai W, Nakano M (2009) Potential physiological importance of pyrroloquinoline quinone. Altern Med Rev 14:268–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mukai K, Ouchi A, Nakano M (2011) Kinetic study of the quenching reaction of singlet oxygen by pyrroloquinolinequinole (PQQH2, a reduced form of pyrroloquinolinequinone) in micellar solution. J Agric Food Chem 59:1705–1712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nunome K, Miyazaki S, Nakano M et al (2008) Pyrroloquinoline quinone prevents oxidative stress-induced neuronal death probably through changes in oxidative status of DJ-1. Biol Pharm Bull 31(7):1321–1326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamaguchi K, Sasano A, Urakami T et al (1993) Stimulation of nerve growth factor production by pyrroloquinoline quinone and its derivatives in vitro and in vivo. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 57:1231–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohwada K, Takeda H, Yamazaki M et al (2008) Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) prevents cognitive deficit caused by oxidative stress in rats. J Clin Biochem Nutr 42:29–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hakoda Y, Sasaki M (1990) Group version of the Stroop and reverse-Stroop test –the effects of reaction mode, order and practice. Jpn J Educ Psychol 38:389–394 (Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watanabe M, Hakoda Y, Matsumoto A (2011) Group version of the Stroop and reverse-Stroop test: an asymmetric development trait in two kinds of interference. Psychol Res Kusyu Univ 12:41–50Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayashi Y, Kijima T, Satou K et al (2011) Examination of the evaluation method of visual-spatial cognitive function using the touch screen device. Jpn J Geriatr Psychiatry 22(4):439–447 (Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clausen J, Nielsen SA, Kristensen M (1989) Biochemical and clinical effects on an antioxidative supplementation of geriatric patients. A double blind study. Biol Trace Elem Res 20:135–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Itoh
    • 1
  • Kyoko Hine
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Miura
    • 1
  • Tatsuo Uetake
    • 2
  • Masahiko Nakano
    • 3
  • Naohiro Takemura
    • 4
  • Kaoru Sakatani
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.CX Medical Japan Co., Inc.TokyoJapan
  3. 3.Niigata Research Laboratory, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Inc.NiigataJapan
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringLaboratory of Integrative Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Nihon UniversityTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineNihon UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations