Understanding the Population Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance for Marine Mammals
Loud anthropogenic underwater noise, such as that associated with sonar operations, pile driving, or seismic surveys, can cause behavioral and physiological disturbance to many animals that may affect their survival or ability to breed. However, no formal framework for assessing the population-level consequences of this disturbance is currently available. We describe an interim version of a framework developed by a working group on the population consequences of disturbance, funded by the US Office of Naval Research through the University of California, that can be used to assess the effects of offshore renewable energy developments on marine mammal populations.
KeywordsRenewable energy Noise
Work on the development of the interim population consequences of disturbance protocol was supported by contracts to Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) Marine from The Crown Estate, Marine Scotland, the Department for Energy and Climate Change, and the Natural Environment Research Council. The work benefited greatly from discussions with participants in a working group supported by Office of Naval Research Grants N00014-09-1-0896 to the University of California, Santa Barbara and N00014-12-1-0274 to the University of California, Davis.
- DeRuiter SL, Southall BL, Calambokidis J, Zimmer WM, Sadykova D, Falcone EA, Friedlaender AS, Joseph JE, Moretti D, Schorr GS, Thomas L, Tyack PL (2013) First direct measurements of behavioural responses by Cuvier’s beaked whales to mid-frequency active sonar. Biol Lett 9:20130223. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0223 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldbogen JA, Southall BL, DeRuiter SL, Calambokidis J, Friedlaender AS, Hazen EL, Falcone EA, Schorr GS, Douglas A, Moretti DJ, Kyburg C, McKenna MF, Tyack PL (2013) Blue whales respond to simulated mid-frequency military sonar. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20130657. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lusseau D (2004) The hidden cost of tourism: detecting long-term effects of tourism using behavioral information. Ecol Soc 9:2Google Scholar
- Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative conservation biology: Theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
- Nabe-Nielsen J, Tougaard J, Teilmann J, Sveegaard S (2011) Effects of wind farms on harbour porpoise behaviour and population dynamics. Report commissioned by the Environmental Group under the Danish Environmental Monitoring Programme. Scientific report from Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 1, Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- NRC (National Research Council) (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: Determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Tougaard J, Kyhn LA, Amundin M, Wennerberg D, Bordin C (2012) Behavioral reactions of harbor porpoise to pile-driving noise. In: Popper AN, Hawkins AD (eds) Effects of noise on aquatic life. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 730th edn. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar