From Where? Synaptic Tagging Allows the Nucleus Not to Care

  • Shannon Farris
  • Serena M. DudekEmail author


Most of us now accept that the formation of long-lasting memories requires de novo transcription of plasticity-related proteins. It is also thought that localized translation of these transcripts, at or near recently activated synaptic sites, structurally stabilizes synaptic connections, thereby consolidating the memory. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying where, when, and how these newly synthesized transcripts participate in memory storage has remained a formidable question in neuroscience. Here we discuss the hypothesis that the nucleus acts as a calculator of incoming signals from activated synapses, either in the form of an electrical signal, through calcium, or as part of a transported signal. As long as a synaptic tag is created, the form of how a signal reaches the nucleus is freed from the requirement of leaving a “trail of breadcrumbs.” The nucleus can instead detect information on how the neuron fits into the network (counting number of modified or active synapses, or whether inhibitory neurons have a say, for example). We propose that it is the output of the nucleus, or nucleus-to-synapse signaling, along with the type of synaptic tag formed, that determines whether the right transcript will be translated at the right synapse at the right time. We further discuss the idea of inverse tagging and how local protein synthesis might play a role in distinguishing inactive versus active synapses.


Synaptic tagging Action potentials Dendritic mRNA Arc/Arg3.1 Local protein synthesis 



This research was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health.


  1. Adams JP, Dudek SM (2005) Late-phase long-term potentiation: getting to the nucleus. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:737–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelman K, Lis JT (2012) Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet 13:720–731PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barco A, Alarcon JM, Kandel ER (2002) Expression of constitutively active CREB protein facilitates the late phase of long-term potentiation by enhancing synaptic capture. Cell 108:689–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnisch T, YuanXiang P, Bethge P, Parvez S, Chen Y, Yu J, Karpova A, Frey JU, Mikhaylova M, Kreutz MR (2011) Nuclear translocation of jacob in hippocampal neurons after stimuli inducing long-term potentiation but not long-term depression. PLoS One 6:e17276PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bukalo O, Campanac E, Hoffman DA, Fields RD (2013) Synaptic plasticity by antidromic firing during hippocampal network oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:5175–5180PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cajigas IJ, Tushev G, Will TJ, tom Dieck S, Fuerst N, Schuman EM (2012) The local transcriptome in the synaptic neuropil revealed by deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging. Neuron 74:453–466PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ch’ng TH, Uzgil B, Lin P, Avliyakulov NK, O’Dell TJ, Martin KC (2012) Activity-dependent transport of the transcriptional coactivator CRTC1 from synapse to nucleus. Cell 150:201–221Google Scholar
  8. Chowdhury S, Shepherd JD, Okuno H, Lyford G, Petralia RS, Plath N, Kuhl D, Huganir RL, Worley PF (2006) Arc/Arg3.1 interacts with the endocytic machinery to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron 52:445–459PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis HP, Squire LR (1984) Protein synthesis and memory: a review. Psychol Bull 96:518–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis S, Vanhoutte P, Pagès C, Caboche J, Laroche S (2000) The MAPK/ERK cascade targets both Elk-1 and cAMP response element-binding protein to control long-term potentiation-dependent gene expression in the dentate gyrus in vivo. J Neurosci 20:4563–4572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Rubeis S, Pasciuto E, Li KW, Fernández E, Di Marino D, Buzzi A, Ostroff LE, Klann E, Zwartkruis FJT, Komiyama NH et al (2013) CYFIP1 coordinates mRNA translation and cytoskeleton remodeling to ensure proper dendritic spine formation. Neuron 79:1169–1182PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dictenberg JB, Swanger SA, Antar LN, Singer RH, Bassell GJ (2008) A direct role for FMRP in activity-dependent dendritic mRNA transport links filopodial-spine morphogenesis to fragile X syndrome. Dev Cell 14:926–939PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Doyle M, Kiebler MA (2011) Mechanisms of dendritic mRNA transport and its role in synaptic tagging. EMBO J 30:3540–3552PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudek SM, Fields RD (2001) Mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in somatodendritic compartments: roles of action potentials, frequency, and mode of calcium entry. J Neurosci 21(2):RC122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudek SM, Fields RD (2002) Somatic action potentials are sufficient for late-phase LTP-related cell signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:3962–3967PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dynes JL, Steward O (2007) Dynamics of bidirectional transport of Arc mRNA in neuronal dendrites. J Comp Neurol 500:433–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farris S, Lewandowski G, Cox CD, Steward O (2014) Selective localization of arc mRNA in dendrites involves activity- and translation-dependent mRNA degradation. J Neurosci 34:4481–4493PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonseca R, Nägerl UV, Morris RGM, Bonhoeffer T (2004) Competing for memory: hippocampal LTP under regimes of reduced protein synthesis. Neuron 44:1011–1020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey S, Frey JU (2008) Chapter 7 “synaptic tagging” and “cross-tagging” and related associative reinforcement processes of functional plasticity as the cellular basis for memory formation. In: Lacaille JC, Castellucci VF, Belleville S, Sossin WS (eds) Progress in brain research. Elsevier, New York, pp 117–143Google Scholar
  20. Frey U, Morris RGM (1997) Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature 385:533–536Google Scholar
  21. Fritzsche R, Karra D, Bennett KL, Ang F, Heraud-Farlow JE, Tolino M, Doyle M, Bauer KE, Thomas S, Planyavsky M et al (2013) Interactome of two diverse RNA granules links mRNA localization to translational repression in neurons. Cell Rep 5:1749–1762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujii H, Inoue M, Okuno H, Sano Y, Takemoto-Kimura S, Kitamura K, Kano M, Bito H (2013) Nonlinear decoding and asymmetric representation of neuronal input information by CaMKIIα and calcineurin. Cell Rep 3:978–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goelet P, Castellucci VF, Schacher S, Kandel ER (1986) The long and the short of long-term memory—a molecular framework. Nature 322:419–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guzowski JF, McNaughton BL, Barnes CA, Worley PF (1999) Environment-specific expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in hippocampal neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 2:1120–1124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guzowski JF, Lyford GL, Stevenson GD, Houston FP, McGaugh JL, Worley PF, Barnes CA (2000) Inhibition of activity-dependent Arc protein expression in the rat hippocampus impairs the maintenance of long-term potentiation and the consolidation of long-term memory. J Neurosci 20:3993–4001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Karpova A, Mikhaylova M, Bera S, Bär J, Reddy PP, Behnisch T, Rankovic V, Spilker C, Bethge P, Sahin J et al (2013) Encoding and transducing the synaptic or extrasynaptic origin of NMDA receptor signals to the nucleus. Cell 152:1119–1133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauderer BS, Kandel ER (2000) Capture of a protein synthesis-dependent component of long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13342–13347PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Köhrmann M, Luo M, Kaether C, DesGroseillers L, Dotti CG, Kiebler MA (1999) Microtubule-dependent recruitment of Staufen-green fluorescent protein into large RNA-containing granules and subsequent dendritic transport in living hippocampal neurons. Mol Biol Cell 10:2945–2953PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS (2001) Neuronal RNA granules: a link between RNA localization and stimulation-dependent translation. Neuron 32:683–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lai K-O, Zhao Y, Ch’ng TH, Martin KC (2008) Importin-mediated retrograde transport of CREB2 from distal processes to the nucleus in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:17175–17180PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Link W, Konietzko U, Kauselmann G, Krug M, Schwanke B, Frey U, Kuhl D (1995) Somatodendritic expression of an immediate early gene is regulated by synaptic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:5734–5738PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lyford GL, Yamagata K, Kaufmann WE, Barnes CA, Sanders LK, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Lanahan AA, Worley PF (1995) Arc, a growth factor and activity-regulated gene, encodes a novel cytoskeleton-associated protein that is enriched in neuronal dendrites. Neuron 14:433–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin KC, Kosik KS (2002) Synaptic tagging—who’s it? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Messaoudi E, Kanhema T, Soule J, Tiron A, Dagyte G, da Silva B, Bramham CR (2007) Sustained Arc/Arg3.1 synthesis controls long-term potentiation consolidation through regulation of local actin polymerization in the dentate gyrus in vivo. J Neurosci 27:10445–10455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Napoli I, Mercaldo V, Boyl PP, Eleuteri B, Zalfa F, De Rubeis S, Di Marino D, Mohr E, Massimi M, Falconi M et al (2008) The fragile X syndrome protein represses activity-dependent translation through CYFIP1, a new 4E-BP. Cell 134:1042–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nonaka M, Fujii H, Kim R, Kawashima T, Okuno H, Bito H (2014) Untangling the two-way signalling route from synapses to the nucleus, and from the nucleus back to the synapses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369(1633):20130150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Okuno H, Akashi K, Ishii Y, Yagishita-Kyo N, Suzuki K, Nonaka M, Kawashima T, Fujii H, Takemoto-Kimura S, Abe M et al (2012) Inverse synaptic tagging of inactive synapses via dynamic interaction of Arc/Arg3.1 with CaMKIIβ. Cell 149:886–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patterson SL, Pittenger C, Morozov A, Martin KC, Scanlin H, Drake C, Kandel ER (2001) Some forms of cAMP-mediated long-lasting potentiation are associated with release of BDNF and nuclear translocation of phospho-MAP kinase. Neuron 32:123–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poon MM, Choi S-H, Jamieson CAM, Geschwind DH, Martin KC (2006) Identification of process-localized mRNAs from cultured rodent hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 26:13390–13399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rial Verde EM, Lee-Osbourne J, Worley P, Malinow R, Cline H (2006) Increased expression of the immediate-early gene Arc/Arg3.1 reduces AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission. Neuron 52:461–474PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Saha RN, Dudek SM (2008) Action potentials: to the nucleus and beyond. Exp Biol Med 233:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saha RN, Dudek SM (2013) Splitting hares and tortoises: a classification of neuronal immediate early gene transcription based on poised RNA polymerase II. Neuroscience 247:175–181PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Saha RN, Wissink EM, Bailey ER, Zhao M, Fargo DC, Hwang J-Y, Daigle KR, Fenn JD, Adelman K, Dudek SM (2011) Rapid activity-induced transcription of Arc and other IEGs relies on poised RNA polymerase II. Nat Neurosci 14:848–856PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Sajikumar S, Frey JU (2004) Late-associativity, synaptic tagging, and the role of dopamine during LTP and LTD. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82:12–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepherd JD, Rumbaugh G, Wu J, Chowdhury S, Plath N, Kuhl D, Huganir RL, Worley PF (2006) Arc/Arg3.1 mediates homeostatic synaptic scaling of AMPA receptors. Neuron 52:475–484PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Steward O, Wallace CS, Lyford GL, Worley PF (1998) Synaptic activation causes the mRNA for the IEG arc to localize selectively near activated postsynaptic sites on dendrites. Neuron 21:741–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tübing F, Vendra G, Mikl M, Macchi P, Thomas S, Kiebler MA (2010) Dendritically localized transcripts are sorted into distinct ribonucleoprotein particles that display fast directional motility along dendrites of hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 30:4160–4170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiegert JS, Bengtson CP, Bading H (2007) Diffusion and not active transport underlies and limits ERK1/2 synapse-to-nucleus signaling in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem 282:29621–29633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young JZ, Nguyen PV (2005) Homosynaptic and heterosynaptic inhibition of synaptic tagging and capture of long-term potentiation by previous synaptic activity. J Neurosci 25:7221–7231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhai S, Ark ED, Parra-Bueno P, Yasuda R (2013) Long-distance integration of nuclear ERK signaling triggered by activation of a few dendritic spines. Science 342:1107–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao M, Adams JP, Dudek SM (2005) Pattern-dependent role of NMDA receptors in action potential generation: consequences on extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. J Neurosci 25:7032–7039PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhong J, Zhang T, Bloch L (2006) Dendritic mRNAs encode diversified functionalities in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. BMC Neurosci 7:17PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhou Y, Wu H, Li S, Chen Q, Cheng XW, Zheng J, Takemori H, Xiong ZQ (2006) Requirement of TORC1 for late-phase long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. PLoS One 1:e16PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of NeurobiologyNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of HealthResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations