Advertisement

Complexity and the Limits of Revolution: What Will Happen to the Arab Spring?

  • Alexander S. Gard-Murray
  • Yaneer Bar-YamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

The recent social unrest across the Middle East and North Africa has deposed dictators who had ruled for decades. While the events have been hailed as an “Arab Spring” by those who hope that repressive autocracies will be replaced by democracies, what sort of regimes will eventually emerge from the crisis remains far from certain. Here we provide a complex systems framework, validated by historical precedent, to help answer this question. We describe the dynamics of governmental change as an evolutionary process similar to biological evolution, in which complex organizations gradually arise by replication, variation, and competitive selection. Different kinds of governments, however, have differing levels of complexity. Democracies must be more systemically complex than autocracies because of their need to incorporate large numbers of people in decision-making. This difference has important implications for the relative robustness of democratic and autocratic governments after revolutions. Revolutions may disrupt existing evolved complexity, limiting the potential for building more complex structures quickly. Insofar as systemic complexity is reduced by revolution, democracy is harder to create in the wake of unrest than autocracy. Applying this analysis to the Middle East and North Africa, we infer that in the absence of stable institutions or external assistance, new governments are in danger of facing increasingly insurmountable challenges and reverting to autocracy.

Keywords

Middle East Democratic Government External Intervention Autocratic Government Governmental Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Greg Lindsay, Karla Z. Bertrand, Dominic Albino, Urbano França, and Yavni Bar-Yam for editorial assistance, Lawrence E Susskind, Robert H. Bates, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by AFOSR under grant FA9550-09-1-0324, ONR under grant N000140910516.

References

  1. 1.
    Gurr, T. R. (1988). War, revolution, and the growth of the coercive state. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, J., & Goldstone, J. A. (2005). State development after revolutions - Rapid state building or transforming existing structures under pressure? In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and development: Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance (pp. 183–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michels, R. (2001). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Ontario: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rueschemeyer, D. (2005) Building states: Inherently a long-term process? An argument from theory. In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and development: Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance (pp. 143–164). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weede, E., & Muller, E. N. (1997) Consequences of revolutions. Rationality and Society, 9, 327 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foran, J., & Goodwin, J. (1993). Revolutionary outcomes in Iran and Nicaragua: Coalition fragmentation, war, and the limits of social transformation. Theory and Society, 22, 209 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldstone, J. A. (1998). The encyclopedia of political revolutions. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rueschemeyer, D. (2010, October). On the state and prospects of comparative democratization research. Comparative Democratization Section of the American Political Science Association (APSA-CD) Newsletter, 8, 1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stinchcombe, A. L. (1999). Ending revolutions and building new governments. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldstone, J. A., Bates, R. H., Epstein, D. L., Gurr, T. R., Lustik, M. B., Marshall, M. G., et al. (2010). A global model for forecasting political stability. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lagi, M., Bertrand, K. Z., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2011, August 10). The food crises and political instability in North Africa and the Middle East. arXiv:1108.2455.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bar-Yam, Y. (2005). Making things work: Solving complex problems in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: NECSI Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewontin, R. C. (1970) The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bonner, J. T. (1988). The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). Complexity rising: From human beings to human civilization, a complexity profile. In Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford: UNESCO/EOLSS.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics (Chap. 11). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldstone, J. A. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flannery, K. V. (1972). The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1972). Complex societies: The evolutionary origins of a crude superorganism. Human Nature, 10, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boix, C., & Svolik, M. (2011). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions and power-sharing in dictatorships, Working paper.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Svolik, M. (2009). Power-sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A data set of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marshall, M. G., & Marshall, D. R. (2011). Coup d’Etat events, 1946–2010: Codebook. Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2012). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Modified polity P4 and P4D data, version 3.0. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/polity.html.
  30. 30.
    Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New England Complex Systems InstituteCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations